Jump to content

The Dylan Bundy Over/Under


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

How satisfied/dissatisfied would you be if the Innings Sponge acquired to open 2022 was from whatever shelf Dylan Bundy is on?

Bundy himself is a young free agent at 28 (will turn 29 in a few days).  It seems like ages ago that entering 2021, he was coming off a very successful 2020 and him vs. Gausman for most successful free agent to be for 2022 was a fair fight.

His year went Trout/Rendon/2021 Angels bad but as far as I can tell the shoulder strain that ended his season after his August 24 game against us has not mushroomed to a bigger injury.   He was not in anyone's Top 50 free agents, where AAV guesses went as low as the 1/8 range.   

As is tradition with him, Home Runs given up made the ERA 6.00 bad, but WHIP in the 1.35 ballpark and 84/34 K/BB in 90 innings.

I think 2022 Bundy would be a clear step up from 2021 Harvey.   His xFIP in the 4.60's from 2021 similar to Taillon, Hendricks, Tyler Anderson, though xFIP perhaps goofily thinks he'll give up home runs at an average rate.    I will be pleasantly surprised if Elias lands a materially better pitcher than him, given the whispers Sports Guy has shared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, I’m a huge Dylan Bundy fan, and I wish him all the success in the world.   

However, we’d need to consider that from May 8 to the end of his season on August 24, Bundy pitched to a 7.41 ERA, whereupon he was shut down with shoulder soreness.   His FIP over that time was 6.72.    Knowing Bundy’s injury history, I can’t see signing him to a major league deal.   Wouid I be interested in a Harvey-like make good MiL deal?   Maybe.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dylan's last four starts were in August after his bullpen exile ended and he pitched to a low 3.31 ERA. Granted it was only 16.33 innings, but the slash line-against was only .183 / .279 / .383 / .663. Perhaps the beginning of a recovery before the injury?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be happy to bring Bundy back, I wonder if a different pitching coach can get more out of him. He’s still young enough that he should still have some good production in him.

I don’t recall what his problem was here, and I don’t recall what his problem was in Anaheim, but he’s too good to be this bad. I just wonder if he would be willing to come back?

Meanwhile, do we have any interest in  Zach Davies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Bundy is not built to pitch in Camden Yard.  Homers galore.

2019- 17 games, 16 HR at home.  13 games, 13 HR on the road.

2018- 17 games, 22 HR at home.  14 games, 19 HR on the road.

2017- 16 games, 15 HR at home.  12 games, 11 HR on the road.

2016- 19 games, 9 HR at home.  17 games, 9 HR on the road.

I'm not seeing how OPACY is a big factor.  What am I missing?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

2019- 17 games, 16 HR at home.  13 games, 13 HR on the road.

2018- 17 games, 22 HR at home.  14 games, 19 HR on the road.

2017- 16 games, 15 HR at home.  12 games, 11 HR on the road.

2016- 19 games, 9 HR at home.  17 games, 9 HR on the road.

I'm not seeing how OPACY is a big factor.  What am I missing?

You are missing that he got worst over the time he was here.  That he gave up 41 homers in 2018 and 29 in 2019.  So what if he gave them up on the road also.  He still gave up a lot at Camden Yards.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

You are missing that he got worst over the time he was here.  That he gave up 41 homers in 2018 and 29 in 2019.  So what if he gave them up on the road also.  He still gave up a lot at Camden Yards.

I have no idea what you are trying to say.  What does his numbers declining have to do with OPACY?  Do you think the stadium contributed to his decline somehow?  How would that even work?

A much better argument to be made would be that given his HR rate he should avoid pitching in the AL East.  That's a reasonable argument.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to agree with C_o_c.   Bundy’s homer-proneness is not a function of pitching in Camden Yards, and he’s no less likely to be successful here as anywhere else.  His career ERA at OPACY is 4.50, compared to 4.72 overall.   At this point, after the season he just had, it’s more a matter of whether he can be successful anywhere.   


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Yeah, I don't think I'm interested on anything more than a minor-league deal

I suppose Bundy falling to no guaranteed contract could happen.   It happened last year to Hamels and Porcello, who were crowd-sourced for $10M+, and ended up with no job to their liking before spring.   My guess is his youth might help him to something in the Galvis 1.5 to Iglesias 3.5 range, if Elias is limited to shopping in that not so rarefied air.

I believe Bundy would have more upside than many of the other pitchers who will sell their 2022 performances that inexpensively.   The way expectations have been set for 2022 in the handling of the best players, it feels a little bit academic how the Galvis guy and his pitching counterpart does.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love for Bundy to come back to us...but from Dylan's perspective, why would he want to sign with us?  I would guess onyl if no other team gives him an offer.

He had a once-in-a-generation arm when he was younger, which is now a shell of itself because all the injuries.  If I were in his shoes, I would probably have some degree of resentment/blame towards the O's for the injuries that ruined his arm.  It's human nature.

