Jump to content

How Long Will Elias Stay in Baltimore?


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

My biggest concern is the mess of an ownership situation and if it doesn't get resolved might prompt Elias to look for greener (less dysfunctional) pastures. 

I think the main unknown is whether the next owner of the team wants to bring in a new GM (or creates an environment that Elias doesn't want to work in).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

I think the main unknown is whether the next owner of the team wants to bring in a new GM (or creates an environment that Elias doesn't want to work in).

Well the real unknown is when we'll have another owner at all. If that happens, all bets are off. But what if we're 3-4 years away from that? Will they resign Elias?

I'm sure he wants to see this through to a championship, but I'm also sure he likes a lot of zeroes after the other numbers in his pay check.

I swear. If I were the Angels, Nats (post ownership change) and probably a few other big market teams, I'd be throwing the kitchen sink at him trying to let him take over my franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

Well the real unknown is when we'll have another owner at all. If that happens, all bets are off. But what if we're 3-4 years away from that? Will they resign Elias?

I'm sure he wants to see this through to a championship, but I'm also sure he likes a lot of zeroes after the other numbers in his pay check.

I swear. If I were the Angels, Nats (post ownership change) and probably a few other big market teams, I'd be throwing the kitchen sink at him trying to let him take over my franchise.

His proven strength is taking a franchise that's crashed and burned and building a huge talent base while de-prioritizing MLB wins for a number of years.  How many big market teams want to do that, or are willing to do that? If I'm the Nats or the Angels I have no interest in a $40 million payroll and 54 wins a year until 2027. They'd be throwing money at him to do something quite different than he's done with the Astros and Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

His proven strength is taking a franchise that's crashed and burned and building a huge talent base while de-prioritizing MLB wins for a number of years.  How many big market teams want to do that, or are willing to do that? If I'm the Nats or the Angels I have no interest in a $40 million payroll and 54 wins a year until 2027. They'd be throwing money at him to do something quite different than he's done with the Astros and Orioles.

That's a really shallow view of what he's done.

The whole org has coordinated drafting/talent acquisition and player development. The major league team has pitchers over performing. There's depth throughout and it's not just his #1 picks.

Why would an owner not assume he can do all of that while signing guys to big FA contracts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

His proven strength is taking a franchise that's crashed and burned and building a huge talent base while de-prioritizing MLB wins for a number of years.  How many big market teams want to do that, or are willing to do that? If I'm the Nats or the Angels I have no interest in a $40 million payroll and 54 wins a year until 2027. They'd be throwing money at him to do something quite different than he's done with the Astros and Orioles.

Tigers would be more likely.. Ilitch can throw the zeroes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

That's a really shallow view of what he's done.

The whole org has coordinated drafting/talent acquisition and player development. The major league team has pitchers over performing. There's depth throughout and it's not just his #1 picks.

Why would an owner not assume he can do all of that while signing guys to big FA contracts?

You're probably right. But his track record is rescuing franchises by tearing it down to the studs and building internally.  Many organizations don't want to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I imagine the goal is to get him available to just give them anything out of the pen in the wild card round. Depending on how that goes and if the O’s can advance who knows. 
    • The interesting thing about 1B is Mayo.     Elias keeps pushing Mayo at 3B.   But if Westburg is healthy he is better at 3B.   And they don't seem to play Mayo has much as they could at 1B where he might have a better chance at a regular job.    DH might be his best position. If Santander leaves, then Kjerstad probably gets an every day spot at RF.   Elias might want to see Kjerstad hit well in RF before he hands over 2B to Holliday.   Too many struggling rookies at the same time is not good for wins.   Mayo is  behind Kjerstad and Holliday IMO in getting a lot of playing time. However, developing Kjerstad, Holliday and Mayo  are key parts of the O's future no  matter how Elias develops them.
    • Walker is definitely an upgrade over Mountcastle.  Walker has cleared an .800 OPS the past three seasons.  Mountcastle has only done it once -- his rookie year.  Plus Mountcastle hasn't even cleared 20 homers since 2022.  Mountcastle is good in a platoon, used against lefties, but otherwise he's fallen off. Walker is 33, which is a bit of a risk, but which makes me think he could be had on a short term deal.  That said I think the O's will have competition for Walker.  He's one of the most underrated bats in the league.   If the O's think Kjerstad can play 1B then I think they should maybe go with him and look for a new RF (unless they bring back Santander, which seems more unlikely now).  But I don't know about Kjerstad's glove there. Mayo's glove at 1B may be even more questionable than Kjerstad's.  Plus Mayo just hasn't shown he's ready with his bat yet.  I'm against assuming guys will figure out how to hit MLB pitching within a presumed timeframe.  Mayo hasn't shown he's there yet.  Let him work his way into the lineup rather than giving him a starting job.  But with him there's also the issue of where his defense plays best, or if it plays anywhere.
    • So either Grayson won’t face hitters this year (ie he’s done for the year) or he’s in the pen.
    • I feel better after getting a W against the Giants; somewhere along the way I had stated I felt we almost had to get at least one from them, and now we have.  However, lets not act like this one win means the offense has broken its slump and we're suddenly going to start rolling.  I hope we do, but we're one bad game away from feeling like we'll never score a run again.  If we go down 3-0 or something early tonight, it will be hard to resist the doomsday feeling - we're just as likely to get one-hit or something stupid like that tonight as we are to score 5 or 6 runs.  Its a tough schedule to finish the season, tougher than maybe we would have thought with Detroit playing so well.  Still not counting my chickens but yeah that W yesterday changed the calculus a good bit in our favor.
    • Update: As expected, the corresponding move for Coulombe is Burch Smith, but he's going on the IL instead of being DFA'd. Right adductor/groin strain.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...