Jump to content

Rule V, Gustave, Garcia and Verrett


Beef Supreme

Recommended Posts

Looks like the Orioles can trade for the rights for Rule V-ers Garcia and Verrett, if December's Jandel Gustave trade from the team that drafted him, Boston, to Kansas City is comparable. On Decemebr 11, Gustave was drafted and subsequently traded the same day -- it might be a little as an hour later. There would not have been time for Gustave to have cleared waivers.

Seems that acquiring teams have the opportunity to trade with the team from which he was acquired, bypassing waivers. I also suggest that this type of trade would nullify the Rule V mandate of having to keep the player on the MLB squad that year.

Does the Gustave trade from December parallel the situation that has been proposed that the Orioles could trade Boston and New York to keep Garcia and Verrett?

If this has been settled, mods please feel free to delete this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the Orioles can trade for the rights for Rule V-ers Garcia and Verrett, if December's Jandel Gustave trade from the team that drafted him, Boston, to Kansas City is comparable. On Decemebr 11, Gustave was drafted and subsequently traded the same day -- it might be a little as an hour later. There would not have been time for Gustave to have cleared waivers.

Seems that acquiring teams have the opportunity to trade with the team from which he was acquired, bypassing waivers. I also suggest that this type of trade would nullify the Rule V mandate of having to keep the player on the MLB squad that year.

Does the Gustave trade from December parallel the situation that has been proposed that the Orioles could trade Boston and New York to keep Garcia and Verrett?

If this has been settled, mods please feel free to delete this thread.

Unless you want to take away the Rule 5 designation, you may trade a player as many times as you like through the season. You just can never take him off the 25 man roster without waiver exposure, and offer back to original team.

This was never up in the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also suggest that this type of trade would nullify the Rule V mandate of having to keep the player on the MLB squad that year.

Does the Gustave trade from December parallel the situation that has been proposed that the Orioles could trade Boston and New York to keep Garcia and Verrett?

If this has been settled, mods please feel free to delete this thread.

No, it's different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To any team. But the rule 5 stipulation is still attached.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meaning the Orioles could trade Verrett to the Mets and they would not be able to option him? Now I am getting confused again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meaning the Orioles could trade Verrett to the Mets and they would not be able to option him? Now I am getting confused again.

Not that I believe.

In 1992, I think, the Braves selected their own player in the draft because they hadn't protected him.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they traded for the pick rather than trading for the player. Can teams trade for Rule V picks?

Can't trade for picks. Technically Houston picked Garcia and we traded for him. But obviously the phone call was made to tell Houston to pick him.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • It's a whole album thing tonight.  
    • I would have kept Irvin over Povich.
    • I would have kept air in over Povich.
    • I saw Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band at Camden Yards Friday night and they strung together multiple hits. Best thing I've seen at Camden all summer. In their nonstop 3 1/2 hour performance they practically burned the place down with Bruce pushing 74 years old. Here's hoping the Orioles can rally themselves and produce some magic of their own as the season winds down. Spot on post by the way.
    • I realized my mistake after posting the thread.  Good catch @Frobby
    • BAL tiebreakers  WON OVER BOS 
WON OVER KC WON OVER SEA vs CLE LOST  vs HOU LOST  NYY over CLE Currently     6-4 over NYY    3-0 over MINN     1-2  vs DET 2 weeks left  Playoff Magic number is 6 Magic number for home WC is 10 Added magic number for BAL for teams    AL Playoff Picture EAST                              GB               GL   MN NYY      87-63                                   12 BAL      84-66                3.0             12 CENTRAL CLE          86-64                              12 KC            82-68             4.0           12     (10)  MINN        79-70            6.5            13      (9) WEST HOU        81-68           - -            13 SEA          77-73          4.5           12        WC BAL          84-66 KC             82-68                 MINN        79-70 ————————————————— DET           77-73                2.5.           12  (6) SEA           77-73                2.5            12  (5) BOS          75-75               4.5             12  (3) SCHEDULES BAL  SF (3) DET (3) @NYY (3) @MIN (3) NYY  @SEA (3) @OAK (3) BAL (3) PIT (3) BOS @TB (3) MINN (3) @TOR (3) TB (3) —————————————————————— CLE MINN (4) @STL (3) CIN (2) HOU (3)  MINN @CLE (4) @BOS (3) MIA (3) BAL (3)  KC DET (3) SF (3) @WAS (3) @ATL (3)  DET @KC (3) @ BAL (3) TB (3) CWS (3) ———————————————————— SEA NYY (3) @TEX (3) @HOU (3) OAK (3)  HOU SD (3) LAA (4) SEA (3) @CLE (3)
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...