Jump to content

Winter 2022 40-Man Additions


luismatos4prez

Recommended Posts

There is one reason why Maverick Handley won’t be added.  Cody Roberts.  For all of the talk about Handley, their stats are very comparable offensively and defensively.   They split the catching duties at Bowie in half.  Roberts, according to Adam Pool, even has the stronger arm.   Even if Handley is exposed and taken, they still have his clone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, RZNJ said:

There is one reason why Maverick Handley won’t be added.  Cody Roberts.  For all of the talk about Handley, their stats are very comparable offensively and defensively.   They split the catching duties at Bowie in half.  Roberts, according to Adam Pool, even has the stronger arm.   Even if Handley is exposed and taken, they still have his clone.

Roberts Is someone we never hear much about.  I agree that the stats we can see are similar between the two.  Of course, we don’t really know if one is considered a better framer than the other.   And, Handley is two years younger, which can be important.  I’d be interested in comments from @Tony-OHand others who’ve seen them both play.  I saw Handley twice and was impressed with his arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Roberts Is someone we never hear much about.  I agree that the stats we can see are similar between the two.  Of course, we don’t really know if one is considered a better framer than the other.   And, Handley is two years younger, which can be important.  I’d be interested in comments from @Tony-OHand others who’ve seen them both play.  I saw Handley twice and was impressed with his arm.

I don’t think it’s a matter if which one is better.  These two are low ceiling assets but similar enough that you’re not scared of risking both with astronomical odds that you’ll keep one and better than 50/50 that you’ll keep both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that number is closer to 10.

Castro

Ellis

Head 

Reed

Sulser

Chirinos

Nevin 

Odor

Diaz

Aguilar

Players like Vallimont, Zimmerman, Gillaspie, Cano, Vespi,  have value because they can be on the shuttle up and down.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'll just leave you with this:

Roberts 43 passed balls in 1558.1 inning caught (1 every 36 innings) vs Handley 14 PB in 1247 innings caught (1 every 89 innings).

I’d looked at their Bowie numbers.  Roberts 10 in 505 innings (1 every 50.5 innings), Handley 7 in 570 innings (1 every 81 innings).   Still advantage Handley, but closer, and neither particularly good.   Major league average is one every 205 innings.  My guess is that minor league PBs are higher partly due to the skill of the catchers, partly due to pitchers missing their targets badly more often.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

And Kreihbel could easily be 15

To expand on this..his ERA was over 6 in the second half and his ERA in May was almost 4 (first half ERA was 2.18).

His K rate, which was below average anyway, went to below 6.  His BB was a little higher but basically the same.  The HR rate skyrocketed. His FIP was almost 3 runs higher.

Even in the first half of the year, his FIP was 3.44.  
 

He’s a dime a dozen guy that you can shake a few out of the reliever tree.

Im not saying you must take him off but with what the Os have to add and what else they should be adding, his place shouldn’t be considered locked in.  As of now, I wouldn’t even consider having him part of the pen.  He would be AAA depth guy at best.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sense of Krehbiel is he gets worn down a little.   I don’t think he could ever be a 65-70 inning guy.   I’d protect him because I don’t agree that that type of reliever is a dime a dozen.   I’ve seen what dime a dozen relievers look like.  You take 10 guys off the waiver wire, maybe 1-2 could be as good as Krehbiel, but you’d watch a lot of bad innings from the other 8-9 trying to identify the 1-2.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Frobby said:

My sense of Krehbiel is he gets worn down a little.   I don’t think he could ever be a 65-70 inning guy.   I’d protect him because I don’t agree that that type of reliever is a dime a dozen.   I’ve seen what dime a dozen relievers look like.  You take 10 guys off the waiver wire, maybe 1-2 could be as good as Krehbiel, but you’d watch a lot of bad innings from the other 8-9 trying to identify the 1-2.   

253 relievers threw at least 30 innings this year.  He was 167th in ERA..the bottom third of the league.he’s a 5th/6th guy in your pen.  They are easy to find if you try.  They should be even easier to develop.

BTw, he was 226th in K rate.

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I feel like if we make a big trade this offseason, Drew Rom will be a guy we trade away.

I obviously could be wrong, but I get the feeling that other teams value him more than we do at this point.

