Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Recoup?  That implies they're keeping him around to get back value.  Last year they would have been almost three wins to the better if they'd sent him off to Aruba to hang out with Sidney Ponson all year.  If he hits .200 with 17 homers and 200 Ks he'll likely be worth almost nothing while they're paying him $23M.  The money is gone, they're not getting any of it back, and unless he has a dramatic turn around they're not getting any production out of it. 

If he really is cooked, the Orioles gain nothing and lose a win or two from his replacement from having him hang around wishing he could still play Major League baseball.

I agree 100%. Ownership is desperately grasping for straws... or lost money. Would any other hitter with Davis type numbers  be in the league?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Natty said:

I agree 100%. Ownership is desperately grasping for straws... or lost money. Would any other hitter with Davis type numbers  be in the league?

If that hitter had a $161 million contract based on a couple of career years, yes. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I firmly believe it would depend on the team and their situation. 

I suppose if the Red Sox had given him this bad deal and the media was hounding them (as it would be up there), and they had a prospect at 1B, sure. 

I would say 95% of the time, that player would still be on the team's roster for at least part of this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

I suppose if the Red Sox had given him this bad deal and the media was hounding them (as it would be up there), and they had a prospect at 1B, sure. 

I would say 95% of the time, that player would still be on the team's roster for at least part of this year.

You think that between 28 and 29 teams would keep Davis on the roster after last season?  Lot of money or not he kills any contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

You think that between 28 and 29 teams would keep Davis on the roster after last season?  Lot of money or not he kills any contender.

I dunno what to tell you. Yes, I do. I think most contenders he would ride the bench if necessary for half a season. They would exhaust every option like the O's are doing now. That's what organizations do! 

The Sox ate $48 with Pablo. No one has eaten $90. 

I'm not saying these teams don't release him this year, just that they give him a couple months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

I dunno what to tell you. Yes, I do. I think most contenders he would ride the bench if necessary for half a season. They would exhaust every option like the O's are doing now. That's what organizations do! 

The Sox ate $48 with Pablo. No one has eaten $90. 

I'm not saying these teams don't release him this year, just that they give him a couple months. 

The only reason no team has eaten 90M is because no one signed to a meagdeal has been this bad this fast.

I think folks harping on the sheer size of the deal are missing that important fact.  The Davis deal has no comps, the closest is Hamilton and the Angels ate that contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I firmly believe it would depend on the team and their situation. 

True.   A rich, contending team might cut him like the Bosox did with the Panda (less money, same principle).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The only reason no team has eaten 90M is because no one signed to a meagdeal has been this bad this fast.

I think folks harping on the sheer size of the deal are missing that important fact.  The Davis deal has no comps, the closest is Hamilton and the Angels ate that contract.

Pujols has got 3 years left on his deal after providing negative WAR the last three seasons. Davis has him beat with 4 years left, but it is an interesting comp. Miguel Cabrera has 5 years left on his deal after being a negative value hitter the last two seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an age-old debate but it pisses me off that Davis is crippling the team with his salary. As hard as it's going to be the league needs to work to adopt the NFL salary structure. No player should be guaranteed a full salary, especially being that they're a depreciating asset. Guarantee the first few years and the rest should be on a "prove it" basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

Pujols has got 3 years left on his deal after providing negative WAR the last three seasons. Davis has him beat with 4 years left, but it is an interesting comp. Miguel Cabrera has 5 years left on his deal after being a negative value hitter the last two seasons. 

If you average fWAR and rWAR Pujols rates as above replacement last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

Pujols has got 3 years left on his deal after providing negative WAR the last three seasons. Davis has him beat with 4 years left, but it is an interesting comp. Miguel Cabrera has 5 years left on his deal after being a negative value hitter the last two seasons. 

At least by rWAR, Pujols has been positive two of the last three years, and Cabrera was positive last year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

The only reason no team has eaten 90M is because no one signed to a meagdeal has been this bad this fast.

I think folks harping on the sheer size of the deal are missing that important fact.  The Davis deal has no comps, the closest is Hamilton and the Angels ate that contract.

The Phils kept Ryan Howard for five years when he was more than a win below replacement in four of the five, including three in a row.  He was a .219 hitting, sub-.300 OBP first baseman with negative baserunning and -10 defense.  And they let him do that for 1500 PAs after his last positive WAR season.  Not quite Davis, but Davis hasn't done this four years in five.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jabba72 said:

Pujols has got 3 years left on his deal after providing negative WAR the last three seasons. Davis has him beat with 4 years left, but it is an interesting comp. Miguel Cabrera has 5 years left on his deal after being a negative value hitter the last two seasons. 

Cabrera was positive last year, and would have been slightly better than league average if he wasn't hurt and put up the same numbers as he did when he did play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

92 million owed for 4 years.   Spring Training has not gone well.  I would tell Davis  to get more gloves and he would be an utility fielder 1b, 3b, rf/ lf & occasionally hitting as a dh.  No reason stealing at bats from others or 1b fielding opportunities from Mancini.  Sunk money anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • This times 1000.   A five game losing streak where we’ve lost exactly 1.5 games in the standings, by the way. You would think we were suddenly ten games behind the Yankees (who’s asses we just finished kicking five days ago) with the way people act.    Good time for an OH vacation for me because the flop sweat around here is flooding the place. 
    • I don't know if anyone is questioning if the Orioles will still qualify for the postseason after this recent rough stretch. However, the concern that I am seeing/reading/hearing is that once October begins, we don't have the kind of pitching talent necessary to go deep into the Fall by winning multiple rounds against teams who have better pitching talent. 
    • I believe this is truly the "all in " year...not next year or the year after. After this year, it's conceivable we could lose Burnes, and Santander, and that would mean two of the best and(among) the most important players on the team. No Burnes(he'll command at least 30 million a year and likely more) would maybe give us ONE solid pitcher in Grod, and our outfield will be in flux. No, I think THIS is the year the Orioles have to win, and that means some dramatic, possibly risky trades at the break yield some significant upgrades to our beleaguered pitching both with starters and the pen. If we don't get it this year, we may never have a potential post season team in the next couple of years..not at this rate.
    • Luke Dickerson, SS, Morris Knolls HS, Rockaway, N.J. There are shades of Jackson Merrill and Sammy Stafura with Dickerson as a northeast/mid-atlantic prep shortstop who has received a lot of late helium this spring. He’s an offense-oriented righthanded hitter with a background as a talented hockey player. He might fit better at second base or center field, but teams like his hit/power combination enough to take him inside the first two rounds. He had a solid showing at the draft combine last week, as well. 
    • As the bluejays continue to fade, I cant help but think that they would be a trade fit if they decide to sell.  Specifically Gausman and Berrios. Gausman is under contract for 2 seasons after this one, and Berrios has 4 years with an opt out after 2 years. So you would essentially have both of those guys for 2.5 years which would be a big boost for 2024, and the coming years with Burnes likely gone and Bradish out for 2025. They are both on hefty contracts (for Orioles standards) but with our payroll and new ownership group you would think that wouldnt be a huge problem. Not sure what the asking price would be for one of, or both, of those guys but worth looking into. I know its hard to look at trading within the division, especially what would potentially be a "blockbuster" type of  deal but I just dont see a ton of options on the trade market right now outside of the White Sox, A's and Rockies and none of those teams can match what the bluejays have to offer.
    • He was all of that yes, but nothing close to Gunner so far or Cal's best year, and you also forgot about Eddie. not to mention Palmer in the 70,s
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...