Jump to content

Jeter to Retire After 2014 Season


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

Whether you can convince them that Cal was better depends on how much your buddies believe in defense.

Isn't it hard to argue that defense isn't real important when you're talking about shortstops?

In every conversation I've had on this or similar subjects -- and I try to avoid them -- I end up hearing about Jeter's "intangible" contributions and his leadership. At that point, I usually put my head down. In my home, Jeter is sometimes referred to as "Captain Intangibles."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Whether you can convince them that Cal was better depends on how much your buddies believe in defense.

On offense alone there's a strong argument that Jeter was the better player. Cal had more power and a lot more HRs but Jeter has a big advantage in AVG/OBP and a higher career OPS and OPS+. Jeter will end his career with about 300 more hits than Cal despite playing in about 300 less games.

But defensively Cal was so much better than Jeter that there is no debate. Cal was transcendent as a fielder at SS. Jeter's famous jump/throw plays helped him get a good reputation as a fielder for most of his career, which helped him win a couple gold gloves, but the stats show he was never actually very effective as a defender because of his below average range. The last few years especially Jeter has been a liability in the field, while Cal switched to 3b during his declining seasons so his defense did not deteriorate as much.

If you want the simplest argument, Cal had 95 career WAR and Jeter has 72, which is in my mind a big enough gap to be convincing even if you are only halfway a believer in WAR.

First off, I would take Ripken over Jeter. But does the difference in WAR have anything to do with the fact (well, my perception, and I'll watch it get disproved) that Jeter played in an environment with better shortstops? In other words, would the gap be closer if their careers covered the same years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it hard to argue that defense isn't real important when you're talking about shortstops?

In every conversation I've had on this or similar subjects -- and I try to avoid them -- I end up hearing about Jeter's "intangible" contributions and his leadership. At that point, I usually put my head down. In my home, Jeter is sometimes referred to as "Captain Intangibles."

How often did Jeter call pitches? :)

Again, Jeter is a great player...first time HOFer, but I still go with Ripken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cal gets a fat pitch in his last All Star game and hits it out. Jeter gets the same pitch in his last game and hits a double. :D

And now Adam Wainwright has to open his mouth and ruin the experience. Too bad Adam can't keep his mouth shut and let Jeter enjoy the moment- that's the classy thing to do. It's a shame Adam can't be more like Cal and Derek tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you recorded the game, go back and watch Jeter's first at bat. You can hear him tell the catcher not to tell him what is coming for the first pitch. Let him see the first pitch. Then the next pitch Wainwright grooves a fastball down the middle and Jeter is all over it. I know this happens all the time, but I laughing when the announcers were gushing about how much of a gamer Jeter is in situations like this after he got the double. He knew what was coming! I still agree that Wainwright should have kept his mouth closed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam mentioned to one reporter he wanted to give Derek something to hit, but if he knew if it was going to be for a double he would have thought otherwise. Then near the end of the game to another reporter he said his humor got misunderstood. Adam isn't so sharp in front of the media it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more practical reasoning has been given. If you want to use some things that sound impressive:

  • Cal has more HR's from the SS position than any other player in history,
  • and he is 4th in the history of baseball at any position in defensive WAR (baseball reference).

That's a pretty good combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • There probably was no "right" choice and absolutely no "absolutely right choice" I was on record wanting to choose Abrahms and my logic was simple, a 1:1 is a chance to pick a HOF type talent A college catcher was a safe pick and Adley is having a nice career but he is clearly not a MVP/HOF type player.
    • Agreed, Akin is pitching too well to be optioned until there’s no other choices. Tate should certainly be optioned before him. The only reason I could see Akin needing to be optioned is if BOTH Means and Irvin end up in the pen (with Bradish, Kremer and Suárez starting). That’s possibly the best 5 SP right now if they believe Suárez > Means/Irvin. In which case you really can’t have 5 lefty RP and only one RHP to go with Kimbrel and Cano. Otherwise, they should carry 4 lefty RP (with one of Means/Irvin as the long man) before optioning Akin. 
    • The answer to the question is obviously no. Now if the question was would Gunnar have been worthy #1 pick the answer seems obvious that he would have been.    But taking him where he went allowed the Orioles to maximize their draft which is what every team hopes to do.    You can argue whether Adley was the right pick but if Gunnar went first there is no way the two picks work as well for Baltimore. 
    • 1080i video is redrawn a half frame (field) at 60 times per second.  Progressive footage like 1080p is 30 whole frames per second but often converted to interlaced format for transmission. If you are doing this on an ongoing basis, here's a suggestion: download the free version of one of the numerous non-linear editors out there like Avid or DaVinci Resolve and throw the clip on a timeline for your measurement.  Manually clicking through hundreds of frames seems like it would be needlessly cumbersome not to mention slow.  
    • This. I don’t get the Akin going down talk (even though it seems more based off his option remaining than performance). Right now Akin is arguably our 4th most trusted reliever (can argue with Webb) based off his usage and his peripherals are clearly in the top 4 with Cano, Kimbrel, and Coulombe. He might not be a setup guy but he’s a solid piece to have in the middle innings.   Akin’s K-BB% is nearly double that of Baumann’s in both of their careers as relievers. He K’s more, walks less, and gets more chases and whiffs.   Keeping Baumann over Akin even for a week isn’t a move that winning teams make. Not to trash him, but Baumann is just not good, so who cares if he gets claimed? He’s not trusted at this point late in close games unless the bullpen is overused, so if you lose him and need a replacement later in the year you have Heasley, Charles, and Tate (if he gets optioned). Then you also have Wells who should be a bullpen guy when he comes back. Having the flexibility is good but keeping one of your worst relievers just because he doesn’t have an option doesn’t seem like a good way to solve a log jam. 
    • Witt had hit tool questions on draft day, and Abrams was much less of a sure thing than Adley. Based on information known at the time, we absolutely made the right choice with Adley.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...