Jump to content

Trade Deadline Primer/Thread


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Here are two of ESPN national writer's spitballs for Josh Bell this morning.    Outside of Buck maybe goosing a NYM bid, I'd tend to think most Clubs thinking about Mancini are also thinking about Bell.

Doolittle: Bell also makes a lot of sense for the Astros, but I'm trying to spread things around, so I'm sending him to the Cleveland Guardians. Any team acquiring Bell has to go in with its eyes open, knowing it is more likely to get the player Bell is likely to be going forward than the player who had an All-Star-level first half.

For Cleveland, Bell is an upgrade at first base in either scenario, and the Guardians would not have any trouble in meeting Washington's asking price. And if Bell is actually able to replicate his first-half production, that could be enough to get the Guardians over the top in what figures to be tight races for the AL Central title and/or the sixth playoff slot in the AL.

Schoenfield: I'm not against the San Diego Padres going for Soto, who might prove to be too irresistible for Preller -- no matter the cost. What I'm saying: Don't stop at Soto. The Padres are 18th in the majors in OPS at first base, but that includes Eric Hosmer's torrid April, which was completely out of line from all his other months the past two seasons. Since the beginning of May, they're 26th in OPS at first base. They're also just 16th in OPS from their DHs, with a collective .231/.318/.379 line that leaves plenty of room for improvement. Bell can slot in at either position and suddenly a 2-3-4 of Soto, Fernando Tatis Jr. and Bell looks like a championship middle of the order.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

His quote suggested a deal has been made. 

I think he got one right and enjoyed the limelight.  Not sure if he had actual inside information but I suspect he just reads message boards and mlbtraderumors and just uses that as his inside sources.  I caught him in some fibs.  I don't think he's legit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading Mancini takes his $3 million off the books the rest of the year. Trading Lopez takes his salary($4mill???) off the books for next season. 
 

We also have come out and said we want controllable SP. Pre-Arb and Arb???

If the deal with the Mets happens, I will salary had something to do with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

Trading Mancini takes his $3 million off the books the rest of the year. Trading Lopez takes his salary($4mill???) off the books for next season. 
 

We also have come out and said we want controllable SP. Pre-Arb and Arb???

If the deal with the Mets happens, I will salary had something to do with it. 

I don’t think payroll is much of an issue right now.   It’s nice that payroll is low so that there’s lots of room to move up in the future, but to real need to cut it now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointing to hear the Mets trade very likely won’t happen. I liked the idea of getting Peterson back. Stacking the rotation with LHP seems like a smart move…RHH will have trouble with the new dimensions and LHP limit the damage from the rest. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

Not sure how the Mets acquisition of Tyler Naquin will affect a trade for Mancini?

I wouldn't think it would affect it too much. I'd imagine most teams would want Trey as 1B/DH mostly, with an occasional OF game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PHRESH said:

Didn't they also just get Vogelbach for 1B/DH?

I forgot about Vogelbach, I think he would affect Trey more than Naquin.

Trey is an upgrade to both, but not sure the Mets would still be interested.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, billw76 said:

I forgot about Vogelbach, I think he would affect Trey more than Naquin.

Trey is an upgrade to both, but not sure the Mets would still be interested.

Vogelbach is putrid against LHP so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but think about the recent draft when I look at all of the smoke flying on twitter about what "sources" are saying the Orioles are going to trade.  Elias has a pretty strong track record of keeping things tight to the vest.  Wouldn't surprise me if we make a trade that no one saw coming.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Vogelbach is putrid against LHP so there's that.

Naquin is a lefty that's not great against LHP either, but it was noted they were looking for lefty hitters earlier so who knows. There is (potentially) still a spot for Mancini, but unsure it's a significant enough one for the Mets to offer enough to make us pull the trigger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jagwar said:

I know Sirloin didn't have the best record around here, but it doesn't mean his rumor has to be "phony". Isn't it possible the Mets had a couple of irons in the fire with different teams?

The mods here including Weams knew him to be illegitimate. I’m not sure why he was allowed to post his spooge on the site. But, it’s not my business regardless of their reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...