Jump to content

A few tidbits.....


bigbird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I just find it hard to beleive that 15 million per for a five year deal is a slap in the face. Hell i wish soemone would slap my face for that. It is going to get to be where the average fan can't afford to go to sporting events. Well for professional sports anyway.

It is a slap in the face when you take in the context of the other types of offers he will be getting. That is less than the amount Texas offered him for an extension and less than Atlanta was reportedly offering.

In the open market, he is obviously going to go for more than that.

If the Orioles think they can appease the fan base by just throwing a token, obviously low-ball offer at Teixeira, I'd hope they are sadly mistaken.

If you aren't serious about making a legitimate push for him, just move along to other options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miguel Cabrera was 25 when he got his deal. He also could play LF, 3b, and 1b. Before this season he put up 3, 150 OPS+ seasons. He is behind Pujols , but not far.

Tex will be 29. He has put back to back 150 OPS+ seasons. He plays 1b and great at it. Miguel Cabrera is definitely worth more than Tex, but I think the most I give Tex is 18 million.

Side note: I hope we trade Roberts and not bother extending.

He can play them, but he cannot play them well! He is getting closer and closer to a DH spot with each passing season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just find it hard to beleive that 15 million per for a five year deal is a slap in the face. Hell i wish soemone would slap my face for that. It is going to get to be where the average fan can't afford to go to sporting events. Well for professional sports anyway.

Let's say you put yourself out on the market as available for employment. A potential employer with a terrible history and a glimmer of hope for the future comes running and screaming, "We want YOU, Tx Oriole!!!". You arrange an interview despite having the impression that the company's really not going to be successful unless (in addition to trying to acquire you) they change directions in a big way. Even your co-workers are snickering and trying to talk you out of the interview. "Man, are you crazy? They have been in a downward spiral for 11 years! There are at least 5 other places that I'm sure would hire you. Companies with a track record of success! Companies that frequently purge themselves of the deadwood. Companies that put their employees in positions to succeed. And most of all, companies that have GREAT relationships with their customers!"

The lengthy interview process goes well despite how much different it is than most other interviews you've been on. At the end of the day, the company representative smiles arrogantly as he says, "Tx Oriole, you'd be a great fit for our organization. We want you to come aboard. We realize our customers are disappearing by the minute, and even the ones that are still around are disgusted with our products. We also want you to know there's a real good chance you'll be surrounded by inferior talent, but hey! It's not as inferior as it's been in some years! And trust us...we're working on it! Aside from all that, we want to hire you. We need you and we think you'll be prit-teeee happy with the number we're prepared to offer."

When that offer turns out to be 10-20% less than what all the reputable, established companies offered you, you'd feel like your time had been wasted and your face had been slapped.

The Orioles have almost no leverage with Texiera or any other free agent for that matter. That is, except for money. No offense to these guys, but Nick Markakis, Adam Jones, and Matt Wieters aren't enough to attract top-tier talent to Baltimore. I've contended for several years that it's going to take overpaying and I think it will hold true again this off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tex has performed better than Miguel Cabrera this season both offensively and defensively and has almost been on par with A-Rod. He has a lifetime .919 OPS and has eclipsed a .950 OPS the past two seasons hitting 30+ HR and having 100+ RBI for 5 straight seasons. And he'll probably do that for another 4-5 seasons if not more. He's also a two time GG winner.

Why isn't he worth 18-20 million a year in this market?

I hate myself for even thinking like Boras, but there are 2 aspects here. First on field performance. Second face of the franchise and PR value. While I think the Mariners of Randy Johnson, Griffey, and ARod proved that it takes 25 good players to reach the WS, I see the value of Tex as a player + a symbol of the FO's committment to a winning team. Of the every day 9 starters, the O's currently have 3 players of contender quality and 2 possibles. Roberts, Markakis, and Jones are contender quality. Wieters and Huff are maybes. Mora's bounce back year was nice, but there is little doubt that he is on the downside of his career. As for pitchers, Guthrie is the only proven commidity. Johnson and Sherrill are maybes. The rest of the team, ie. 18 players are not MLB quality let alone AL east contender quality. Let's get realistic. If the FO loves the AA and A pitchers act on it. Ignore FA pitchers and put the AA pitchers into the fire. Could it be worse than 2008?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate myself for even thinking like Boras, but there are 2 aspects here. First on field performance. Second face of the franchise and PR value. While I think the Mariners of Randy Johnson, Griffey, and ARod proved that it takes 25 good players to reach the WS, I see the value of Tex as a player + a symbol of the FO's committment to a winning team. Of the every day 9 starters, the O's currently have 3 players of contender quality and 2 possibles. Roberts, Markakis, and Jones are contender quality. Wieters and Huff are maybes. Mora's bounce back year was nice, but there is little doubt that he is on the downside of his career. As for pitchers, Guthrie is the only proven commidity. Johnson and Sherrill are maybes. The rest of the team, ie. 18 players are not MLB quality let alone AL east contender quality. Let's get realistic. If the FO loves the AA and A pitchers act on it. Ignore FA pitchers and put the AA pitchers into the fire. Could it be worse than 2008?

