Jump to content

It Was Inevitable: 81-81


25 Nuggets

Recommended Posts

That-is-the-sound-of-inev-009.jpg

"That is the sound of inevitability."

It could not be more appropriate for this team to finish .500 on the dot. I've been calling this for three months now. Every time the team stretched to 4-5 games over .500, they shot themselves in the foot. Every time they fell 4-5 games under .500, they made gut check and clawed back. The team OPS+ hovered around 100 for most of the season and so did team ERA+. They have a positive run differential, but at the end of the season, not by that much.

The Wild Card mark to reach ended up being 86-87 wins (depending on the Houston game), like many of us thought. I'm not sure how to take it yet. What about all of you? Did this team overachieve based on lack of talent/health, underachieve based on previous seasons, or is this what the team was from the start? Is it worth giving everyone a mulligan for a year? Did this constitute meaningful baseball in September?

It was... OUR DESTINY.

:vader:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will be under .500 next year as we are back to the good ole cheap ass Angelos days.

Don't expect another possible playoff contender for another 5-10 years.

I knew last year when we lost Cruz,Miller,etc. it was gonna be this type of year. I said cellar very early

this year if you look at my June posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will be under .500 next year as we are back to the good ole cheap ass Angelos days.

Don't expect another possible playoff contender for another 5-10 years.

I knew last year when we lost Cruz,Miller,etc. it was gonna be this type of year. I said cellar very early

this year if you look at my June posts.

So you were wrong then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That-is-the-sound-of-inev-009.jpg

"That is the sound of inevitability."

It could not be more appropriate for this team to finish .500 on the dot. I've been calling this for three months now. Every time the team stretched to 4-5 games over .500, they shot themselves in the foot. Every time they fell 4-5 games under .500, they made gut check and clawed back. The team OPS+ hovered around 100 for most of the season and so did team ERA+. They have a positive run differential, but at the end of the season, not by that much.

The Wild Card mark to reach ended up being 86-87 wins (depending on the Houston game), like many of us thought. I'm not sure how to take it yet. What about all of you? Did this team overachieve based on lack of talent/health, underachieve based on previous seasons, or is this what the team was from the start? Is it worth giving everyone a mulligan for a year? Did this constitute meaningful baseball in September?

It was... OUR DESTINY.

:vader:

I don't see it as destiny at all. IMO you make your own destiny and losing all those tight games with the Twins wasn't any type of pre ordained destination whatsoever had we won all those games we would have been ok. The reason I believe we didn't was poor in game management action (or lack thereof ) by Buck. His not pulling his infield in closer when Britton is pitching against a team of speedy contact hitters was just flat out dumb and lost a number of games they should have won! It made no sense at all how he didn't manage that better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it as destiny at all. IMO you make your own destiny and losing all those tight games with the Twins wasn't any type of pre ordained destination whatsoever had we won all those games we would have been ok. The reason I believe we didn't was poor in game management action (or lack thereof ) by Buck. His not pulling his infield in closer when Britton is pitching against a team of speedy contact hitters was just flat out dumb and lost a number of games they should have won! It made no sense at all how he didn't manage that better!

For the record Old#5fan, I'm not being serious about the destiny thing. But the questions are in earnest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Thats how you frame.  You bring the ball up into the zone.  If your glove is set at target and then you go down for the low pitch momentum and gravity will carry the glove and ball lower and out of the zone.  Same with inside/outside pieces, if you show target and move out towards the edge of plate, momentum will carry glove & ball further away. Catchers are taught the show target first, then drop glove down and catch the ball with a motioning coming up.  Same for inside/outside pitch’s, the glove will start further away and then you catch it with a motion bringing it into zone.   It’s much more difficult to do hence the missed ball (a lot of that at lower levels).  The very good framers do it effortlessly and smoothly and can bring the ball into zone for strikes.  Gone are the days of “stick it” & turn your wrist.  
    • Official release for the John Martyn 1978 Rockpalast concert.  
    • I like the move.  I would have liked to have gotten a better arm, but I think it's a pretty fair trade.  Philly's probably grade out slightly higher, but which team fairs better this year because of the trade depends on a number of factors. The move does create some space for our young OF, but Pache is likely just a late inning replacement and that likely just shifts the pressure elsewhere. Also think Hays' comments are entirely overblown.  What the hell was he supposed to say getting traded from the #2 team so far to the #1? Lastly, in the same way moving Mancini to Houston was good for us and good for a respected Oriole, I like the opportunity Hays will have in Philly.
    • Agreed every player will say that going to a new team.  What they gonna say man that team is awful their organization is run terrible.   It’s always the same cliche responds.  I like our chances that are a team competing or if you go to a bottom team it is I like my chances to play they are an upcoming team with some young talent that I think I can help.  
    • Hays I 100% think he was bitter and resentful. About a month ago he had a decently big game and they interviewed him on field and he didn’t even seem happy. Then, Melanie asked him what it was like to be in left field with the (I don’t remember what it was called) Cowser cheering section. He did not seem amused at all. So yeah, prob another reason it was best he was traded. 
    • Just what @398 to Leftsaid in his post.  I was sitting in my car listening to the whole interview and Law said something like his reporting that Hayes wouldn’t be that missed in the locker room.  It surprised me and Bob never followed up on it.  It was just a quick remark like that.  
    • Iron also dulls iron. Depends on how they interact.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...