Edited by yark14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, yark14 said:

I'd love for Bundy to come back to us...but from Dylan's perspective, why would he want to sign with us?  I would guess onyl if no other team gives him an offer.

He had a once-in-a-generation arm when he was younger, which is now a shell of itself because all the injuries.  If I were in his shoes, I would probably have some degree of resentment/blame towards the O's for the injuries that ruined his arm.  It's human nature.

I think his arm was done when he got to us. Did he ever throw that famed cutter? Even in the minors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, yark14 said:

I'd love for Bundy to come back to us...but from Dylan's perspective, why would he want to sign with us?  I would guess onyl if no other team gives him an offer.

He had a once-in-a-generation arm when he was younger, which is now a shell of itself because all the injuries.  If I were in his shoes, I would probably have some degree of resentment/blame towards the O's for the injuries that ruined his arm.  It's human nature.

 

I'd be more inclined to blame dear old Dad in Dylan's shoes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

I'd be more inclined to blame dear old Dad in Dylan's shoes.

Correct. If anything Bundy's workout regimen that was influenced by his father was most likely the cause of his injury problems. You want a player to have a good work ethic, but you can push it too far and that is likely the case with Bundy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I can agree with you that Holliday moving to center would be a great development for the roster makeup.  I do believe though that he is a Scott Boras client. With so many young players on the 40 man being represented by Boras, I wonder if they would force a move to the outfield for Holliday if he didn't want to make the switch. Sadly, these types of politics probably play a part of decision making by front offices. 
    • I don't really remember Stanhouse because I was eight in 1979. He did pitch in the first MLB I ever saw in person in September of that year.  But he was a recurring topic of discussion on the radio and TV of my youth, with the Full Pack story repeated many times by Chuck and Brooks and Jon Miller and others. Stanhouse certainly had a weird profile for a late-inning reliever, walking more than he struck out and with mediocre K rates. But somehow had ERAs under 3.00 in '78-79 despite much worse FIPs. He only allowed four homers in 146 innings those two years, so I have to think he relied on a sinker and the pitcher-friendliness of Memorial Stadium.
    • This Jack Flaherty?  The one with a lower FIP than any pitcher in our starting rotation? https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/f/flaheja01.shtml
    • Hancock has an injury history, mediocre stats, a blue page at baseball Savant, and wasn’t considered superior to Mike Baumann. Given their need for relief pitching, it is telling that they don’t have him on the big club. Woo is injured(though it’s a leg injury)but he’s only thrown 8starts/40 innings, about half what you’d expect from a starter so far. His trade value is diminished, so he’s probably more valuable to keep. When he comes back, the Mariners will need him in the pen, where another injury will have less impact. I’d love to get him, but the Ms keep him. Bryce Miller isn’t going anywhere. He's not a FA til 2030, plus, He’s starting tonight. Seattle isn’t going to deal from their rotation, especially someone as young as Miller. They may trade him, but only for an overpay, which ME won’t do.
    • With Bradish’s injury, and the assumption Burnes will leave,  I keep seeing posters saying our rotation next year being Rodriguez, Kremer, Povich, Irvin, Suarez. Maybe McDermott comes up this year and can be a force in the rotation but it goes without saying Elias would not proceed with a rotation that thin. Theres been a lot of chatter about acquiring a pitcher at the deadline with control next year and maybe beyond. To me that is far from a certainty considering Elias’ history of being conservative in trades, and priding himself in the minor league depth. My preference would be to acquire someone like Scherzer if he’s available for the stretch run, and reassess the starting rotation in the offseason, either by trade or by free agency  With that said looking at Spotrac these are the starters I’d be most intrigued by, with those in bold top of the list: Corbin Burnes Walker Buehler Max Fried Max Scherzer Robbie Ray Luis Severino Jack Flaherty  Shane Bieber Nathan Eovaldi Frankie Montas  Yusel Kikuchi          
    • I do agree on Cal Quantrill being a good pickup for the Orioles, but that would require the Rockies to be forward thinking and realizing they need to trade some of their veterans for prospects.
    • I guess so. But strikeouts are like home runs - exceptionally dependent on era. Dazzy Vance twice led the NL in strikeouts as a starter with totals under 150. And strikeouts by a reliver isn't exactly a milestone benchmark - I had to look it up to know what the records are. Did you know the single-season record is by Dick Radatz, with 183? I didn't until 30 seconds ago. Hoyt Wilhelm holds the current record, and Kimbrel trails by 135. You are correct, I missed his 77 inning season with the Braves. Kimbrel is currently 103rd in career relief innings pitched. Between Tom Henke and Hector Carrasco.  As with most HOF arguments, I think my biggest beef is that they let a bunch of marginal guys in when trying to figure stuff out, and now the argument is "Well, if Bruce Sutter is in with just 12 years and 300 saves, then Kimbrel and Chapman and Franco and Hoffman and Smith and Lyle and Garber and Fingers and Francisco Rodriguez and Wagner and Mesa and Myers and on and on...." When if you really want to draw a clear dividing line it's Rivera and then everyone else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...