Jump to content

A chance at .400 ?


GuidoSarducci

Recommended Posts

The Orioles currently sit at 37-66 for a winning percentage of .359.

In order to reach .400, the Orioles would have to win 65 games, or 28 games from here on out.   With  59 games remaining, that means the Orioles would have to finish 28-31, or 3 games under .500 the rest of the way.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not happening.   We’ve been playing a rare stretch of games against losing teams (Nats, Marlins, Tigers).  The rest of the way we have 38 games against winning teams, 12 against losing teams, 9 against teams that are basically .500 (ATL, PHI, LAA).   I do think it’s possible we play better than .359 the rest of the way, but I’d be really surprised if we were anywhere close to .500 over the remaining 59 games.   Fangraphs projects .398 the rest of the way for us, which gets us to 60-61 wins.   I think that’s reasonable to hope for.   

That said, there’s always 2010.   32-73 followed by 34-23.    So you never know.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Not happening.   We’ve been playing a rare stretch of games against losing teams (Nats, Marlins, Tigers).  The rest of the way we have 38 games against winning teams, 12 against losing teams, 9 against teams that are basically .500 (ATL, PHI, LAA).   I do think it’s possible we play better than .359 the rest of the way, but I’d be really surprised if we were anywhere close to .500 over the remaining 59 games.   Fangraphs projects .398 the rest of the way for us, which gets us to 60-61 wins.   I think that’s reasonable to hope for.   

That said, there’s always 2010.   32-73 followed by 34-23.    So you never know.  
 

Those teams -- Washington before its trade binge, Miami and Detroit -- were under .500, but they weren't terrible teams. They all have records better than the Orioles', much better in the case of the Nats and Bengals (Do people still call them that?), due in part to their weaker divisional rivals.

I think an optimistic but reasonable inference from this small sample size is that if the Orioles get some decent starting pitching --- a big if -- they're not now among the handful of worst teams in MLB. I have thought for the past couple of weeks that with Means back and pitching well and Harvey turning things around, and without major injuries, this could be a .400 team over the second half, even with the challenging schedule.

If something like that happens, there would be some slippage in the place for the 2022 amateur draft. Too bad about the draft. (I've long thought that the amateur draft order should be modified to reflect not only winning percentage but also strength of schedule. That apparently would be too complicated or too fair for MLB.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Those teams -- Washington before its trade binge, Miami and Detroit -- were under .500, but they weren't terrible teams. They all have records better than the Orioles', much better in the case of the Nats and Bengals (Do people still call them that?), due in part to their weaker divisional rivals.

I think an optimistic but reasonable inference from this small sample size is that if the Orioles get some decent starting pitching --- a big if -- they're not now among the handful of worst teams in MLB. I have thought for the past couple of weeks that with Means back and pitching well and Harvey turning things around, and without major injuries, this could be a .400 team over the second half, even with the challenging schedule.

If something like that happens, there would be some slippage in the place for the 2022 amateur draft. Too bad about the draft. (I've long thought that the amateur draft order should be modified to reflect not only winning percentage but also strength of schedule. That apparently would be too complicated or too fair for MLB.)

Yeah, I am not too worried about our draft position.    I'd rather have the team playing like they are an improving team.   However, it matters to me how they do it.   The resurgence of Harvey is enjoyable, but it doesn't help the team beyond 2021.   Means showing he's healthy and pitching well is much more meaningful.  I'd like to see Hays and Mountcastle finish the year strong and have Mullins just keep doing what he's doing.   If Urias continues hitting and shows he can handle SS, that's a long term plus.   I'm hoping we continue to see good work out of the pen from Sulser, Tate, Fry and T. Wells.   It would be nice if A. Wells and Zimmermann showed they could be reliable back end guys.   Lots of things still to watch in the next two months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, I am not too worried about our draft position.    I'd rather have the team playing like they are an improving team.   However, it matters to me how they do it.   The resurgence of Harvey is enjoyable, but it doesn't help the team beyond 2021.   

We could offer him a QO ….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, maybenxtyr said:

Why? That would probably be 17-18 million. He can be brought back as a free agent if the team is impressed with him down the stretch.

I do not know how that works. Would that amount be for any free agent? He certainly does not merit that kind of money. Not really sure what he would want to come back, or what the Orioles would be willing to offer. Personally, I can see them working something out and bringing him back next year. Maybe Holt is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

I do not know how that works. Would that amount be for any free agent? He certainly does not merit that kind of money. Not really sure what he would want to come back, or what the Orioles would be willing to offer. Personally, I can see them working something out and bringing him back next year. Maybe Holt is 

The QO was 18.9 this season. It is based off of the top 125 mlb contract averages per season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Lol!  Correct, dude! I'm not against anything.  I just feel like maybe the expectations are a little higher than they need to be.  We don't need a number one SP - I mean, it would be great, but the value/cost at this moment would be bad, imo.  So I think there's the chance he's shopping at Ollie's.  Nothing wrong with that to me.  I'm just wondering if there are targets out there that someone is familiar with that would cost little instead of the guys being talked about - top prospects, Kjerstadt, etc. Other than Buddy Groom, LOL, there are no answers.  Fuji was almost equivalent to what I'm talking about here.  I just don't know who as I don't watch games around the league as I know many others here do.
    • Mayo.  His 2024 numbers are incredible, so you’re selling high as far as prospects go.  But his defense is a question mark and as this year shows, he has the least clear path to the majors of the group. Some of that is because of his age relative JH and SB, but it’s clear that JH and SB have clear rolls on this team once they are ready.  Mayo’s path is less clear. 
    • I'm coming around to this idea more and these are all good points, but I still wouldn't give up a whole lot for him.  His season so far this year is giving me a bit of Austin Voth 2022 vibes.  83 IP for us with a 3.04 ERA, 3.96 FIP, 8.3 H/9, 1.1 HR/9, 2.7 BB/9, 7.8 K/9...then he went back to being the Austin Voth he always was.  Maybe it's that they both pitched for the Nationals for a bit at the beginning of their careers, but both careers prior to their "breakout" 2022 and 2024 seasons, respectively, along with their numbers in their "breakout" seasons are eerily similar. I'm not dismissing the idea that he has figured something out, I'm just not willing to risk much betting that he has. 
    • I'm expecting the All-Star game soon. I would have said as quickly as possible after the sale but now I think they will wait until the renovations are complete.
    • I don't like the idea of parting with significant prospects for marginal players. For comparison's sake, we traded for Flaherty last year and gave up basically nothing. Flaherty (even mid season last year) is about as good as some of the guys we are thinking of trading real prospects for. Even if you get an additional year(s) of control, guys like Efflin I'm not trading someone like Norby for. I think we can do better if we are going to jet out the Norbys and Beavers of the world.
    • Maybe we can have an all star game and winter classic in the near future too!
    • I would consider Fedde the main aisle along with relievers like Scott and Estevez.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...