Jump to content

Joe Orsulak: Putting Dylan Bundy In Orioles' Rotation Would Risk His Future (He's starting anyway)


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

Yea, I guess that is what makes this discussion so interesting, no one really knows what the right answer should be and we can really only find out if they make the wrong decision, not the right one.

No even if he gets injured it doesn't mean he wouldn't have gotten injured if we didn't start him. There is no control group no matter what we decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No even if he gets injured it doesn't mean he wouldn't have gotten injured if we didn't start him. There is no control group no matter what we decide.

So your approach is "he's fine to throw however many innings, if he gets hurt he was gonna get hurt anyway," then?

I would hope that the O's and their training staff would have a slightly more scientific approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your approach is "he's fine to throw however many innings, if he gets hurt he was gonna get hurt anyway," then?

I would hope that the O's and their training staff would have a slightly more scientific approach.

I'm sure they do. But I don't think it's all about innings, either. They might increase his innings threshold by some modest number, and then keep an eye out for signs of arm fatigue.

I'm not going to speculate about it, especially before Buck has even spoken about what the plan is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your approach is "he's fine to throw however many innings, if he gets hurt he was gonna get hurt anyway," then?

I would hope that the O's and their training staff would have a slightly more scientific approach.

DD said, there is no clear book on this, he has been cautious and at times they still get rehurt, and he has turned them lose and sometimes they do just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad Bundy is finally getting a chance to start. I had just about given up hope that he would ever be a contributing pitcher for the O's.

I expect the O's will treat him with kid gloves and have him on a strict pitch count. I wouldn't be surprised if he is pulled after 70 or even 60 pitches. The O's might stretch out the process of getting him to 90+ pitches for a month. I would be surprised if they let him exceed 100 pitches in a start this year.

Looking forward to a huge milestone for this promising young pitcher. I know a lot of us have pinned a lot of hopes on him. Go get 'em Dylan! :thumbsup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure they do. But I don't think it's all about innings, either. They might increase his innings threshold by some modest number, and then keep an eye out for signs of arm fatigue.

I'm not going to speculate about it, especially before Buck has even spoken about what the plan is now.

I'm pretty sure the O's are going to keep Bundy on a strict pitch count for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this. Bundy on a starter's schedule, out of the pen, multiple innings each time. He's become an effective member of the pen. If it ain't broke... Push him to about 100 innings this year doing what he's doing. Of course if he keeps being effective. Then next year starting for as long as he can go.

I agree with the idea of keeping him at 100 IP, but I really like the idea of him starting games instead of coming in to bail out someone else's mess every time. I think he works like a long man from the pen, except he starts the game. If Buck / DD avoid the temptation of stretching him out, we get the best of both worlds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the O's are going to keep Bundy on a strict pitch count for the rest of the season.

Sure they are. However at some point you have to take the bubble wrap off. I don't think there is any concrete science on how many innings are too many. 70, 80, 120? When and if he gets to 70-80 then I think they will reevaluate things then and proceed from there. As Frobby said you look for signs of fatigue. Loss of velocity, loss of command, etc. Considering how little he has pitch I think his command of pitches has been pretty good so far. The first 50 pitches he throws Sunday will be interesting. What comes next will be even more interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure they are. However at some point you have to take the bubble wrap off. I don't think there is any concrete science on how many innings are too many. 70, 80, 120? When and if he gets to 70-80 then I think they will reevaluate things then and proceed from there. As Frobby said you look for signs of fatigue. Loss of velocity, loss of command, etc. Considering how little he has pitch I think his command of pitches has been pretty good so far. The first 50 pitches he throws Sunday will be interesting. What comes next will be even more interesting.

You're right. There is no science to it. At one extreme you have Nolan Ryan who threw in the 90's as a 40 year old. On the other end of the spectrum you have teenagers blowing their arms out. There is no "sure way of dealing with pitchers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hypothetical: The Orioles put Bundy in the rotation and he wins more than he loses. The O's make the playoffs, Bundy pitches some postseason games and the O's win the World Series. Next spring, his arm starts to hurt and it's determined that he needs a second TJ surgery. He is never a successful major league pitcher again.

Worth it?

Absolutely...it might be another 30 years before we go back to the WS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. There is no science to it. At one extreme you have Nolan Ryan who threw in the 90's as a 40 year old. On the other end of the spectrum you have teenagers blowing their arms out. There is no "sure way of dealing with pitchers".

Nolan blew his arm out. Partial at first and the last pitch he threw complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • JD Martinez would be a more of the same kind of acquisition. He is not an impact bat and he is a periphery (around the margins) piece at this point. Why not set the bar higher and sign Alonso? Acquiring Pete Alonso allows you to move on from Mountcastle and put Mayo (where he belongs right now) DH. It also allows you to move on from O'Hearn.  Alonso gets everyday ABs and Mayo does. Those two things to a large degree help solve the lineup imbalance against LHP. I know Alonso will cost real money. But again who are we paying? The money is there. It's time to start using it (if we want to win in October).
    • Your full quote said to use him as a DH for 100+ games. If you are worried about him being covered through his injuries - how can you assume he wouldn't be injured at the end of the season, going into the playoffs?
    • Here’s an exercise… it’s the postseason and the bases are loaded. The Santa scenario. Who on our current roster would you rather have up over JD Martinez?  Same fact pattern as Santander’s AB. 
    • I think the title of this thread told you his status
    • Why did you pare down my quote about it being for the post season and not just 162?  People, always so quick to clown someone. Lmao. Damn. At least use my whole quote bro.  If you think that we don’t need at least one proven playoff bat then that’s ok. My point is, that we have enough 1B/DH options to carry JD through his ups/downs/injuries over 162 for his experience, leadership, and playoff experience.  You can disagree, but quote me right. 
    • It's kind of amazing to me how no one knows Suarez's free agent status. I've heard it both ways. He's Schrodinger's baseball player.
    • Since JD Martinez has a career OPS of .950 in the postseason across 12 series and 151 plate appearances, I am sure our FO will have no use for him.  A veteran player who has experienced a lot of postseason success rarely helps young teams get to that next level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...