Chris Davis 2019 and beyond

[weams]

4 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

What did Einstein say?  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?  

Einstein said so many things. 

Quote

Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.

 

[atomic]

Chris Davis has been fixed and will most likely be in the line up tomorrow.  

What is over under on the number of strikeouts on his first week back?   20?

[orioles119]

8 minutes ago, atomic said:

Chris Davis has been fixed and will most likely be in the line up tomorrow.  

What is over under on the number of strikeouts on his first week back?   20?

[OsFanSinceThe80s]

13 minutes ago, atomic said:

Chris Davis has been fixed and will most likely be in the line up tomorrow.  

What is over under on the number of strikeouts on his first week back?   20?

Did Buck say Davis was ready?  What does fixed mean?  Will Davis now pay attention to the pitcher during his at bats.

[Number5]

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Did Buck say Davis was ready?  What does fixed mean?  Will Davis now pay attention to the pitcher during his at bats.

[SteveA]

Chris Davis 2.0 debuts tonight.   He's taken time off, he's worked with Coolbaugh, he's worked with Brady.   He's been declared "ready".

This will be the Chris Davis 2.0 thread.  Chris Davis is hitting .150/.227/.227.

But not Chris Davis 2.0.   He hasn't batted yet.   Maybe he'll be better, maybe he'll be worse.   But we have a shiny new CD2.0 in the lineup tonight, so let's give him the benefit of the doubt.  In the Chris Davis 2.0 thread, the past is behind him, and we have an interesting rookie to watch and see if he's major league material or not.

[Can_of_corn]

Just now, SteveA said:

Chris Davis 2.0 debuts tonight.   He's taken time off, he's worked with Coolbaugh, he's worked with Brady.   He's been declared "ready".

This will be the Chris Davis 2.0 thread.  Chris Davis is hitting .150/.227/.227.

But not Chris Davis 2.0.   He hasn't batted yet.   Maybe he'll be better, maybe he'll be worse.   But we have a shiny new CD2.0 in the lineup tonight, so let's give him the benefit of the doubt.  In the Chris Davis 2.0 thread, the past is behind him, and we have an interesting rookie to watch and see if he's major league material or not.

Going to be really hard to be worse.

[mdbdotcom]

Would be great if he bats right-handed.

[fansince1988]

CD isn't done. I have a feeling he will breakout soon.

[DocJJ]

Why put him in against a Lefty?   That just doesn't make any sense.  Why not re-introduce him against a righty at least?

 

[Can_of_corn]

1 minute ago, DocJJ said:

Why put him in against a Lefty?   That just doesn't make any sense.  Why not re-introduce him against a righty at least?

 

Angelos made him do it. 

 

I would have waited until they were facing a RHP.  Maybe have him PH?

[SteveA]

Just now, DocJJ said:

Why put him in against a Lefty?   That just doesn't make any sense.  Why not re-introduce him against a righty at least?

 

Well, Buck said a few days ago that when Davis was declared "ready" he would go in the lineup whether it was vs a lefty or righty.   And his stats this year actually are a bit better, no I should say a bit less worse, vs lefties than vs righties.

Also, Trey Mancini missed last night with a sore neck.   If he is unavailable tonight too (which I don't know, just speculating) then you have to have at least one lefty in the lineup anyway.   Either Davis or Peterson or Rasmus.

[Chavez Ravine]

 

[Can_of_corn]

3 minutes ago, fansince1988 said:

CD isn't done. I have a feeling he will breakout soon.

A nice little string of competent at bats or 8 HR over two weeks scalding hot streak?

[Il BuonO]

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Going to be really hard to be worse.

He’s ready to put in the work.