Jump to content

Fangraphs on managing prospect expectations


Frobby

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

And/or too tall to set a good low target.

He had a couple really nice years on defense but his defensive peak didn't last long.

I always thought it was because Buck ran him into the ground, but could be that the knees and height were never going to allow for his longevity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

And/or too tall to set a good low target.

He had a couple really nice years on defense but his defensive peak didn't last long.

I don’t know when framing stats started to be published, but I think it was after Wieters had graduated to the majors.   That was his main weakness.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I don’t know when framing stats started to be published, but I think it was after Wieters had graduated to the majors.   That was his main weakness.   

Mike Fast had him a bit about neutral.  The others that followed after were less enthusiastic.

Now is that because of the methodology used or did his ability to frame decline over time? 

Probably a bit of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will keep my expectation for Adley and Grayson high.  

Cowser my be a corner OF with a high OBP and 15 HR power

Mayo may not be a 3B. But I think he will hit.

I think most would understand with DL Hall goes through TJ at some point and could be a reliever.

Kjerstad may have power but not a high average and is only an average RF.  Same with Stowers.

Gunnar maybe a 3B but I think he can have an 850 OPS.

Westburg could be a 2B with an 800 OPS.

I will be surprised if Mountcastle and Mullins  don't maintain an 850 OPS.

So across all the top 10 O's prospects some may not be all stars but as a whole  I think they will fair pretty well and the combination of all of them will bring a good offensive team.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I really don’t recall criticism, it’s just that defense wasn’t his big selling point.   His hitting was.   He definitely exceeded expectations defensively and fell short of them offensively.   

It was almost obligatory, because all prospect writeups have a weakness or needs to improve category, and for Wieters it was ALWAYS his defense.  And as others have recalled, it was mainly about his size preventing him from setting a good target and/or preventing him from having a good pop time to second. Also, about how his size would prevent him from having a long career behind the dish and would necessitate a move to first.

Feel free to jog my memory, but nobody predicted him to become a Gold Glove catcher, with an arm as a real asset.  Likewise nobody made a criticism of his bat, including what would turn out to be legitimate criticisms: That he lacked elite bat speed, and that was a significantly better hitter from the right side than the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/5/2022 at 11:53 AM, wildcard said:

I will keep my expectation for Adley and Grayson high.  

Cowser my be a corner OF with a high OBP and 15 HR power

Mayo may not be a 3B. But I think he will hit.

I think most would understand with DL Hall goes through TJ at some point and could be a reliever.

Kjerstad may have power but not a high average and is only an average RF.  Same with Stowers.

Gunnar maybe a 3B but I think he can have an 850 OPS.

Westburg could be a 2B with an 800 OPS.

I will be surprised if Mountcastle and Mullins  don't maintain an 850 OPS.

So across all the top 10 O's prospects some may not be all stars but as a whole  I think they will fair pretty well and the combination of all of them will bring a good offensive team.

 

 

 

Glad to see you are managing expectations!

You would be surprised if Mullins and Mountcastle aren’t amongst the 35 or so best offensive players?  That would SURPRISE you?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sevastras said:

If he isnt Buster Posey, I will be disappointed.  I actually think he comps very well with Posey, who had a career BA of .302.

He didn't hit .300 in the MiLs.

What makes you think he'll do it for his ML career?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adley is very likely to be a good major leaguer because he's a position player.

Rodriguez is not because he's a pitcher. 

At least, that's how my brain works. If ANY pitcher we develop becomes a quality major leaguer, I always feel like we won the lottery. Even with a sure thing like G-Rod. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal mental model for prospect expectations is to approach it like a portfolio of VC investments. That is, think about them in terms of what their realistic strong positive outcome is (~75th-90th+ percentile outcome, stop short of long right-hand tail outcomes along distribution) and recognize that many will flame out or only achieve a fraction of that potential. Personally find that to be a better reflection of dynamic at play vs. penciling them all in at their 50th percentile outcome or slightly more conservative.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Maybe i moved to early on DC, but Bref  shows his contact status with a 2025 team option. SA and Soto are both overpays, but potentially really good options in a reduced role, another power arm would require them to move on from one of SA or Soto, unless youre looking to upgrade Akin or Bowman. Perez will be back.
    • DC is a FA. Soto and Dominguez are interesting decisions. SA is do 8M next year. Soto is under team control and likely looking at a salary in the 6.5M range.   In some ways, they sound like overpays for each. OTOH, they miss bats, can be high leverage guys and you don’t have long term commitments with either. As of now, I lean towards keeping both. I would like to re-sign DC depending on the contract. But I would still like to add another power arm. Now, that power arm could be an unproven close to ML ready prospect you get for Mullins or Mounty or OHearn. It doesn’t have to be someone you sign to a major deal. There may also be some ML relievers available for trade that makes sense. We see these teams all the time that just seemingly have power arm after power arm and we don’t have that. Elias has failed to address the pen properly imo and really, we don’t know if Felix will be the 2023 Felix going forward.  The pen has to be seen as a priority this year.    I want to see resources poured into the pitching staff and the improvement of the defense. 
    • Danny's back. I guess youre moving on from SA and Soto?
    • So what would you offer?, For me Max 2 years with mutual option. IF its any more than that keeping him might be tough.
    • The pen needs more help than just Bautista. So let’s say Santander is gone and the offense misses him…but what if the defense and pitching get better? People seem to have this narrow view of the sport that you can only win one way or with certain players. 
    • What's up peeps???  Lord I needed that win yesterday!!  Then the hubs and I (and about 200 other folks LOL) met Taters at a local restaurant establishment meet and greet last night.  And that was INSANE (in a good way).
    • Oddly, it’s the offense that I’m worried about for next year. Theoretically, we should go back to having a dominant pen with Bautista back. That helps shorten the game from the back of the pen down.  We’ve shown the ability under this regime to be able to piece together a rotation.  Subtracting Santa from this offense will be tough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...