Each season we ask...could it be worse than this year? Regrettably, the answer is YES, it can still get worse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say you put yourself out on the market as available for employment. A potential employer with a terrible history and a glimer of hope for the future comes running and screaming, "We want YOU, Tx Oriole!!!". You arrange an interview despite having the impression that the company's really not going to be successful unless (in addition to trying to acquire you) they change directions in a big way. Even your co-workers are snickering and trying to talk you out of the interview. "Man, are you crazy? They have been in a downward spiral for 11 years! There are at least 5 other places that I'm sure would hire you. Companies with a track record of success! Companies that frequently purge themselves of the deadwood. Companies that put their employees in positions to succeed. And most of all, companies that have GREAT relationships with their customers!"

The lengthy interview process goes well despite how much different it is than most other interviews you've been on. At the end of the day, the company representative smiles arrogantly as he says, "Tx Oriole, you'd be a great fit for our organization. We want you to come aboard. We realize our customers are disappearing by the minute, and even the ones that are still around are disgusted with our products. We also want you to know there's a real good chance you'll be surrounded by inferior talent, but hey! It's not as inferior as it's been in some years! And trust us...we're working on it! Aside from all that, we want to hire you. We need you and we think you'll be prit-teeee happy with the number we're prepared to offer."

When that offer turns out to be 10-20% less than what all the reputable, established companies offered you, you'd feel like your time had been wasted and your face had been slapped.

The Orioles have almost no leverage with Texiera or any other free agent for that matter. That is, except for money. No offense to these guys, but Nick Markakis, Adam Jones, and Matt Wieters aren't enough to attract top-tier talent to Baltimore. I've contended for several years that it's going to take overpaying and I think it will hold true again this off-season.

Well done sir!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say you put yourself out on the market as available for employment. A potential employer with a terrible history and a glimer of hope for the future comes running and screaming, "We want YOU, Tx Oriole!!!". You arrange an interview despite having the impression that the company's really not going to be successful unless (in addition to trying to acquire you) they change directions in a big way. Even your co-workers are snickering and trying to talk you out of the interview. "Man, are you crazy? They have been in a downward spiral for 11 years! There are at least 5 other places that I'm sure would hire you. Companies with a track record of success! Companies that frequently purge themselves of the deadwood. Companies that put their employees in positions to succeed. And most of all, companies that have GREAT relationships with their customers!"

The lengthy interview process goes well despite how much different it is than most other interviews you've been on. At the end of the day, the company representative smiles arrogantly as he says, "Tx Oriole, you'd be a great fit for our organization. We want you to come aboard. We realize our customers are disappearing by the minute, and even the ones that are still around are disgusted with our products. We also want you to know there's a real good chance you'll be surrounded by inferior talent, but hey! It's not as inferior as it's been in some years! And trust us...we're working on it! Aside from all that, we want to hire you. We need you and we think you'll be prit-teeee happy with the number we're prepared to offer."

When that offer turns out to be 10-20% less than what all the reputable, established companies offered you, you'd feel like your time had been wasted and your face had been slapped.

The Orioles have almost no leverage with Texiera or any other free agent for that matter. That is, except for money. No offense to these guys, but Nick Markakis, Adam Jones, and Matt Wieters aren't enough to attract top-tier talent to Baltimore. I've contended for several years that it's going to take overpaying and I think it will hold true again this off-season.

