Jump to content

Connolly article on pitching


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Anyway, Connolly's concerns aren't unwarranted. But like, we sorta already knew the pitching was thin. The fact that it's thin and the farm is rated as high as it is means things are at least trending up. Our pitching prospects have largely disappointed this year so it is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course not, when he was with the Astros they used to draft pitchers.  ?

And yesterday, the argument was that was "they" not "he" so what "they" did was no indication of what "he" would do.

I wouldn't be surprised to see one more draft heavy on college position players but who knows what to expect. I'm really interested to find out if any reasonable investment is made in FA pitching this winter or if the O's are happy to go one more slog year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

Anyway, Connolly's concerns aren't unwarranted. But like, we sorta already knew the pitching was thin. The fact that it's thin and the farm is rated as high as it is means things are at least trending up. Our pitching prospects have largely disappointed this year so it is what it is.

I think we all recognized that we had two top flight guys in G-Rod and Hall and were thinking that a guy or two could step up.  Thin, maybe...but there was room for growth.  

Now it's glaringly obvious that the pitching is thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 7Mo said:

And yesterday, the argument was that was "they" not "he" so what "they" did was no indication of what "he" would do.

I wouldn't be surprised to see one more draft heavy on college position players but who knows what to expect. I'm really interested to find out if any reasonable investment is made in FA pitching this winter or if the O's are happy to go one more slog year.

You saw the emoticon right?

Was a joke.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 7Mo said:

And yesterday, the argument was that was "they" not "he" so what "they" did was no indication of what "he" would do.

I wouldn't be surprised to see one more draft heavy on college position players but who knows what to expect. I'm really interested to find out if any reasonable investment is made in FA pitching this winter or if the O's are happy to go one more slog year.

It's my guess that we'll end up with a FA starter who isn't part of the long term solution, and we'll all be pretty pissed about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

I agree as well. I wouldn't be surprised if our best avenue to get a young plus starter was as a package deal that takes on a bad contract as well. Would you sign with the O's if you were a FA starter? Do we have the surplus offensive parts to acquire a young plus starter? Since both of those are a clear "no", I hope ownership is open to such a trade. Hopefully moreso now that Davis is off the roster (though we're still paying him). But that doesn't mean that such a deal is out there this offseason. I hope Elias will be hunting down those opportunities instead of hoping they come to him. 

I wouldn’t sign with the Os if I were looking for a 1 year deal to re-establish value…thus why I think Noah Syndegaard is a pipe dream.

But for a big contract, multi year thing?  Sure.

Of course, this is another reason Adley should be up here..to build that rep on the Ml level of being a catcher you want to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UMDTerrapins said:

It's my guess that we'll end up with a FA starter who isn't part of the long term solution, and we'll all be pretty pissed about it. 

That's a pretty safe guess.

By sitting out the trade deadline, I'd like to think money will be spent this offseason. If not, this is going to be one very, very slow build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I wouldn’t sign with the Os if I were looking for a 1 year deal to re-establish value…thus why I think Noah Syndegaard is a pipe dream.

But for a big contract, multi year thing?  Sure.

Of course, this is another reason Adley should be up here..to build that rep on the Ml level of being a catcher you want to work with.

Noah might have damaged his market yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But beyond the bad state of pitching right now, the biggest question is why? People in this thread have pointed to Lowther, A. Wells, Akin, Zimmermann, Kremer, Baumann, Smith and others as part of the solution, but most of them are the reason it's been such a terrible year. 

Elias needs to figure this out. He needs those guys who are dominating in AA to be good major leaguers. They don't need to be elite, but we should be able to fill out a solid rotation from, say, #'s 4-7, and have a very competitive bullpen.

