Jump to content

No more argument to play Chris Davis


accinfo

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Yeah, there is no reason for sending your worst hitter up there as a pinch hitter.

Some kind of double fake, right.  Hilarious.  "Muhahahahaha!  They'll be rattled by our curious behavior!  We've got them now!"

They pinched the worst hitter on the team.   Smack in the face of reason. :)

...but he has been making good contact.  

...when he's not striking out.

Wonderful logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the 28 man roster and Bowie a phone call away, there is absolutely NO reason Davis should EVER see the field. Like it or not, we have a chance to make the playoffs this season, and while that could change with an extended losing streak, it's true at the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, O-The-Memories said:

We didn't have anyone else who could pinch hit on the bench? If Davis was the only option (which I really don't think he was), then it was the right call I suppose. Mullins is even worse with the bat than Davis. I wish we could get rid of both since neither brings value to the club.

There is no comparison to the two players.  Mullins is a very good outfielder and is going to be needed to play CF most days while Hayes is out.  I don't have great expectations that he Mullins can hit at the major league level but I don't think there is a final judgement on that.  That can't be said about Chris Davis.  He is finished.  You can live with a weak Mullins bat in the lineup for his defense as long as you don't handicap yourself playing Davis everyday.  Again like I said in the initial post in this thread you have a clear choice in Sisco and Davis and it shouldn't be a difficult choice.  Maybe Sisco proves in the next couple of weeks he can't deliver either but he has done enough to earn a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, accinfo said:

There is no comparison to the two players.  Mullins is a very good outfielder and is going to be needed to play CF most days while Hayes is out.  I don't have great expectations that he Mullins can hit at the major league level but I don't think there is a final judgement on that.  That can't be said about Chris Davis.  He is finished.  You can live with a weak Mullins bat in the lineup for his defense as long as you don't handicap yourself playing Davis everyday.  Again like I said in the initial post in this thread you have a clear choice in Sisco and Davis and it shouldn't be a difficult choice.  Maybe Sisco proves in the next couple of weeks he can't deliver either but he has done enough to earn a chance. 

I don't grade anyone with Mullins' arm a very good outfielder, left fielder maybe but not center or right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually TRY to see if I can come up with the rationale for a managerial decision before I condemn it out of hand.   So here is what I am coming up with:

If we assume Iglesias couldn't play because of the quad (which is a dubious assumption because he had played the two days before and DHed once when he couldn't play the field)...

Then our options were Mullins, Holaday, and Davis.

Down 1 with one out in the 9th, out chances of stringing together multiple hits to score were getting low.   It would take 3 singles, or a walk and 2 singles, or a single and an extrabase hit, and we only had one out left to play with.

So maybe Hyde concluded our best chance to tie the game was to hit a HR.

Based on seeing Davis throughout June camp, in BP and intrasquad and exhibition games, plus BP during the season, maybe Hyde honestly thought that Davis had the best chance of the three guys of putting a bat on a ball and hitting it out of the park,

There, that's the best I can come up with.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...I did catch myself having to bite my lip and just let it roll, but with Nunoz not scooping that ball and letting the winning run score on that bad throw, it made me wonder why Davis hadn't spelled him to start that inning.  That was the top of the 8th, I think.  Maybe 7th.  Davis is a plus fielder and should be utilized in those situations, but why a double negative hitter is pinching is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, drjohnnyfeva said:

...I did catch myself having to bite my lip and just let it roll, but with Nunoz not scooping that ball and letting the winning run score on that bad throw, it made me wonder why Davis hadn't spelled him to start that inning.  That was the top of the 8th, I think.  Maybe 7th.  Davis is a plus fielder and should be utilized in those situations, but why a double negative hitter is pinching is beyond me.

Davis is not a plus fielder.  I guess in the nebulous world of first base fielding metrics he might have qualified as plus for a season or two but not at this point in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, drjohnnyfeva said:

...I did catch myself having to bite my lip and just let it roll, but with Nunoz not scooping that ball and letting the winning run score on that bad throw, it made me wonder why Davis hadn't spelled him to start that inning.  That was the top of the 8th, I think.  Maybe 7th.  Davis is a plus fielder and should be utilized in those situations, but why a double negative hitter is pinching is beyond me.

Nunez was due up first in the bottom of the eighth, I think you want his bat in there in a tie game.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • This is silly.    At any point, he could get hurt, have a down year, etc.. He is an Oriole for the next 4 years.  He will make around 50 million for the next 4 years. So, if you pay him 70ishM for 2 FA years, that is a 6/120 extension that is basically giving him all the money he will make the next 6 years.     After that, he gets opt outs for several years at big money and gets total security. It's actually a bad contract for the team as all the risk is on them. The only downside for Gunnar on this deal is if he stays completely healthy and his performance maintains at this level for 4 more years. If that happens, he probably loses 8-20 million (depending on where contracts go) for those 2 years and then he can still go get his 400M contract. So, he risks losing a little money for a ton of guaranteed money that gives him total protection against everything and he still goes into FA at an age where he can get the mega deal. Hes not turning that down
    • Which one you want pitching 5 innings for you?  Playoff games starter will typically go 5.  Maybe 6. 
    • Hall (knee) will join Triple-A Nashville on Tuesday to resume his rehab assignment, Adam McCalvy of MLB.com reports. Hall experienced a setback with his sprained left knee during his second rehab appearance May 23. He's expected to eventually require a platelet-rich plasma injection or possibly surgery for the knee, but for now, he'll attempt to pitch through the injury. Given that he's been on the injured list since April 20 and hasn't made a rehab appearance in about three weeks, Hall will likely require multiple outings at Nashville to get fully stretched out before he's an option for the Milwaukee rotation.
    • He's on pace to land a guaranteed contract in the $400-500 million dollar range at like 27 years old and his agent is Scott freakin' Boras. Absolutely nothing about that screams "I am going to sell even a single free agent year." Will he listen to extension offers? Probably. Will he actually accept one? Probably not.
    • Do you actually watch the MLB postseason?  Most teams get their starters out by the 6th inning.
    • The whole “the key with Crochet” is exactly why trading for him makes no sense. On top of that, how does he bounce back next year after throwing so many more innings than he ever has? Im not questioning his talent, his upside, age, service time or anything.  It’s all on the side of the team that has him. But they are going to want multiple top 50 type prospects for a guy with ace potential and a lot of service time.  His name shouldn’t even be mentioned imo.
    • Suarez has not had one single quality start this season. While I love what he has given us, he is the classic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher, which is fine, especially for the regular season as long as you have other starters (like Burnes) who can give consistent length. The problem with that for the post season is that forces your middle relievers into the game against teams with the best offenses. I’m not confident that the odds are necessarily stacked in our favor in some of those matchups. But hey you never know, Akin sure surprised me on Friday with a stellar outing.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...