Jump to content

Fangraphs: Looking At 10 Years Of Growing MLB Payrolls


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

http://www.fangraphs.com/community/looking-at-10-years-of-growing-mlb-payrolls/

Not sold on this information on a team by team basis, since payrolls tend to fluctuate greatly for most teams.

The composite information is interesting, an overall increase of 57.2%. Baltimore actually came in over that number with a 63.7% increase.

Some nice graphs on winning percentages and attendance as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/community/looking-at-10-years-of-growing-mlb-payrolls/

Not sold on this information on a team by team basis, since payrolls tend to fluctuate greatly for most teams.

The composite information is interesting, an overall increase of 57.2%. Baltimore actually came in over that number with a 63.7% increase.

Some nice graphs on winning percentages and attendance as well.

I'm sold on it. Appears quite solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the average team had a salary of $77.6 mil in 2006, and $121.9 mil in 2015 for a pay raise of 57.2%. Am I the only one that thinks that looks steep compared to standard inflation and economic growth the past decade? Where is all this money coming from? (yes I know, TV deals, new stadiums/luxury seating, but where is all that money coming from?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the average team had a salary of $77.6 mil in 2006, and $121.9 mil in 2015 for a pay raise of 57.2%. Am I the only one that thinks that looks steep compared to standard inflation and economic growth the past decade? Where is all this money coming from? (yes I know, TV deals, new stadiums/luxury seating, but where is all that money coming from?)

TV deals. That has to be the overwhelming majority. Sports is one of the few things that isn't greatly impacted by time-shifting and the proliferation of types of entertainment. In some ways sports are all that's standing between cable companies and the abyss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the information is accurate. I am just not sold that you can look at any team and get a quality picture of the whole.

I also think the last chart is backwards. Payroll doesn't drive fan interest, winning does. It's just that payroll often drives wins so there appears to be correlation. If you spent $200M on new players and were 22-57 in June attendance would tank, if you spent $0.25 on new players and were 57-22 there would be a long waiting list for tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I think that's credible.   I'm disappointed but I also understand it.    Wells pitched well last year and his last two starts down here were good.   It would be tough telling him he didn't make the rotation.    The question is, what if Rodriguez dominates and all 5 starters are pitching decently during April and May.
    • I was thinking this at first too.  But.......isn't his trade value already predetermined to be two 1st round picks?    I don't think it is going to change thanks to the tag.   It might affect the size of the offer another team is willing to give him if they know he wants to leave.   That sucks for him and slightly increases the odds the Ravens would match it.  But the longer this drags on the less and less feasible that sounds.
    • It’s a real reporter from a real paper. So yes 
    • O’s ranked 18th at DH with 1.6 fWAR, with most PA coming from Stowers, Santander and Rutschman.  That brings projected position player WAR to 28.2, compared to 18.9 actual last year.  That would be a nice gain! “The Baltimore Orioles have some of the most promising young talent in the game, and it extends well beyond ballyhooed phenoms like Adley Rutschman, Gunnar Henderson, and Grayson Rodriguez. Notable among the less-hyped is Stanford product Kyle Stowers, who debuted last season at age 24 and homered three times while slashing .253/.306/.418 over 98 plate appearances. As modest as those get-your-feet-wet numbers are, it bears noting that he also put up a 130 wRC+ with 19 home runs in Triple-A, and he’d raked at Double-A in 2021. The 2019 second-rounder quietly continues to square up baseballs. “Anthony Santander has largely flown under the radar — at least on a national level — for much the same reason: he doesn’t get hyped as a big part of Baltimore’s future. But he arguably should. The 28-year-old switch-hitter produced a team-best 33 big flies last year, and ZiPS projects him to go deep 29 times with a 124 wRC+ in the coming season. A 2016 Rule-5 acquisition from Cleveland who was never viewed as a top prospect — even when the Orioles farm was far less formidable — Santander has developed into an offensive force.” https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2023-positional-power-rankings-designated-hitter/  
    • There is a recency bias too.  Is he more likely to repeat 2022 or 2021?
    • It's a combo of folks not liking that he was signed in the first place and his bat sucked in spring training.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...