Jump to content

Why isn’t Stowers here?


ManciniFan

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, LookinUp said:

The O's paid for their roster decisions last night.

It's the 9th inning, Urias is on first and we hit Mateo.

That's not good. Phillips pinch ran. We had Mateo scheduled with Nevin, Chirinos and McKenna on the bench. If we pinch run for Urias, it should have been McKenna and a really potent bat should have pinch hit for Mateo.

Mateo has had some key Homeruns as he almost did on the first pitch. Stowers strikes out at a pretty high rate….I’m guessing (near 30%?).

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Mateo has hot some key Homeruns as he almost did on the first pitch. Stowers strikes out at a pretty high rate….I’m guessing (near 30%?).

My point is that if we want to keep guys in the lineup because of their defense, you should have a bat to go to when needed. We're keeping people in the lineup because of their defense and focusing on defense for our bench. 

Right now, this roster is poorly constructed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LookinUp said:

The O's paid for their roster decisions last night.

It's the 9th inning, Urias is on first and we hit Mateo.

That's not good. Phillips pinch ran. We had Mateo scheduled with Nevin, Chirinos and McKenna on the bench. If we pinch run for Urias, it should have been McKenna and a really potent bat should have pinch hit for Mateo.

Since July 1, Mateo has an .827 OPS, .352 wOBA, and 129 wRC+. He was a fine option in that spot.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

My point is that if we want to keep guys in the lineup because of their defense, you should have a bat to go to when needed. We're keeping people in the lineup because of their defense and focusing on defense for our bench. 

Right now, this roster is poorly constructed.

What @Sydnorsaid 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Re: age, I'm not bothered. He's 24. There was a Covid year. He's been ready for months. 

I think he's essentially Santander but more likely to be healthy, play better defense and be cheaper. 

Santander struck out in about 20% of PAs in AAA, and is now striking out a bit over 20% of PAs in the majors.  Stowers strikes out 6% more in AAA, so even if he somehow holds serve on that K rate upon promotion he'll have to have a really smokin' BABIP to hit .250.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Santander struck out in about 20% of PAs in AAA, and is now striking out a bit over 20% of PAs in the majors.  Stowers strikes out 6% more in AAA, so even if he somehow holds serve on that K rate upon promotion he'll have to have a really smokin' BABIP to hit .250.

Stowers k's more than Santander, but also walks more than Santander. It seems like he's more of a selective hitter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Stowers k's more than Santander, but also walks more than Santander. It seems like he's more of a selective hitter. 

Yes, probably.  Santander's development is hard to draw conclusions from because of the combinations of Rule 5 and injury, not that I didn't do exactly that by quoting his AAA K rate.  But Santander went from A ball straight to the Orioles to the DL back to AAA and the majors...  who knows what would have happened if he'd just been on the Stowers track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2022 at 10:35 AM, RZNJ said:

Everyone!  Inhale.  Hold it a few seconds.  Exhale.

Your team has the best farm system in baseball.   It has gotten deeper in the last 2 weeks.   The international program is beginning to produce.   The ML team, which no one thought would even be a .500 team, is in contention for a wildcard.

Mike Elias chief focus is player development.    Kyle Stowers is 24 years old.   If he gets called up now, they Orioles will have control through his age 30 season.   Mike Elias says they are having discussions  daily about brining up Stowers.   So why don't they?   First, where's he going to play.  With Vavra at DH most of the time, and Hays, Mullins, Santander healthy, there's not spot for him.   His manager, most likely, is telling him all is fine with Odor at 2B.   In fact, he's probably telling him he wants Odor at 2B.   Tough to argue against it with the team's current situation.

Just looked at video of Stowers from last night.   We forget sometimes that these guys are still learning.   Stowers is learning to cut down on his swing at certain times.  Just watch the video from last night.   Henderson is learning to hit LHP.   Westburg is learning not to get pull happy and put himself into long slumps.   In the long run the team will be better that these adjustments were made before they were called up.   In the short term, you have a total surprise team whose manager is happy with what he's got.  For now.

On paper, there's no doubt that you can upgrade by benching Odor, putting Henderson at 3B and Urias at 2B  or putting Vavra at 2B and putting Stowers into the DH/OF mix.   Hyde and Elias could be wrong.  Maybe they are but Hyde knows his clubhouse and has a good feel for his team.   If the decision is to go with his guys, I'm not going to sweat it.    

Agreed. I get that it's a business and nothing is personal but I would hate to be the guy that takes a team that is exceeding all expectations, is in the hunt for a WC, and benches/cuts multiple players that helped get them there. We can quibble about how much they helped but you know what I mean.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me the question comes down to is Stowers better than Phillips? I'll say yes. Granted Phillips has had some nice AAA seasons, but has not been productive during his stays in the bigs. Stowers has displayed some legit power despite his high K rate, and is clearly better defensively than Santander. DH Santander, play Vavra at 2B at least part of the time, and play Stowers/McKenna in the corner not occupied by Hays. 

