Jump to content

DL Hall 2022


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I don’t disagree with your assessment that Hall is more talented than Bedard, but I think you’re underselling the matter’s talent a bit.  First of all, his plus-plus pitch was a curve, not a slider.   But his fastball also was plus, and he mixed in a cutter that wasn’t overwhelming but kept hitters off balance and kept them from timing his fastball, which was 4-5 mph higher than the cutter.   

Bedard had trouble staying healthy, but his 2007 season was easily the best I’ve seen from an Orioles pitcher since Mussina in his prime.   Good thing Andy had the good sense to cash in.  

It's been a few years, but Bedard's pitch was certainly a sweeping breaking ball. Without statcast data it could be up to interpretation as to whether it was a curve or slider, but I remember slider movement.

His fastball was mostly 91-94, which I guess for a lefty you can call plus. 

Again, i wasn't taking swipes at Bedard who was very good before the injuries derailed his career,  was more talking about how could Hall's stuff is. Bedard had better command though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well we know Wells isn’t too long for the rotation.  
 

My guess is that the rotation by August has Harvey and ZImmerman in it.   You also have to see how Bradish responds to his shoulder issue and how many innings/what role they want Hall in. 

If the Orioles stick to their babying innings count for him this year, you're right about Wells probably either getting shut down or moved to a reliever by the end of the year. They are going to need those two along with probably Harvey and the new guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well we know Wells isn’t too long for the rotation.  
 

My guess is that the rotation by August has Harvey and ZImmerman in it.   You also have to see how Bradish responds to his shoulder issue and how many innings/what role they want Hall in. 

Judging by the rep on this post, you might have struck a nerve with a relative. I've been there. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

His fastball was mostly 91-94

Wow, I remembered it higher but you're right, 92.6 and 91.6 in 2006 and 2007. Velocities have gone up across the board, I suppose, since then, but still, I remembered him having a better fastball. I guess the fact it had good movement was a big part of it. 

I tend to agree with @Frobby, Bedard in 2007 was something to watch, ERA+ of 146. I'll be very pleased if DL Hall reaches his level but I can see the argument for DL being more talented, I guess, now that I check my memory against the stats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Flash- bd said:

Wow, I remembered it higher but you're right, 92.6 and 91.6 in 2006 and 2007. Velocities have gone up across the board, I suppose, since then, but still, I remembered him having a better fastball. I guess the fact it had good movement was a big part of it. 

I tend to agree with @Frobby, Bedard in 2007 was something to watch, ERA+ of 146. I'll be very pleased if DL Hall reaches his level but I can see the argument for DL being more talented, I guess, now that I check my memory against the stats. 

I never said Hall will be better than Bedard for sure, I just said he has better stuff. The command for Hall will determine his long term role in the big leagues. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

If the Orioles stick to their babying innings count for him this year, you're right about Wells probably either getting shut down or moved to a reliever by the end of the year. They are going to need those two along with probably Harvey and the new guy.

 

Right.  Despite getting down voted by the guy who has a poster of Tyler Wells on his ceiling, I think its obvious that he won't be in the rotation for the whole year.  When Hyde said he won't come close to 150 innings, I think that means the writing is on the wall.  I almost wonder if they send him down around the AS break.  

His last start before the AS break is the 15th.  You won't need a 5th starter until July 26.  Could be a way to save some innings.  Maybe you don't even have him start on the 15th.  Maybe you send him down after his next start and just have him throw a few innings to stay sharp?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Judging by the rep on this post, you might have struck a nerve with a relative. I've been there. :)

He has down voted me several times about Wells.  I think he wants to date him or something.  (not that there is anything wrong with that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Flash- bd said:

Wow, I remembered it higher but you're right, 92.6 and 91.6 in 2006 and 2007. 

I saw those numbers and they are very inconsistent with my recollection.  I think of Bedard as a guy who could sit 94-95 and dial it up to 96-97 on occasion.  The cutter was 90-91.   

Per Fangraphs, at 91.6 Bedard was 27th among 80 qualified starters in FB velocity.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Hazmat said:

I can’t link to it but Zachary Silver, a mlb.com reporter, mentioned in a tweet that Hall was concerned he was tipping his pitches.  Since he raised that concern 2 starts ago, Hall has K’d 22 of the 38 batters he’s faced.

That is like Nintendo with all the cheat codes.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I saw those numbers and they are very inconsistent with my recollection.  I think of Bedard as a guy who could sit 94-95 and dial it up to 96-97 on occasion.  The cutter was 90-91.   

