Jump to content

The team I will be watching in 2020


wildcard

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

First Base/DH -  Ryan Mountcastle.  Since the O's will have Santander, Hays and Diaz is the majors when they contend there is little reason to put Mountcastle in left field for a year.   He should refined his defense at 1B.  He begin 2020 at Norfolk and is promoted to he majors  a month later. 

Shortstop - Richie Martin  - I don't know if he has the bat to be successful in the majors but I like his defense.  Defensive metric suck, so I throw them out the window.   I think he plays all season at Norfolk   He may even play a month at 2021 at  AAA.  If he hits he is in the majors after that.

Left Field - Anthony Santander - With  the O's.

Center Field - Austin Hays-  With the O's.

Right Field - Yusniel  Diaz - Plays all season with Norfolk.   Is promoted to the O's one month into the 2021 season.

DH/1B  -  Trey Mancini -  He will play right field for the O's in 2020. But he will be 1B/DH  a month into the 2021 season.

John Means- With the O's.

 

Your post assumes a whole lot of straight line progression and no changes or surprises. I doubt that's ever happened with any organization.

There's a good chance Mancini and Means are dealt for prospects soon between now and July. 

Your conclusion about Mountcastle is based on other players. I disagree with that. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position that he can play well, meaning a left fielder is more valuable than a first baseman. In other words, the O's won't say....well, even though Mountcastle is a better overall player as a left fielder than Santander, since we already have Santander there, we have to find an open spot for Mountcastle. 

I think they'll do the opposite. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position he's able to play and the other guy will move. 

Richie Martin's destination will depend on whether the O's bring in someone between now and opening day who is better able to handle short. I happen to like Martin but I doubt anyone views him as a long term fixture. He's patching an obvious hole until someone else provides a better patch. And I don't see any circumstance where he would be held back in AAA in '21 to manipulate service time. He's not the profile for that in any way. 

And I believe in Diaz but he's anything but a sure thing and most definitely not a sure thing within the next year. 

As an example, 365 days ago, would you have made the same predictions about Martin, Santander, Diaz, Means, et al, that you do today? Things change. For better and for worse. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Your post assumes a whole lot of straight line progression and no changes or surprises. I doubt that's ever happened with any organization.

There's a good chance Mancini and Means are dealt for prospects soon between now and July. 

Your conclusion about Mountcastle is based on other players. I disagree with that. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position that he can play well, meaning a left fielder is more valuable than a first baseman. In other words, the O's won't say....well, even though Mountcastle is a better overall player as a left fielder than Santander, since we already have Santander there, we have to find an open spot for Mountcastle. 

I think they'll do the opposite. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position he's able to play and the other guy will move. 

Richie Martin's destination will depend on whether the O's bring in someone between now and opening day who is better able to handle short. I happen to like Martin but I doubt anyone views him as a long term fixture. He's patching an obvious hole until someone else provides a better patch. And I don't see any circumstance where he would be held back in AAA in '21 to manipulate service time. He's not the profile for that in any way. 

And I believe in Diaz but he's anything but a sure thing and most definitely not a sure thing within the next year. 

As an example, 365 days ago, would you have made the same predictions about Martin, Santander, Diaz, Means, et al, that you do today? Things change. For better and for worse. 

Elias is not trading Means.  He is cheap,  he as good last year. and he eats innings.  A trade is not happening for Means this year.

Every rating I have seen on Mountcaslte say he is slow.   The outfield is probably not the best place for his skills.   1B is probably his best shot at playing a defensive position that may be positive to good along with his plus bat.

Not prospect is a sure thing.   Any of them can step in a hole and break a leg or be like  Mullins and not be able to hit a major league break pitch.  It happens.

You cut off the end on my post that says "This is if all goes well, which it will not."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The O's are putting more technology, analysis and coaching into player development then we have every seen before.  I am hoping it actually helps players develop to higher levels of performance.

Agreed.

But don't players develop on different time frames? Isn't it reasonable to understand that some guys have more development needed and some guys less? 

I don't think it works to say "this guy had 12 AA starts in '19 so he'll be promoted to the O's on August 11, 2020". They'll be promoted when they've mastered changes and improvements as well as possible. Some will come quicker, some slower and some not at all. And some will get hurt. And some will hit a wall. 

I'd love to see Toby Welk rocket through the minors. I love that guy. But he wouldn't be first guy to tear it up in the low levels only to hit a wall at AA or AAA. I really hope he doesn't. But you never know, even with huge advances in player development. 

Even the great astros system had to go buy a right fielder cause they couldn't develop one. And now they'd be happy to give Reddick away but no one will take him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Elias is not trading Means.  He is cheap,  he as good last year. and he eats innings.  A trade is not happening for Means this year.

Every rating I have seen on Mountcaslte say he is slow.   The outfield is probably not the best place for his skills.   1B is probably his best shot at playing a defensive position that may be positive to good along with his plus bat.

Not prospect is a sure thing.   Any of them can step in a hole and break a leg or be like  Mullins and not be able to hit a major league break pitch.  It happens.

You cut off the end on my post that says "This is if all goes well, which it will not."

There are surprises, every year, good and bad, in every organization. 

2 years ago, would you have bet on Forrest Whitley or John Means? The yankees, with all their technology and brain power, wouldn't complete a trade with the Pirates for Gerrit Cole because they didn't believe he'd become what he has. Now look what they've paid to get him. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping for second half Baysox with Rutschman and Rodriguez joining Hall there.

