Jump to content

Correa (Update, signs with Twins)


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, waroriole said:

My guess is the O’s did make a significant offer to Correa but he has no interest in signing because of how the team has been run the last few years. He’s probably desperately seeking a comparable offer so he doesn’t feel forced to go to Baltimore by MLBPA. 

Bunch of scuttlebutt, but I'll continue playing along...

If I'm the O's, and IF the O's put in a larger offer, and IF Correa signs for less to play in Houston, then I would share that publicly after the fact.  Sure it's a little black-eye for the team, but it's not like we don't have that already.  But it clearly shows Correa's desire to compete is aligned with fans interest.  And not the main issues that MLBPA or owners in the recent CBA...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't doubt that Elias wants him.   Or that Angelos would approve the offer.    I doubt the offer because no one credible is reporting it.   Not even Heyman who would probably know if Boras wanted to leak it.

This is a very weak reason for not thinking its credible.

 

The idea that you believe Angelos would offer it but its not real because Heyman isn't reporting it is kind of funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, waroriole said:

My guess is the O’s did make a significant offer to Correa but he has no interest in signing because of how the team has been run the last few years. He’s probably desperately seeking a comparable offer so he doesn’t feel forced to go to Baltimore by MLBPA. 

$300 million probably won't sign Correa, and I don't think it is the best use for the O's if they can only afford one mega contract.  I would rather use the money to extend Mullins, Adley, or G Rod, and put the rest in the "war chest".  With the funds from not signing Tex, Vlad (1st contract), etc it should be a huge war chest for when the O's are ready to contend and need to add pieces. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabba72 said:

I really dont want Correa for 10 years, because he wont be a good SS at 37.  8 is the highest I would go. Even that number im expecting  a few below average or worse years. 

I have said 8/280 with 180M in the first 4 years and an opt out after that. (I would put in an opt clause for every year after the 4th year).

Thats a big offer.  May not get him but that would be my preference over 10/300.  

That said, I do not think we get him without going longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

$300 million probably won't sign Correa, and I don't think it is the best use for the O's if they can only afford one mega contract.  I would rather use the money to extend Mullins, Adley, or G Rod, and put the rest in the "war chest".  With the funds from not signing Tex, Vlad (1st contract), etc it should be a huge war chest for when the O's are ready to contend and need to add pieces. 

They easily can do all of this and even if you extend GRod or Adley tomorrow, they won't start making "real money" for 5 more years.

Even that first year of arbitration will only be 4-5M.

The idea of extending Mullins shouldn't even be a consideration right now and you have him for a while longer anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I definitely consider Correa elite.  The main reservation I have with him is durability.   

His durability concerns me as well, especially since so much of his value is tied to his defense and that tends to start slipping once you get into your 30s even if you're not banged up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

To be clear, Ben Verlander didn’t confirm anything.  He just quoted Ryan’s article and said it appears Correa has been offered this deal by the Os.

Very different than him confirming it.

His article said he confirmed it with multiple sources. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I have said 8/280 with 180M in the first 4 years and an opt out after that. (I would put in an opt clause for every year after the 4th year).

Thats a big offer.  May not get him but that would be my preference over 10/300.  

That said, I do not think we get him without going longer.

Its just not realistic to expect a SS to be useful after age 35 in todays game. Im hoping this rumor is false. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I have said 8/280 with 180M in the first 4 years and an opt out after that. (I would put in an opt clause for every year after the 4th year).

Thats a big offer.  May not get him but that would be my preference over 10/300.  

That said, I do not think we get him without going longer.

I don’t like this. You’re basically signing him for 4/180, unless he sucks or gets hurt. We’re unlikely to be a contender for at least 1 of those years. Then you’re giving him another 4/100 to be a drain on the payroll. 
 

Either way, you’re probably right that it doesn’t matter because we’ll need the best offer by far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

Its just not realistic to expect a SS to be useful after age 35 in todays game. Im hoping this rumor is false. 

But he could be a useful third baseman.  The back end of the contract will probably suck but if you win a title in the meantime, who cares.

He will also be surrounded by cheap guys who could be elite, so that makes it even easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I was wondering that too.  

The longer this goes on, I think the further he gets away from Houston but it allows for some mystery team out of nowhere to swoop in and sign him.  

The more it drags on I think th likelyhood he ends up back in HOU increases.  The Astros don't seem like they were anxious to get rid of him and I don't get the impression he was unhappy there.

If Boras is unsuccessful getting anyone to bite on the type of deal he wants I think Houston is the most likely fallback on a shorter term deal. It would allow Boras to try again in a year or two for the massive deal.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • DC is a FA. Soto and Dominguez are interesting decisions. SA is do 8M next year. Soto is under team control and likely looking at a salary in the 6.5M range.   In some ways, they sound like overpays for each. OTOH, they miss bats, can be high leverage guys and you don’t have long term commitments with either. As of now, I lean towards keeping both. I would like to re-sign DC depending on the contract. But I would still like to add another power arm. Now, that power arm could be an unproven close to ML ready prospect you get for Mullins or Mounty or OHearn. It doesn’t have to be someone you sign to a major deal. There may also be some ML relievers available for trade that makes sense. We see these teams all the time that just seemingly have power arm after power arm and we don’t have that. Elias has failed to address the pen properly imo and really, we don’t know if Felix will be the 2023 Felix going forward.  The pen has to be seen as a priority this year.    I want to see resources poured into the pitching staff and the improvement of the defense. 
    • Danny's back. I guess youre moving on from SA and Soto?
    • So what would you offer?, For me Max 2 years with mutual option. IF its any more than that keeping him might be tough.
    • The pen needs more help than just Bautista. So let’s say Santander is gone and the offense misses him…but what if the defense and pitching get better? People seem to have this narrow view of the sport that you can only win one way or with certain players. 
    • What's up peeps???  Lord I needed that win yesterday!!  Then the hubs and I (and about 200 other folks LOL) met Taters at a local restaurant establishment meet and greet last night.  And that was INSANE (in a good way).
    • Oddly, it’s the offense that I’m worried about for next year. Theoretically, we should go back to having a dominant pen with Bautista back. That helps shorten the game from the back of the pen down.  We’ve shown the ability under this regime to be able to piece together a rotation.  Subtracting Santa from this offense will be tough. 
    • Yep and by saying himself, I’d say his defense has been a major disappointment
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...