Per Fangraphs, at 91.6 Bedard was 27th among 80 qualified starters in FB velocity.   
 

Totally agreed, Frobby, that was my recollection as well. I remembered Bedard mostly sitting 93-96 in that period. Perhaps fangraphs included his cutter in that data? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

I think its obvious that he won't be in the rotation for the whole year...  I almost wonder if they send him down around the AS break.  

This would rub me, and certainly Wells, the wrong way big time.

I'd rather they move him to closer than send him down. He has been awesome and in no way deserves to be in the minors. 

They do have to manage innings though. I think that's clear. I just think they have to figure out how to do that in the majors. Part of the goal, I think, is to have him pitching for the full season without over doing it on innings. That's tough at the ML level, but I think that's where it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

This would rub me, and certainly Wells, the wrong way big time.

I'd rather they move him to closer than send him down. He has been awesome and in no way deserves to be in the minors. 

They do have to manage innings though. I think that's clear. I just think they have to figure out how to do that in the majors. Part of the goal, I think, is to have him pitching for the full season without over doing it on innings. That's tough at the ML level, but I think that's where it happens.

All you are doing by sending him down is preserving his arm but using his roster space for something else.

Now, I will say this..I wouldn’t do it if it screws up with his service time status.  If it takes away a year of free agency, I think that would be wrong.

But if it doesn’t, I think it’s an idea with merit to get another arm up here and give him essentially a few weeks off.

I think the Os did something like this with Wei Yen Chen years back.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They aren't going to send Wells down.

For one thing it would almost certainly result in a grievance being filed by the union if he was down long enough to not get credit for a full season. He is the most successful starter on the team!

I don't know what his innings limit is, but Wells and Hall could both benefit from being in a 6-man rotation, and it isn't like it would harm any of the other pitchers, especially if Lyles is traded at the deadline.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per CBA rules, hasn’t most (90%) of the deferred buyouts have to be already set aside in present value?  This is why not shown in the payments itemization.  Same with Bobby Bonilla for NYM and why Shohei Ohtani shown in terms of AAV present value. 
    • Are we at the point that we want to give the backup catcher 225-250 PAs? If that's the case, I'd like to see an upgrade from McCann.
    • 1.5 months of data shouldn't make any difference. These guys have too much upside to trade. I'm most concerned about Mayo, more due to lack of position than the early hitting results. Still, no regrets even if Skubal was available, which I highly doubt 
    • I'm not in the group that expected us to miss the playoffs a few days ago.  This thread was a bit silly at the time, and has now become completely irrelevant.  But stating we are going to win 5 of the next 9 games as a fact, is just as ignorant as the people who think we are going to lose out or continue the tailspin to the point that we will miss the playoffs.  As much as I can't stand constant negativity, I also can't stand people who have no tolerance for any negativity, or pessimism, or whatever you want to call it.  If you just want to be a part of a cheerleading group and resent any criticism of the team, a hardcore fan message board is probably not the place for you.  Not just speaking to this poster, but as a retort to similar opinions in general. 
    • Would the team be any better off with Skubal than they are now, considering the hitting woes?  I think that’s debatable, and questionable enough that I wouldn’t give up that high level talent to find out.    Who knows if the Tigers would have even done that?  They’ve made a nice run behind Skubal and the rest of their staff since the deadline. I think it’s a good chance they extend him to lead that young team into the next several years of what they hope are contending teams. Decent position player pool there. 
    • The Tigers are a fun story, reminiscent of the ‘22 birds a little bit (if that team had had a CY winner heading the rotation). But we need to end the dream for them this weekend. Take care of business versus Detroit and next weeks games will hardly matter. We can get our staff set up for the WC series after their next turn. That would be ideal. 
    • This is my thinking as well.  Who would have guessed that despite all the injuries, the Trevor Rogers fiasco and Corbin Burnes' terrible August that the most reliable part of this team would still be the starting pitching?  Eflin and Suarez have anchored a much better than expected rotation, with Kremer and Povich hanging in there despite some rough starts.  The current rotation has mostly kept us in games despite the absence of hitting and a head shaking bullpen.  Would we be better right now with Skubal?  Probably, but not by much with so much else wrong with this team.  Plus we kept our position player future that is clearly mostly still developing.   Perhaps we could still trade for Skubal this offseason, but with the Tigers suddenly Wild Card contenders I can't see them letting him go.  Maybe they'd trade him for a crazy package crazy like Adley, Holliday, Kjerstad and Povich.  I think that ship has sailed and maybe was never close to being a reality anyway.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...