Jump to content

Adley is in the Show!


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

I am definitely not saying to send him down but honest question: what would it take to get a demotion to Norfolk?

Publicly disclosing whatever it is that Owings has on some Orioles executive. (Did you expect an honest answer?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2022 at 3:11 PM, amdcpus said:

Sorry but I've never been impressed by this guy. 24.5 and stinking it up so far. 38 year old kurt suzuki is even hitting 640 OPS as Angels catcher

 

46 minutes ago, amdcpus said:

This guy is terrible I'm sorry to say. His numbers in the minors were not impressive whatsoever either. Looking more and more like a bust. 24.5 years old and looks like a AAA player at best

You sound sorry and unimpressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched some of his at bats but not all of them, and I am in no way a scout, so I have the following questions:  (1) is Adley hitting into bad luck (making good contact but unlucky with where the ball is going)?  (2) Are pitchers making better pitches to Adley than they are to other Orioles' hitters, or is Adley failing to take advantage of hittable pitches coming his way?  

A scout or very knowledgeable fan who has watched his at bats might be able to answer these questions.  I suspect that the right data analytics could also answer these questions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m noticing that Adley’s hitting a lot of balls off the lower end of the bat.  His stance is kind of interesting.   He doesn’t have his hands all the way back.  I feel like his timing is just a little off but once he gets rolling he’ll be fine.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m noticing that Adley’s hitting a lot of balls off the lower end of the bat.  His stance is kind of interesting.   He doesn’t have his hands all the way back.  I feel like his timing is just a little off but once he gets rolling he’ll be fine.  

Here it is again that new OH term developed for Adley: "he'll be fine"

I'll ask again is "fine" what you would expect from a 1-1?

I still hope/expect that he will be a competent ML catcher, but he is definitely not what  I  wanted at 1-1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Here it is again that new OH term developed for Adley: "he'll be fine"

I'll ask again is "fine" what you would expect from a 1-1?

I still hope/expect that he will be a competent ML catcher, but he is definitely not what  I  wanted at 1-1

 

I can pretty easily draw a line: appreciably better than Matt Wieters.  Matt was a competent, somewhat above average major league catcher.   If Rutschman isn’t more than that, I’ll consider him disappointing.  Am I supposed to judge whether he’ll become that based on 2.5 weeks?    That’s preposterous.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I can pretty easily draw a line: appreciably better than Matt Wieters.  Matt was a competent, somewhat above average major league catcher.   If Rutschman isn’t more than that, I’ll consider him disappointing.  Am I supposed to judge whether he’ll become that based on 2.5 weeks?    That’s preposterous.  

I am waiting for next Thursday at 10 PM. See if he is a bust or not. So far of the top prospects only Rodriguez has been good. Witt has shown flashes but slumping again. Torkelson has not been good .TIme will tell which player becomes any good or a few turn into nothing. Much too soon for all of them. The rest are a few years younger then Adley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I can pretty easily draw a line: appreciably better than Matt Wieters.  Matt was a competent, somewhat above average major league catcher.   If Rutschman isn’t more than that, I’ll consider him disappointing.  Am I supposed to judge whether he’ll become that based on 2.5 weeks?    That’s preposterous.  

Nope I didn't say anything about a time scale

Just wondering what fine is, and I appreciate the better than Matt Wieters definition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Nope I didn't say anything about a time scale

Just wondering what fine is, and I appreciate the better than Matt Wieters definition.

