Jump to content

2021 5th round pick (137): Carlos Tavera - RHP - (Senior) Texas-Arlington


Recommended Posts

ProspectsLive had him as the 160th prospect with this to say, "Tavera has been up to 95 with a high spin breaking ball and a model release height. He's a three-pitch arm with starter projection and some velocity gains potentially ahead. Evaluators believe he could be a starter that sits 93-95 with an above average breaking ball and a usable changeup."

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, acslater said:

ProspectsLive had him as the 160th prospect with this to say, "Tavera has been up to 95 with a high spin breaking ball and a model release height. He's a three-pitch arm with starter projection and some velocity gains potentially ahead. Evaluators believe he could be a starter that sits 93-95 with an above average breaking ball and a usable changeup."

Good info. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, acslater said:

ProspectsLive had him as the 160th prospect with this to say, "Tavera has been up to 95 with a high spin breaking ball and a model release height. He's a three-pitch arm with starter projection and some velocity gains potentially ahead. Evaluators believe he could be a starter that sits 93-95 with an above average breaking ball and a usable changeup."

Gotta figure this is the O's perspective on him. I bet they love the spin and potential for unlocking velocity. Hope it's true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per Brad Ciolek: sits 92-94, touches 96, has feel for the slider and a plus changeup.    That’s a lot better than the OP suggested.   I’m liking this pick better, especially knowing how reluctant the O’s are to use high picks on pitchers.   They must really like him a lot.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

Per Brad Ciolek: sits 92-94, touches 96, has feel for the slider and a plus changeup.    That’s a lot better than the OP suggested.   I’m liking this pick better, especially knowing how reluctant the O’s are to use high picks on pitchers.   They must really like him a lot.  

I heard his stuff was legit for a 5th rounder so he was not just a 10K guy, Will being interesting to hear what he signed for with no leverage though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I heard his stuff was legit for a 5th rounder so he was not just a 10K guy, Will being interesting to hear what he signed for with no leverage though.

The senior thing isn't just different because a lot of them would have been juniors with value last year. It's different because they can still choose to go back for another year if they want. None of this year's seniors are out of eligibility, are they? So they do have leverage just like history's juniors. That's my understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

The senior thing isn't just different because a lot of them would have been juniors with value last year. It's different because they can still choose to go back for another year if they want. None of this year's seniors are out of eligibility, are they? So they do have leverage just like history's juniors. That's my understanding.

Yeah, but at his age, if he went back, he would lose ever more leverage and sign for even less next year. Might as well and get started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • And McCann is our worst RHB facing a dominant lefty with reverse splits. You have to think a K is a high likelihood.  And then to send him up there with Ramon on 3rd, you have to expect the same outcome.
    • I don't like hearing that a catcher has a back issue -no matter how big or how small it is- at age 26.  
    • IMO he made two decisions that were clearly wrong, pitching to Witt and not PR Holliday, to go along with a couple others I didn’t agree with but are certainly debatable. There is no doubt that the game was lost because the bats couldn’t push a run across, but everyone has a job to do, and like the batters, Hyde didn’t do his.
    • I use the StatCast search function. It’s a little more complicated for chase rate, ground ball rate, popup rate, and sweet spot rate because you need to adjust selected pitch attributes/outcomes as well as total pitch definition and then use % of pitches. I believe popups are categorized by stringers and generally capture balls that an infielder could catch.  I believe Adley’s fly balls have gotten can of cornier even without the popups.
    • ...or simply choose not to even attempt to play situational baseball.  As I posted in another thread, 0-0 game both teams aces are dealing.  Ced leads off the inning with a double.  Your #9 hitter (McCann) is coming to the plate with your two best hitters (Gunnar and Westburg) to follow. Instead of bunting Ced to 3rd and almost assuring yourself a 1-0 lead which firmly puts the pressure on KC, Hyde chooses to let McCann swing away.  He feebly strikes out, Gunnar grounds out (there was your run), and Westburg flies out.  0 runs, 1 hit, 0 errors. 1 left on....
    • Adley - Is it an injury? Is it a woman? Is it the "process?" Is it just who he is at his age? What Is It? And no, I'm not doing a pole. Wait till 2025 for the answer - I think. Till then - speculate. This off season goin be fun on here. This thread kinda makes me miss Rick Dempsey and I have absolutely no idea why. 😄 Oh yea, he was our last WSMVP.
    • Hasn't he had a girlfriend for a long time? And she's just now a distraction?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...