Very, very true my friend. It brings up two issues, do you want to be a star player on a losing team, or a good player on a winning team. Being the star is great when you are coming up on FA, but when you are signing what could be your last contract as a professional, you don't really want to sell yourself short do you? Also, it brings up the issue, using your business analogy, do you take a comparable offer from a worse company because you are comfortable and happy there? I guess the best comparison I can get is the media scrutiny. NYY isn't very good right now either, and anyone thinking they are getting back to where they were in 1 offseason doesn't know enough about baseball. The older guys that didn't break down last season, will this season, and they will have just as many holes, just in different places as this season. Unless they sign Sabathia, Sheets, Pettite, Tex, and O. Hudson, it's looking bleak for them.

On the one hand I hope that Tex would feel comfortable here, see enough potential to compete in 2 years, and be ok with an offer within 5% of other offers, but on the other, should we scout ahead and see what the FA market looks like in a year or two when we are better positioned to contend, and after we have resigned some young players to long extensions? Chicken or the egg....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that Nick still has some hard feelings toward this organization. Doubt that he accepts any extension

Sorry. Disagree.

Nick Markakis just bought a huge house in Monkton. If he wasn't planning to stay he could've just as easily settled in a nice upscale high rise apartment and cut bait when the lease was up. He's not going anywhere, not for a little while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. Disagree.

Nick Markakis just bought a huge house in Monkton. If he wasn't planning to stay he could've just as easily settled in a nice upscale high rise apartment and cut bait when the lease was up. He's not going anywhere, not for a little while.

Nick lived in the city for a couple of years and found it too noisy and crowded for his liking. I suppose he could have rented a house on a bunch of property out in the country or at least bought one that was already built rather than custom design one, but I think his housing choice was more the product of his tastes and what he could afford than any sort of long-term commitment. Remember, at the point when he must have started building it, mortgage loans were still easy to get and not too many people envisioned the housing resale market tanking like it has. Lots of people in their 20's, from middle class people I know up to people with incomes like his, were buying houses and thinking of them as a good investment even if they weren't going to stay more than a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. Disagree.

Nick Markakis just bought a huge house in Monkton. If he wasn't planning to stay he could've just as easily settled in a nice upscale high rise apartment and cut bait when the lease was up. He's not going anywhere, not for a little while.

Nick lived in the city for a couple of years and found it too noisy and crowded for his liking. I suppose he could have rented a house on a bunch of property out in the country or at least bought one that was already built rather than custom design one, but I think his housing choice was more the product of his tastes and what he could afford than any sort of long-term commitment. Remember, at the point when he must have started building it, mortgage loans were still easy to get and not too many people envisioned the housing resale market tanking like it has. Lots of people in their 20's, from middle class people I know up to people with incomes like his, were buying houses and thinking of them as a good investment even if they weren't going to stay more than a few years.
Holy speculation, Batman!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say you put yourself out on the market as available for employment. A potential employer with a terrible history and a glimer of hope for the future comes running and screaming, "We want YOU, Tx Oriole!!!". You arrange an interview despite having the impression that the company's really not going to be successful unless (in addition to trying to acquire you) they change directions in a big way. Even your co-workers are snickering and trying to talk you out of the interview. "Man, are you crazy? They have been in a downward spiral for 11 years! There are at least 5 other places that I'm sure would hire you. Companies with a track record of success! Companies that frequently purge themselves of the deadwood. Companies that put their employees in positions to succeed. And most of all, companies that have GREAT relationships with their customers!"

The lengthy interview process goes well despite how much different it is than most other interviews you've been on. At the end of the day, the company representative smiles arrogantly as he says, "Tx Oriole, you'd be a great fit for our organization. We want you to come aboard. We realize our customers are disappearing by the minute, and even the ones that are still around are disgusted with our products. We also want you to know there's a real good chance you'll be surrounded by inferior talent, but hey! It's not as inferior as it's been in some years! And trust us...we're working on it! Aside from all that, we want to hire you. We need you and we think you'll be prit-teeee happy with the number we're prepared to offer."

When that offer turns out to be 10-20% less than what all the reputable, established companies offered you, you'd feel like your time had been wasted and your face had been slapped.

The Orioles have almost no leverage with Texiera or any other free agent for that matter. That is, except for money. No offense to these guys, but Nick Markakis, Adam Jones, and Matt Wieters aren't enough to attract top-tier talent to Baltimore. I've contended for several years that it's going to take overpaying and I think it will hold true again this off-season.

