Jump to content

Hardy Extension Announced Today


WarehouseChatter

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Lol, I had to laugh at this, DEFENCE

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>O'Day said pitchers were high fiving when they heard about Hardy extension</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">October 9, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the O's had an opening at SS, would you go out this offseason and sign Hardy to a 3 years/$40? Hell yes, of course you would.

They probably could have gotten Stephen Drew for a song! Oh well, another misappropriation of funds for some to gnash their teeth about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My plan A would be Kang.

He profiles to get big money doesn't he? I've been following the KBO for a while and he looks like a solid player, but I honestly don't think he'll produce as much value as Hardy over the next three years. I mean, his line this year was incredible, but KBO pitching is bad and the league has experienced a roughly 40% increase in runs scored compared to 2012, and an 80% increase in HR's. I'm just not sure that's going to translate to more value for similar if not more money than Hardy. He's definitely an interesting player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Pedroia's deal look bad? 4.8 rWAR in 2014.

Well if you believe in defensive metrics that indicate he is a way superior 2B than Schoop, that's fine

His OPS of .711 and OPS+ of 101 were career lows in 2014, and he finished the season with yet another wrist surgery.

He is signed thru his age 37 (2021) season, and 2B typically age worse than any other position.

It will be a terrible signing for the Red Sox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He profiles to get big money doesn't he? I've been following the KBO for a while and he looks like a solid player, but I honestly don't think he'll produce as much value as Hardy over the next three years. I mean, his line this year was incredible, but KBO pitching is bad and the league has experienced a roughly 40% increase in runs scored compared to 2012, and an 80% increase in HR's. I'm just not sure that's going to translate to more value for similar if not more money than Hardy. He's definitely an interesting player.

I have no idea how the market will shape up. He is 27, plays solid defense at short and it looks like he will have plus power for his position. Also no back or shoulder issues and he won't be a 10/5 player.

Any idea if the Korean posting system got changed with the Japanese one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you believe in defensive metrics that indicate he is a way superior 2B than Schoop, that's fine

His OPS of .711 and OPS+ of 101 were career lows in 2014, and he finished the season with yet another wrist surgery.

He is signed thru his age 37 (2021) season, and 2B typically age worse than any other position.

It will be a terrible signing for the Red Sox

Do you think the Red Sox will be unable to keep buying players? If not, why's the contract so bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea how the market will shape up. He is 27, plays solid defense at short and it looks like he will have plus power for his position. Also no back or shoulder issues and he won't be a 10/5 player.

Any idea if the Korean posting system got changed with the Japanese one?

I asked Dan but I haven't gotten word back. I haven't read anything saying it has.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I'll like it much if the rumored deal is correct. I'd begrudgingly accept a 3/36 deal but not be psyched about it. Let's see how much worse it actually is.

It doesn't matter to me how much JJ will gets paid in this deal or the years. JJ is

a need. IMO. And does keep Manny at third. But main thing is the O's in the

playoffs so I am not worried about what players make or the years they are

signed for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol, I had to laugh at this, DEFENCE

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>O'Day said pitchers were high fiving when they heard about Hardy extension</p>? Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">October 9, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's pretty awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't either but if they leaned on the NPB it would make sense that they would also lean on the KBO.

Absolutely, if they haven't changed it yet, I'm sure it's coming down the road. The KBO is beginning to get scouted as hard as the NPB is now. They have some very interesting players.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...