What makes you think other teams value him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thanks @btdart20 I am humbled that you feel that way.  Thanks for reading my work.
    • I don't think it's anything close to 90%.  As of June the brand recognition of the cereal was under 90%. If you have two pretty similar nicknames isn't it just common sense to go with the one that isn't the street name of a drug? And for the record all I was doing was giving a personal preference.  I never said anyone couldn't do whatever the heck they wanted.
    • This is the story, or part of the story, of the last two Orioles' seasons: trying to balance winning games and reaching the postseason (and, last year and and for a long time this year, a division title) with building for the future. However you balance those two, there is a risk of harming the team. The way the Orioles have been and are being built, relying on a bunch of young position players to blossom at around the same time, enhanced that risk. Sometimes these two objectives line up pretty well, after weakening the team for a short time, as they did with Westburg, Henderson and Rutschman, and to a lesser degree Cowser. Sometimes the objectives don't fit together very well, as has been the case with Holliday and Mayo. The possibility of that misfit was, and is, inherent in the way this team was built. Maybe the harm to the team's overall performance from playing the young guys could have been reduced by better coaching or more effective communication with the coaches, but there was really no way for this team to avoid the problem.
    • He's always looked calm and capable in his mlb at-bats. Let's the ball come to him, as they say. Am optimistic.
    • Position Players: 2023: 105 wRC+, 16.0 BsR, 54.9 Off, -26.3 Def, 23.8 WAR   2024: 113 wRC+, 1.2 BsR, 90.8 Off, -26.1 Def, 27.0 WAR   The 2023 batters had a clutch score of 8.39. That number is -1.35 this season. The 2023 batters had an xwOBA of .319 (15th). That number is .328 this season (6th). The RISP was also much better last year (as we all know). Not only did they hit for a much higher average (.287 versus .246 this year), but their ISO with RISP jumped up to .195 (it was .166 in all situations).    The defense is about as valuable as last year even though they seem much less reliable. Gunnar has been more valuable defensively according to Fangraphs, the catchers have been worse, Westburg and Mullins have been slightly worse, but Frazier was awful last year at 2B (as was Hicks in the OF) and removing him while adding an elite defender in Cowser puts them about even to last year. The base running is nowhere near as good.   The pitching is slightly worse than last year (18.3 WAR and 3.91 ERA last year, 16.5 WAR and 3.93 ERA this year) but they’ve also had a ton of innings soaked up (mostly due to injuries) by guys that aren’t going to pitch for them in the playoffs. Last year, the below group threw 259 innings and gave up 159 ER’s (5.53 ERA):   Vespi, Irvin, Zimmerman, Fuji, Voth, Lopez, Gillaspie, Flaherty, Akin, Garrett, Givens, Bazardo, McKenna   This year, from they have gotten 366.1 IP from the below group, while giving up 229 ER’s (5.63 ERA):   Vieira, McCann, Krook, Heasley, Rogers, McDermott, Ramirez. Wells, Smith, Povich, Kimbrel, Irvin, Tate, Baker    That means that the rest of the pitching staff in 2023 (besides the above group) threw 1194.2 IP, giving up 472 ER for a 3.55 ERA. In 2024 besides the above group, the rest of the staff has combined for 1022.2 IP, giving up 378 ER for a 3.33 ERA. The 2023 pitching staff had a 6.03 clutch score and a 73.5 LOB%. In 2024, those numbers are -0.93 and 71.4 %. The 2023 pitchers had an xwOBA of .317 (15th). That number is .310 this season (T-9th).    In the offseason, a lot of people were saying this team might be better than last year but finish with a worse record. As frustrating as the last 3 months have been, you could easily make that case. The offense has been better overall, but much worse with RISP and less clutch. The core pitching group has arguably been as good as last year’s, they just had a lot more injuries and innings thrown by fringe guys that won’t be pitching in the playoffs. FWIW, Texas was one of the least clutch teams in the regular season last year and then were unsurprisingly the most clutch team in the playoffs. The Orioles followed up their extremely clutch regular season by being the 2nd least clutch pitching team (only PHI was worse and they played an extra 2 series) and 3rd least clutch batting team (only PHI and MIN were worse - MIN played an extra series as well).    So TLDR. They have arguably been a better team than last year that has dealt with many more injuries, had a lot more PA’s and IP’s from worse players due to those injuries, and have been extremely unclutch. Some of that might be luck, some of it might be skill, but it could change at any time. 
    • And sorta boring, like this thread.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...