Jump to content

Best Players to Never Make the All Star Game


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Definitely should have been.

Looked it up out of curiosity and in Gibson's 1988 MVP year, he put up a 155 OPS+ in the first half with 15 home runs when that really meant something. Rafael Palmeiro made the all star game that year (as a reserve OF) for the Cubs when he put up a 125 OPS+ with only 6 home runs. 

There were multiple Cubs on the all star team that year, so it's not like a case where Palmeiro made it as the lone representative of his team. Gibson just got straight out snubbed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of those guys were snubs, but Dempsey and his .233 average (and no doubt his low OPS) wasn't a snub.  All Star ballots were a popularity contest back then even more than today.  I remember one year Carew was batting around.200 before the All Star game and still made it over Eddie Murray.  I also liked how often their performance in a World Series was mentioned as if that would get them to the All Star game that year.  Last I checked, All Star game was in the middle of the season and World Series was after the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Some of those guys were snubs, but Dempsey and his .233 average (and no doubt his low OPS) wasn't a snub.  All Star ballots were a popularity contest back then even more than today.  I remember one year Carew was batting around.200 before the All Star game and still made it over Eddie Murray.  I also liked how often their performance in a World Series was mentioned as if that would get them to the All Star game that year.  Last I checked, All Star game was in the middle of the season and World Series was after the season. 

They used to have two all star games. One halfway, one after the season. That stopped awhile ago though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

They used to have two all star games. One halfway, one after the season. That stopped awhile ago though. 

In the several years they had 2 MLB all star games, both were mid-season, about 3 weeks apart.  I don't believe there was ever a post-season MLB all-star game.  The NFL's pro bowl might be the post-season all-star games you are thinking of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly surprised about Hoiles.  In ‘93 he had a 6.8 rWAR, 1.001 OPS season.  At the all star break he had a .984 OPS with 18 HR, 46 RBI.   Our good friend Cito Gaston picked Terry Steinbach as the backup C.   At the break he had a .781 OPS with 9 HR and 34 RBI.  He finished at .749 OPS and 2.5 rWAR.   Pudge Rodriguez was the starting C in his third major league season (2nd straight all star game), with a .720 OPS, 5 HR, 39 RBI at the break, on his way to a .727 OPS, 2.5 rWAR season.   Can’t blame Cito for that, though I’d like to. 

In Cito’s defense, he had to pick someone from Oakland and Steinbach was their sole representative.   The O’s had Ripken and Mussina on the team, though Mussina…well, you know.
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • What about the Rays? I know it’s hard to trade in division. They need offense and you could kill 2 birds with one stone. Zach Efflin and Jason Adam would solve both starter and bullpen issues. Rays may be extra incentivized to get rid of Efflin contract.
    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...