Jump to content

Who is the Orioles 2021 #7 prospect?


Tony-OH

Who is the Orioles 2021 #7 prospect?  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the Orioles 2021 #7 prospect?

    • Mike Baumann - RHP
    • Kyle Bradish - RHP
    • Kyle Stowers - RF
    • Jordan Westburg - SS/3B
    • Terrin Vavra - 2B
      0

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, interloper said:

It might be Westburg, but I don't know how you deny Stowers this selection who absolutely mashed this year and is a similar draft position as Westburg.

Kyle Stowers: 23. .897 OPS across 3 teams. (A+, AA, AAA). Corner Outfield

Jordan Westburg: 22. .868 OPS across 3 teams (A-, A+, AA). SS

I'm not exactly complaining about either of them, but I take Westburg.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, interloper said:

It might be Westburg, but I don't know how you deny Stowers this selection who absolutely mashed this year and is a similar draft position as Westburg.

Westburg raked this year too. .868 vs .897 for Stowers across 3 leagues each. Difference is Westburg plays SS. To me, he’s the easy pick at 7. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, waroriole said:

One guy played and led all minor league players in HR. The other guy hasn’t played since March 2020. At this point, there’s not much of a comparison. 

Still, based on all I've read, I'd bet on Kjerstad having at least as much power as Stowers in the majors.  And while Kjerstad might end up with a similar SO problem, it's more clear that Stowers has that problem.  And where they were picked - fairly or not - is going to affect their ratings.  If I'm starting a team that won't play until 2 years, I pick Kjerstad over Stowers.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with Stowers. His consistent hard loud barrels are impressive. He is a very good defensive corner OF, and he thrived in AAA. It was tough to pick between Stowers and Jordan Westburg, but I know Tony really likes Stowers loud contact.

As for Kjerstad, I choose to be optimistic that he can return completely. If he does, I probably rank him 3rd on this list. I think he has a better hit tool and more raw power than Stowers, but I have to say that Stowers has improved his swing decisions tremendously. He is impressive. If Kjerstad does embrace what the Orioles teach, I can see him in AAA by the end of 2022 with similar numbers to Stowers. As his strength and energy comes back over time, he will be the better player of the two, IMHO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Kyle Stowers: 23. .897 OPS across 3 teams. (A+, AA, AAA). Corner Outfield

Jordan Westburg: 22. .868 OPS across 3 teams (A-, A+, AA). SS

I'm not exactly complaining about either of them, but I take Westburg.

Fair point re: SS vs COF, but give me the guy with 27 dingers. Also, it's not easy to hit in AAA and Stowers did a reasonable job there. 

Either way, they are the next two in the list whichever way you slice it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Kyle Stowers: 23. .897 OPS across 3 teams. (A+, AA, AAA). Corner Outfield

Jordan Westburg: 22. .868 OPS across 3 teams (A-, A+, AA). SS

I'm not exactly complaining about either of them, but I take Westburg.

That’s where I come out too.   I just think his infield profile makes him more valuable, plus his K rate is less of a problem.  But I like both players.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Just Regular said:

In that daydream, I think he would be a credible #2.   

Kjerstad was in Torkelson's ballpark on pedigree, Stowers was in Torkelson's ballpark on performance.   TINSTAAPP, etc.

Different circumstances, but Kjerstad feels a bit to me like Josh Hamilton did once upon a time...he's just off the baseball map until he isn't.   All we really know is Decision Sciences thought Kjerstad was the man, and the results on other hitters from recent drafts have generally been good.   Kjerstad '22 mostly same thing as Mancini '21 - fingers crossed his year will be as successful as Trey's.

That's a mighty big ballpark you got there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's a mighty big ballpark you got there.

Well, I did see Kjerstad described as “the best left handed power hitter in the draft,” with Torkelson filling the slot in the RH power hitter category.    However, I’d have to agree that Tork was way more coveted, and his performance this year has confirmed why.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree that Irvin is not in our "big 3", but if he continues to pitch well, it would be great to have a lefty starter in OPACY for the playoffs.   I don't think we should be heading into the postseason counting on Kimbrel for the 9th inning.  The rest of this roster is good enough to win a championship; they need a top tier closer.  
    • In terms of team needs hard throwing bullpen arm ranks first for me over starting pitcher even with Means injury. It's very possible Elias trades for a couple pitchers at the trade deadline with one of them being a starter. A reliever that can throw upper 90's will go a long way in the second half and playoffs.
    • Right. If Bradfield gets the ball into the gaps it’s almost an automatic double with his speed. 
    • I’m kind of confused with the “coming to earth a bit” idea/notion/words. He has had 2 bad outings ALL SEASON. And all of his numbers are still SUPERIOR in every way to any reliever on our roster.  The talent difference between what he can do and what our best two guys combined can do is very wide! Again, he has had two bad outings. One recently against the Rays and the other about 4/5 appearances ago against the Rockies. He is literally the very best reliever that we could acquire.
    • I’m not really worried about his performance, I’m worried about his injury history And the probability that it would interfere with him and the rest of the season. However, He is coming down to earth a bit; it’s not just his last outing, but his last few outings, I think. Still love to have him, but the price I would be willing to pay has decreased a little bit.
    • Well that explains how we keep ending up with bad relievers off the trash heap.
    • Mateo has an open stance at the plate and also stands back from the plate. Hence, he is very susceptible to the  slider or sweeper off the plate. I was expecting a strike out last night with runners on first and third. In fact, he had two swings and misses at outside breaking pitches during that at bat. But, the pitcher threw one that was in the wrong place and Mateo ripped it. He is doing a good job of staying on those pitches he can handle. And, as stated above, not quite as prone to wave at outside breaking stuff. He is fun to watch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...