It's not like Elias didn't have a plan to accomplish that, it's that his plan went up in flames. An unmitigated disaster. That's the real story and we kind of just have to hope that he can figure out how to make it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elias didn’t draft a pitcher this year until what round? He missed on two first round pitchers in Houston so has come to the conclusion, just pass on top level pitchers in the draft, particularly the first round. Doesn’t sound like decision making based on data, sounds like decision making based on fear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another thing I should say is that my chart doesn't speak to pitch efficiency or how may pitches teams allow their pitchers to throw.   That data isn't easily collected.   But it could be that O's pitchers don't throw a ton of innings because they walk a lot of guys and reach their pitch count limits sooner than a typical team's pitchers do.
    • On the specific question of whether the O's push their starting pitching prospects' workloads far enough, I had a look at all MiL pitchers in the AL who had thrown at least 90 innings, by team, and broke them into groups of 90-99, 100-109, 110-119, and 120+ innings.   This chart summarizes my findings: Team 120+ 110-119 100-109 90-99 Total 90+ Total 110+ BAL 0 1 4 9 14 1 NYY 4 4 2 6 16 8 BOS 0 3 1 5 9 3 TBR 5 4 4 1 14 9 TOR 1 0 5 2 8 1 CLE 7 3 3 2 15 10 MIN 1 3 3 3 10 4 KCR 3 4 4 7 18 7 DET 0 2 4 7 13 2 CWS 2 3 5 4 14 5 HOU 1 4 6 6 17 5 SEA 4 6 3 4 17 10 TEX 1 1 4 8 14 2 OAK 2 1 2 5 10 3 LAA 4 1 4 4 13 5 AL Ave. 2.33 2.67 3.60 4.87 13.47 5.00 Now, there is some incomplete information here.   It won't pick up a pitcher who had 70 innings with one organization and 20 with another, for example.  It obviously can't tell you which organizations lost pitchers to injuries.  And, it doesn't account for the age and experience of pitchers, which can matter a lot with regard to how much workload a team is comfortable with for a pitcher.    All that said, you can see that the Orioles are at the very bottom of the number of pitchers who have thrown 110+ innings.   They only have one, Alex Pham, who is at 115.   The average team has 5, and two teams have as many as 10.  The O's also are one of only three AL teams that have no pitcher who has thrown 120 innings.  The average team has 2.33, and Cleveland has 7.    I might also add that there are a good number of pitchers on the list who have thrown 130+ innings or more.    On the other hand, the O's have a pretty normal number of pitchers (14) who have thrown at least 90 innings (average was 13.47 and the median was 14).  There are some teams like Boston and Toronto who have a lot fewer than that. All in all, I wouldn't say the Orioles are at the very top of the "baby the pitchers" list, but they are certainly leaning heavily in that direction, based on this data (with the caveats I gave above).
    • Some might call it arrogance, others might call it resolve. I think it's as simple as identifying a problem/situation, analyzing it to the best of your ability and that of the resources at your disposal, reaching a conclusion, and sticking to that decision based on the analysis that brought you to that decision. Beyond that, Elias will learn when and how to adjust as he gains experience in the #1 chair.  Honestly, I don't even have any gripes with him at the moment. We all wanted Holliday up, then he stunk. Then we all wanted Mayo up, then he stunk. So who are we complaining about now? I can't even keep up. Not to derail, but it's the same unfair criticism that Hyde is facing on this board. Manager and GM sure have become thankless responsibilities around here. And I know how you all talk about Harbaugh on the football board, too. I'm not apologist for any of them, but I do admire the fact that they've been able to build a championship-caliber club and maintain it through all of the injury adversity we've faced. This board is quick to point out mistakes, but is terrible at giving credit where credit is due, and having the most wins in the American League as we sit here on September 6 deserves a bunch of credit. 
    • Great example, even if we only kept him for part of the season.  Holzman was one of those guys whose success defined explanation, especially by current standards.  He went 5 - 4 for us with a tidy 2.86 ERA... but he allowed 100 hits in 97 innings and allowed more walks (35) than KOs (25).  
    • Is it really more difficult? Much more?    To this O’s fan, the 1970s were a lot “easier” than the 2000s. 
    • That seems to require that Dominguez would be the better contributor. 
    • I live in California and prices for games in SF and Oakland change day-to-day. That is just normal in 2024, any price is only the price at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...