Jump to content

Orioles Sign Edwin Jackson to a Minor League Deal


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

Eduardo A. Encina of the Baltimore Sun reports that the Orioles have agreed to a minor league contract with Edwin Jackson pending a physical.

Per Encina, Jackson's deal will include a June 1 opt-out clause. Assuming he passes his physical, he will report to extended spring training on Thursday. The veteran right-hander split his 2016 season between the Marlins and Padres. He struggled on the whole, posting a 5.89 ERA, 1.58 WHIP and 61/41 K/BB ratio in 84 innings. With the Orioles, he will serve as organizational depth, but could see major league time as the season progresses. Even if he does work his way into the mix with the O's, there is no fantasy intrigue here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, wildcard said:

Good signing.  Not a starter any more.   Had a good season as a reliever in 2015.   If they can get him back to that performance then they have some. 

2015,  3.07 ERA, 55.2 IP, 44H, 1.168 WHIP

Yep,def not a starter but no bad minor league deals. I like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think the odds are long that we see him in an Orioles ML uniform this year.    

 

21 minutes ago, dan-O said:

If we do, something has probably gone terribly wrong. 

It seems to me that every year there are at least a couple of guys who end up playing some games for us that you never would have expected going into the season.   Sometimes they're young guys and sometimes they're old guys.   So I wouldn't say that Jackson pitching for us was a sign that something had gone horribly wrong.     We had guys like Logan Ondrusek and Brian Duensing pitch for us last year.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

True, but I actually like our choices in the minors, both rotation and bullpen before he ever gets a chance.   I could probably think of at least 3 starters I'd go to before him and at least as many RH bullpen guys.

As of now, I'd agree with you.   I'm just saying that if Jackson got called up at some point, it wouldn't necessarily be because something's gone horribly wrong.    Maybe Jackson pitches lights out and earns it, rather than getting a call-up by default.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

As of now, I'd agree with you.   I'm just saying that if Jackson got called up at some point, it wouldn't necessarily be because something's gone horribly wrong.    Maybe Jackson pitches lights out and earns it, rather than getting a call-up by default.    

It's like the Johan Santana dream all over again.  Oh, What could have been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PaulFolk said:

If Jackson makes an appearance with the Orioles, it'll be his 12th major league team, one shy of Octavio Dotel's all-time record.

That's going to make it a tough choice for his HOF cap! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

 

It seems to me that every year there are at least a couple of guys who end up playing some games for us that you never would have expected going into the season.   Sometimes they're young guys and sometimes they're old guys.   So I wouldn't say that Jackson pitching for us was a sign that something had gone horribly wrong.     We had guys like Logan Ondrusek and Brian Duensing pitch for us last year.    

Loved Duensing's surprise one batter/one K appearance in the play-in game last year. (Not sarcastic.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...