Very, very, well said. Rep given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have almost no leverage with Texiera or any other free agent for that matter. That is, except for money. No offense to these guys, but Nick Markakis, Adam Jones, and Matt Wieters aren't enough to attract top-tier talent to Baltimore. I've contended for several years that it's going to take overpaying and I think it will hold true again this off-season.

This is really the bottom line. At some point we'll have to pay someone. Why not Teixeira and why not now? This is why I voted for 8 years (last 2 should be options) at 20 mil per year.

Pay this man, resign Roberts and Kakes, get a decent option at ss (now) and 3b (after next year) and let the entire focus of this franchise be on our pitching for the next 5 years. We'd basically be loaded with position players.

Note, we can likely get another Matusz-like pitcher at #5 next year as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really the bottom line. At some point we'll have to pay someone. Why not Teixeira and why not now? This is why I voted for 8 years (last 2 should be options) at 20 mil per year.

Pay this man, resign Roberts and Kakes, get a decent option at ss (now) and 3b (after next year) and let the entire focus of this franchise be on our pitching for the next 5 years. We'd basically be loaded with position players.

Note, we can likely get another Matusz-like pitcher at #5 next year as well.

Well didn't we overpay Huff? and Herndandez? and Gibbons? and Payton? and Baez? Granted, a little bit of restraint and decent scouting could've avoided those problems... but the Rays don't pay much for their team. Why can't we model our team after them, instead of the Yankees like you are offering here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SBaseball, your point is very well taken. I guess one point i should ahve made was that we have all read that Andy M. keeps things clse to the vest. BB waass getting info from his source. But waht he said may not be correct. NOthing aginst BB or his source. We just do not know what Andy M. will do. He may talk Angelos into the money to get Tex. It seems like some are getting upset over stuff we don't have all the facts on. I am not totally against signing Tex. He will fill a need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • My thoughts: Judge looks like he's not aging well. He just looks un-athletic. I anticipate regression with him becoming a one-dimensional player soon. Soto is a good hitter. I'm not sure why anyone would pitch to him. He's the one guy in the lineup you don't let beat you. Stanton is now what Judge looks like he will become. He's a shadow of his former self. Their closer is very good.  Rodon looks like his best days are behind him. Completely hittable. To use an old Chick Hearn phrase, "the mustard has come off the hotdog," with regard to Cortez. He's not fooling guys anymore. The franchise in general is very un-Yankeelike. They used to be the organization that was light-years ahead of everyone else. Not anymore. They just don't play fundementally sound baseball anymore. Their defense was exposed in the series. Their situational hitting was poor. Boone seems a bit lost at times. They just don't look like the Yankees. 
    • I chuckled when I checked the box score. 0-2 with 4 BB is a very "minor league pitching" kind of line. 
    • I think Holliday is still the priority. I honestly think his swing was ready for AA/AAA pitchers, but not ML stuff. He has to shorten up. Get to contact first. Get to power later. He was trying to just jump to power and his swing got long. That said, his defense needed work too, so another month+ and my guess is he'll have re-established himself. I think Mayo started similarly to Holliday actually. Put up some video game numbers early, but struck out a ton and made bad errors. I really think both came out big D swinging and trying to mash the league. That won't play at the majors. You have to walk before you run. I think Mayo's doing that now. He's k'ing less and I haven't heard bad reports about his defense recently, though I could just be in the dark. I can see Mayo getting the Gunnar treatment, but I could also see him forcing his way up earlier.  So Holliday first, but not assuming that Mayo will wait until September. 
    • Playing catch is better than being fully shut down. If there was something more serious, he wouldn't be playing catch. I think they're probably continuing to test the level of inflammation to determine when to start ramping him back up? Just guessing.  There's also no rush to fire him back up, so you might as well take your time with it. 
    • Oh man, I was expecting CoC to start a thread about Elly De La Cruz.  
    • It is remarkable to have three shortstops at age 21-22 with the talent of Henderson, De La Cruz and Witt all blossoming into superstars in such a short time window. It would be interesting to see a real deep dive analysis with assessments from scouts and execs comparing the three. I have a bias toward Gunnar and see him far more than the other two, but objectively, I am not even sure who you would pick if you could take one of the three. It would be a hard call. One good thing is that after this weekend, the O's won't face either Witt or De La Cruz again this season, until October, if then.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...