With all due respect to the 4-15 section of the list, a next good team milestone will be getting those three together.

The Santander/Hays/Diaz/Mountcastle basket is akin to the Akin/Baumann/Kremer/Lowther basket - we won't go 8-for-8 but hopefully end up with 5-6 glue guys and not just a couple.  Then perhaps we earn a superstar's serious attention in 2-3 years to crescendo.  

There's a 99th percentile outcome where in mid-2022 the rotation is Rodriguez/Hall/Hancock/Rocker and Rutschman has a $200M companion in the heart of the lineup.  The team's depth fills in well or poorly with as many of the glue guys as the high minors group ends up on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

Any team would be thrilled to develop a Ben McDonald.

Any team would be thrilled to develop a Sidney Ponson as well. 13 rWAR through 6 seasons and traded for a bunch of prospects to a contender.

Not to mention Zack Britton, Jake Arrieta, Brian Roberts, Jerry Hairston, Zach Davies, Josh Hader, BJ Ryan, Arthur Rhodes, Jose Mesa, Armando Benitez, Chris Hoiles, ...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Any team would be thrilled to develop a Sidney Ponson as well. 13 rWAR through 6 seasons and traded for a bunch of prospects to a contender.

Not to mention Zack Britton, Jake Arrieta, Brian Roberts, Jerry Hairston, Zach Davies, Josh Hader, BJ Ryan, Arthur Rhodes, Jose Mesa, Armando Benitez, Chris Hoiles, ...

Hoiles was in AA when we traded Fred Lynn for him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, weams said:

Neither will have that chance, if they are good enough - they will pitch in Baltimore this year. 

Yep - part of what makes farm rankings so squishy and arbitrary.  That Austin Hays didn't play Game 162 doesn't change him at all, but it may bump our org rank some towards upper middle class.

In 2020 we'll have does Yusniel get 130 AB's and Baumann/Kremer 50 innings?  Baumann's initial assignment will give a clue.

To the extent I feel like 2020 has a little upside beyond 2019 at the major league level, it's in interesting pitchers making a bigger percentage of the starts.  This year we may nudge past the Wojo-style we need to purchase another team's AAA guy to make it through the year.

Next offseason probably figures to be Orioles Farm Peak, as 2020 pick 1-2 should profile ahead of Mountcastle, but then after that 2021 pick 1-X has Rutschman's shoes to fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t worry about any of these guy until get here and perform. 
 

The Orioles last 35+ years of organizational player development has been dreadful. You can Almost count the impact guys after Cal on 1 hand (not counting guys we traded for).

Boddicker, Olson, Bedard, Machado, Schoop, Wieters, Finley, Harnisch, Mussina, and Mancini. Perhaps McDonald but I’d argue that he and Wieters underperformed based on draft hype/position.

Did I miss anyone that is/was truly a star?

I don’t know what your definition of a star is, but there’s a guy we produced who has 2,355 hits and counting who’s not on your list.   Also a guy who’s on the Hall of Fame ballot this year.   A guy who had one of the best seasons for a closer ever.    Off the top of my head.   

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Estevez interests me. He was AL relief PoM inJune. Seems to have figured himself out since leaving Colorado. Was good last year though appeared to tire by the end of the season. He's throwing strikes and not walking guys. According to MLBTR, "Estévez is making $6.75MM before returning to free agency next winter. He’s owed just under $3MM for the rest of the season. That’d drop to roughly $2.18MM in remaining commitments by the deadline." That means if you take on all of the contract you may not need to give up too much in prospect capital. 
    • Zero.  Again, he’s 4th in all of MLB in OAA, has a 116OPS+ and anyone can see he’s hit into a ton of bad luck.  His statcast #s are elite.  I think you are making emotional decisions and letting a few bad games cloud your judgement.  Kjerstad cane onto the scene with a bang, but doesn’t provide the all around benefits that Cowser does.  I think Kjerstad is fantastic.  I want both of them + Mayo on the roster.  
    • Certainly agree on needing a high leverage BP arm or two as well, but that’s beside the point. If (big if) Skubal is legitimately obtainable, I’d be willing to part with one of the big three, all I’m saying. A Burnes - Skubal - GRod trio to go along with our offense would be ideal for October. 
    • The difference between the CWS and A’s is that the CWS play in a weak division. They get 4 guys that plug holes and could be around .500 in that division next year. At the end of the day this is the same package that go thrown around all offseason for Cease.  So it was ok for Cease, but not Crochet who has .5 years of control more, and we’d have him for 3 playoffs. But I guess the milkman Cow gimmick matters that much to people. It’s cool and all, but I’d take a lefty SP for 3 playoffs. 
    • Vespi is definitely ahead of Krook, Gonzalez and McGough, but Krook may just have gotten called up over the other two because he was already on the 40. They may want to keep McGough and Gonzalez in the minors this year so they don’t burn an option year on them if possible. And both probably benefit from more AAA reps anyway, Gonzalez was in international leagues for a couple years and hasn’t performed like this at AAA before and it’s McGough’s first experience at AAA. The most interesting thing for lefties next year is if they hang onto Akin’s last option this year. Then next year they could choose to option Akin and hang onto Vespi once he’s out of options. But I think Akin is easily the most talented of this group and his numbers overall are good, he’s just often frustrating.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...