Edited by Gentile4
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

For me the question comes down to is Stowers better than Phillips? I'll say yes. Granted Phillips has had some nice AAA seasons, but has not been productive during his stays in the bigs. Stowers has displayed some legit power despite his high K rate, and is clearly better defensively than Santander. DH Santander, play Vavra at 2B at least part of the time, and play Stowers/McKenna in the corner not occupied by Hays. 

Wouldn't the question be, would you rather give Stowers AB's every day or have him up to get similar reps to what Phillips is getting currently.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

For me the question comes down to is Stowers better than Phillips? I'll say yes. Granted Phillips has had some nice AAA seasons, but has not been productive during his stays in the bigs. Stowers has displayed some legit power despite his high K rate, and is clearly better defensively than Santander. DH Santander, play Vavra at 2B at least part of the time, and play Stowers/McKenna in the corner not occupied by Hays. 

I think we also have to ask if he would get regular playing time or sit on the bench alot.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2022 at 3:31 PM, LookinUp said:

Yeah, and Santander really has had a nice year at the dish. .199 ISO. 126 wRC+. Good player. Maybe better as a DH though.

I think we sell “high” on Santander in the offseason. Whether that is for an MLB player or not is the wildcard. I think we take the best package and buy a SP with prospects that we “like”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gentile4 said:

For me the question comes down to is Stowers better than Phillips? I'll say yes. Granted Phillips has had some nice AAA seasons, but has not been productive during his stays in the bigs. Stowers has displayed some legit power despite his high K rate, and is clearly better defensively than Santander. DH Santander, play Vavra at 2B at least part of the time, and play Stowers/McKenna in the corner not occupied by Hays. 

No doubt he is better than Phillips, but I don't think we want to call him up to be a pinch runner/5th OF. The question is whether he is better than one of our top 9-10 everyday guys. Right now I see McKenna as the 9th guy and I'm not sure Stowers is better. He is probably better than Odor but Vavra seems to have already pushed Odor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I imagine the goal is to get him available to just give them anything out of the pen in the wild card round. Depending on how that goes and if the O’s can advance who knows. 
    • The interesting thing about 1B is Mayo.     Elias keeps pushing Mayo at 3B.   But if Westburg is healthy he is better at 3B.   And they don't seem to play Mayo has much as they could at 1B where he might have a better chance at a regular job.    DH might be his best position. If Santander leaves, then Kjerstad probably gets an every day spot at RF.   Elias might want to see Kjerstad hit well in RF before he hands over 2B to Holliday.   Too many struggling rookies at the same time is not good for wins.   Mayo is  behind Kjerstad and Holliday IMO in getting a lot of playing time. However, developing Kjerstad, Holliday and Mayo  are key parts of the O's future no  matter how Elias develops them.
    • Walker is definitely an upgrade over Mountcastle.  Walker has cleared an .800 OPS the past three seasons.  Mountcastle has only done it once -- his rookie year.  Plus Mountcastle hasn't even cleared 20 homers since 2022.  Mountcastle is good in a platoon, used against lefties, but otherwise he's fallen off. Walker is 33, which is a bit of a risk, but which makes me think he could be had on a short term deal.  That said I think the O's will have competition for Walker.  He's one of the most underrated bats in the league.   If the O's think Kjerstad can play 1B then I think they should maybe go with him and look for a new RF (unless they bring back Santander, which seems more unlikely now).  But I don't know about Kjerstad's glove there. Mayo's glove at 1B may be even more questionable than Kjerstad's.  Plus Mayo just hasn't shown he's ready with his bat yet.  I'm against assuming guys will figure out how to hit MLB pitching within a presumed timeframe.  Mayo hasn't shown he's there yet.  Let him work his way into the lineup rather than giving him a starting job.  But with him there's also the issue of where his defense plays best, or if it plays anywhere.
    • So either Grayson won’t face hitters this year (ie he’s done for the year) or he’s in the pen.
    • I feel better after getting a W against the Giants; somewhere along the way I had stated I felt we almost had to get at least one from them, and now we have.  However, lets not act like this one win means the offense has broken its slump and we're suddenly going to start rolling.  I hope we do, but we're one bad game away from feeling like we'll never score a run again.  If we go down 3-0 or something early tonight, it will be hard to resist the doomsday feeling - we're just as likely to get one-hit or something stupid like that tonight as we are to score 5 or 6 runs.  Its a tough schedule to finish the season, tougher than maybe we would have thought with Detroit playing so well.  Still not counting my chickens but yeah that W yesterday changed the calculus a good bit in our favor.
    • Update: As expected, the corresponding move for Coulombe is Burch Smith, but he's going on the IL instead of being DFA'd. Right adductor/groin strain.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...