Jump to content

08/18 Roster Moves: RHP Zack Burdi claimed off waivers from the Chicago White Sox and optioned to Norfolk; LHP Ryan Hartman has been designated for assignment


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

I have gotten into the habit of checking MLB trade rumors on a regular basis during the day to see who is the next DFA to check out. I remember Nick Burdi But he’s not the guy I was expecting we would claim. I was thinking Chris Ellis from the Rays.

And I echo the curiosity as to why Valdes was not given the boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Philip said:

I have gotten into the habit of checking MLB trade rumors on a regular basis during the day to see who is the next DFA to check out. I remember Nick Burdi But he’s not the guy I was expecting we would claim. I was thinking Chris Ellis from the Rays.

And I echo the curiosity as to why Valdes was not given the boot.

They needed a space on the 40 man roster.  Valdez is also on the 26.  If they booted him then someone would have to join the 26, and I have no idea who is on the taxi squad right now or even if they brought a taxi squad to Tampa.   Of course I guess they could play a man short in Tampa.

But maybe they just chose the most vulnerable of the guys on the 40 who wasn't with the big club and that was Hartman.

There's a dozen guys on the 40 who will be DFA'd in the next several months.   Worrying about which one goes first is utterly trivial.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, SteveA said:

They needed a space on the 40 man roster.  Valdez is also on the 26.  If they booted him then someone would have to join the 26, and I have no idea who is on the taxi squad right now or even if they brought a taxi squad to Tampa.   Of course I guess they could play a man short in Tampa.

But maybe they just chose the most vulnerable of the guys on the 40 who wasn't with the big club and that was Hartman.

There's a dozen guys on the 40 who will be DFA'd in the next several months.   Worrying about which one goes first is utterly trivial.

I agree that the next guy on the ax blade is pretty irrelevant, given that there are so many pending, and I take your point about the roster, they wouldn’t dump Valdez unless they were planning on adding someone directly to the 26 man.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2021 at 4:27 PM, sportsfan8703 said:

Sisco has been our only player claimed off waivers this year. There’s a really good chance that Greene is back in AAA

Didn’t someone already list 5 or 6 players who were claimed off waivers from the O’s?   Greene was claimed almost two weeks ago.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Didn’t someone already list 5 or 6 players who were claimed off waivers from the O’s?   Greene was claimed almost two weeks ago.   

My friend, who is a Dodger fan, just thanked me for Evan Phillips.  I gave him the LOL ?.  I was still  laughing when I saw that Sisco had an RBI double in his first AB with the Mets.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Didn’t someone already list 5 or 6 players who were claimed off waivers from the O’s?   Greene was claimed almost two weeks ago.   

I could be mistaken. I’ve mainly been following the minors the last two months. Unless I’ve missed a lot, I just don’t see how next season isn’t a tank job too. 
 

I do see the bullpen and lineup coming together. There is some hope. However, we have Means and GrayRod, then everyone else looks like relievers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a minimum, I expect Elias to sign another starter.  I would love a Ray - Stroman type on a multi-year deal.  I'm expecting another one-year Matt Harvey type deal which will be disappointing.  Having Means - Ray - Rodriquez and Zimmerman would at least give us a reasonable ML starting 4.  With a late April, early May promotion of Rutschman, at least we'd have Mullins - Mountcastle - Rutschman and (for now I'll include) Hays in the lineup.  I also could see us signing another Franco type one-year third baseman, although I would like to see us sign a better option on a two to three year deal for third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another thing I should say is that my chart doesn't speak to pitch efficiency or how may pitches teams allow their pitchers to throw.   That data isn't easily collected.   But it could be that O's pitchers don't throw a ton of innings because they walk a lot of guys and reach their pitch count limits sooner than a typical team's pitchers do.
    • On the specific question of whether the O's push their starting pitching prospects' workloads far enough, I had a look at all MiL pitchers in the AL who had thrown at least 90 innings, by team, and broke them into groups of 90-99, 100-109, 110-119, and 120+ innings.   This chart summarizes my findings: Team 120+ 110-119 100-109 90-99 Total 90+ Total 110+ BAL 0 1 4 9 14 1 NYY 4 4 2 6 16 8 BOS 0 3 1 5 9 3 TBR 5 4 4 1 14 9 TOR 1 0 5 2 8 1 CLE 7 3 3 2 15 10 MIN 1 3 3 3 10 4 KCR 3 4 4 7 18 7 DET 0 2 4 7 13 2 CWS 2 3 5 4 14 5 HOU 1 4 6 6 17 5 SEA 4 6 3 4 17 10 TEX 1 1 4 8 14 2 OAK 2 1 2 5 10 3 LAA 4 1 4 4 13 5 AL Ave. 2.33 2.67 3.60 4.87 13.47 5.00 Now, there is some incomplete information here.   It won't pick up a pitcher who had 70 innings with one organization and 20 with another, for example.  It obviously can't tell you which organizations lost pitchers to injuries.  And, it doesn't account for the age and experience of pitchers, which can matter a lot with regard to how much workload a team is comfortable with for a pitcher.    All that said, you can see that the Orioles are at the very bottom of the number of pitchers who have thrown 110+ innings.   They only have one, Alex Pham, who is at 115.   The average team has 5, and two teams have as many as 10.  The O's also are one of only three AL teams that have no pitcher who has thrown 120 innings.  The average team has 2.33, and Cleveland has 7.    I might also add that there are a good number of pitchers on the list who have thrown 130+ innings or more.    On the other hand, the O's have a pretty normal number of pitchers (14) who have thrown at least 90 innings (average was 13.47 and the median was 14).  There are some teams like Boston and Toronto who have a lot fewer than that. All in all, I wouldn't say the Orioles are at the very top of the "baby the pitchers" list, but they are certainly leaning heavily in that direction, based on this data (with the caveats I gave above).
    • Some might call it arrogance, others might call it resolve. I think it's as simple as identifying a problem/situation, analyzing it to the best of your ability and that of the resources at your disposal, reaching a conclusion, and sticking to that decision based on the analysis that brought you to that decision. Beyond that, Elias will learn when and how to adjust as he gains experience in the #1 chair.  Honestly, I don't even have any gripes with him at the moment. We all wanted Holliday up, then he stunk. Then we all wanted Mayo up, then he stunk. So who are we complaining about now? I can't even keep up. Not to derail, but it's the same unfair criticism that Hyde is facing on this board. Manager and GM sure have become thankless responsibilities around here. And I know how you all talk about Harbaugh on the football board, too. I'm not apologist for any of them, but I do admire the fact that they've been able to build a championship-caliber club and maintain it through all of the injury adversity we've faced. This board is quick to point out mistakes, but is terrible at giving credit where credit is due, and having the most wins in the American League as we sit here on September 6 deserves a bunch of credit. 
    • Great example, even if we only kept him for part of the season.  Holzman was one of those guys whose success defined explanation, especially by current standards.  He went 5 - 4 for us with a tidy 2.86 ERA... but he allowed 100 hits in 97 innings and allowed more walks (35) than KOs (25).  
    • Is it really more difficult? Much more?    To this O’s fan, the 1970s were a lot “easier” than the 2000s. 
    • That seems to require that Dominguez would be the better contributor. 
    • I live in California and prices for games in SF and Oakland change day-to-day. That is just normal in 2024, any price is only the price at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...