 

Objectively, I could argue that “good as Matt Wieters” should be good enough.  Only 24 1-1 picks have exceeded Wieters’ 18.3 rWAR, so that’s about the median outcome for a 1-1.   Emotionally, I can’t make that argument.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I do remember seeing that Basallo went #1 overall in the winter league draft last year. So that will probably be where he ends up. Heck, that’s probably better competition. 
    • I don't think it's as lop-sided as you seem to.   Pre-roid it's close to a bump.  30/30 to 40/40 range in those years for Bonds.   Sure Ohtani could be using similar types of supplements result wise but the focused workouts would look different for Ohtani if he's not pitching. 
    • If you can get him on a 3-4 year deal at $20m or less, it's interesting. But here's the rub w/ Santander: yeah, he's a SH. That's great. And he generally has even splits. But he's not great defensively. He reminds me of a SH Nelson Cruz but without the batting average or OBP. I'm not so sure that ages well. I'd extend the QO and pursue a number of other of other options.  To me, it's better to get the draft pick and, say, sign a guy like Tyler O'Neill, Joc Pederson, or Jurickson Profar as your DH/OF type and maybe give RF to Kjerstad.
    • I'm bringing back: Offense/Defense C - Adley SS - Gunnar 3B - Westburg 2B - Holliday 1B - Mountcastle DH - Kjerstad LF - Cowser CF - Cowser/Mullins RF - ? Backup OF - ? Backup C - ? Utility - Urias Starting Pitchers SP1: Eflin SP2: Grayson SP3: Acquire somebody SP4: Kremer SP5: Suarez Relievers Closer: Felix Setup: Cano Late Relief: Webb Late Relief: Coulombe Late Relief: Perez Middle/Long Relief: Akin Reliever: ? Reliever: ? Depth SP: Povich, McDermott, Rogers RP: McDermott I'm bringing back, but not giving a spot to: Mayo Rogers Guys I'm giving a QO offer to: Burnes Santander - I really go back and forth with Santander. He's not great in the outfield. His average and OBP is a liability. But his power is prolific. Does that age well? I don't think so. I'd extend the QO and move on. I'm not bringing back: Mateo - had surgery at the end of August, could he be back in the middle of the season next year? Sure, but he's a FA after next season, and paying over $3m for a guy that might not play nor be effective isn't an adequate use of money Dominguez - I could be convinced to keep him if we're desperate Soto - was a poor acquisition not just because of the talent given up, but because he was always a situational guy with control issues O'Hearn - $8m for a guy that really shouldn't be in the field and can only hit righties is a lot of loot Santander - Give a QO, move on Eloy - Duh This means we need to acquire the following: Starting Pitcher(s) The O's can't go into next season giving Povich a spot and they definitely can not give a spot to Rogers. Rogers needs to be a deep depth arm until he showcases an increase in velocity and/or incredible promise that he can be serviceable and not a WHIP disaster who can barely go 5. Targets: Snell, Burnes, Fried, Wacha, Severino, Morton, etc.  Reliever(s) No more Phillies castoffs. No more waiver wire, dumpster diving for the entire bullpen. No more washed up vets.  Targets: David Robertson, Tommy Kahnle, Blake Treinen, Andrew Kittredge, Tanner Scott, etc. Position Player(s) Backup C (give more time to the backup if a better hitter so Adley can be fresh throughout year) Targets: Elias Diaz, Travis d'Arnaud (although I reckon the Braves pickup his option), Jacob Stallings. I guess if they're desperate they can stick with Blake Hunt (in the minors) Corner OF We could always acquire a bat first OF and then put Kjerstad in the OF. Targets: Tyler O'Neill, Jurickson Profar, Joc Pederson, etc. Backup OF Could be Mullins if they, say, call up Beavers and sign another OF, otherwise these are a dime a dozen out there. Just get somebody that can platoon since it's a heavy LHH OF right now. I'd entertain the O's calling up Beavers. 
    • I don't think Davis continued to put in the same level of effort on his fitness after he signed the huge deal.  
    • I think he easily surpasses 3/$55 million in this year's market, so it's kind of a moot point. "QO, take it or leave it" is still my final answer.
    • I would bet there are people in their mid to late 40's that don't remember the O's World Series win.  My dad wasn't a big sports guy and back then family's had one TV.  I don't remember much about sports before the O's coming up just short in 1982.  Definitely don't remember 1979 World Series even though I was 9.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...