Jump to content

Hang on just a little bit longer....


SteveA

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

There’s plenty of reasons the record could be worse next year.  For one thing, the O’s are three games over their Pythagorean record.  Second, the bullpen is full of guys having career years.  Reverting back below the league leading save percentage will drop some wins.  Third, the team has had almost zero position player injuries.  And, we certainly have starters who could regress.  

I shared this over the weekend on OH elsewhere, but it gets into how the Giants had an even more dramatic regression, ie. 107 wins last year to sub .500 this year. It can definitely happen to the O's. I don't want it to happen, of course. 

 

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/34549809/why-san-francisco-giants-gone-107-wins-sub-500

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I consider what happened to the Giants this year to be water finding its level.  That team won 107 games last year with about 80 win talent on the roster.  The amount of guys overachieving on that team was remarkable and it seemed like every night some scrub would come up with a clutch hit to win them the game.  They beat the Dodgers out of the division by 1 game and I am not sure they would have had more than 2 players that could have started for the Dodgers.  So where they are now looks about right.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, JR Oriole said:

I consider what happened to the Giants this year to be water finding its level.  That team won 107 games last year with about 80 win talent on the roster.  The amount of guys overachieving on that team was remarkable and it seemed like every night some scrub would come up with a clutch hit to win them the game.  They beat the Dodgers out of the division by 1 game and I am not sure they would have had more than 2 players that could have started for the Dodgers.  So where they are now looks about right.  

I would agree with this.

The positive thing for the Orioles moving forward is that offensively you don't really have anyone having a "career year", similar to Mullins last year.  I think there's a decent chance you could run back the exact same offense next year (with Adley and Gunnar) and get significantly better results.  Of course I hope they don't do that and look to supplement and improve the position players.

On the other hand I fully expect the pitching to regress at least a bit, and the bullpen in particular.

I think a lot of the bones of a very good team are there, now we'll see if Elias can complete the job.

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, SteveA said:

We had 3 chances at Toronto... and we blew the first one.   Badly.

Since we have 6 games left with Toronto, we are technically not at the point yet where we HAVE to depend on other teams.   Win all 6 and we catch the Jays.   That's a big ask of course, and very unlikely.  But we are not yet officially at the point where we are dependent on other teams.   We probably  will be after Sunday, barring a great sequence of events in the next few days.

While Labor Day, or last Saturday, or Sunday seemed to be the last straw for most people on the Hangout, I think the Orioles braintrust is going to stay in what they consider "compete mode" through the trip to Toronto, which means through Sunday.   If we haven't significantly closed the gap by then, you might see them do things that look more to the future than to trying to win this year.   But I don't think they have made that mental leap yet like most around here have.

It’s funny to me that you have to explain…well, magic….to someone with the user handle @OriolesMagic83

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

It would have been boring if we strolled into the playoffs 3 or 4 games ahead….

Teams that clinch playoff spots earlier can sometimes be flat once the playoffs start. Won't be any danger of that with this Orioles team. 

Plus, I'm hoping the team's secret weapon Grayson Rodriguez makes his debut before the season ends. 

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Teams that clinch playoff spots earlier can sometimes be flat once the playoffs start. Won't be any danger of that with this Orioles teams. 

Plus, I'm hoping the team's secret weapon Grayson Rodriguez makes his debut before the season ends. 

It’s been a while since we’ve “played well”.  Last 20 games would be a hell of a time to go on a run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2022 at 8:45 AM, NashLumber said:

I shared this over the weekend on OH elsewhere, but it gets into how the Giants had an even more dramatic regression, ie. 107 wins last year to sub .500 this year. It can definitely happen to the O's. I don't want it to happen, of course. 

 

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/34549809/why-san-francisco-giants-gone-107-wins-sub-500

Tigers went 77-85 last year and folks were excited about their rebuild.  They bought in the offseason.

Currently 55-89.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2022 at 2:51 PM, Gurgi said:

Its over.   Elias probably did the right thing by dumping Mancini and Lopez but it hurt.  But what really hurt is he did nothing to improve the team after the trades.   Not bringing up propects just for clock reasons.  We way over played ourselves and looked for a moment like we could get a wild card spot.  But Elias never had that in the plans.  If we were going to get in it would be in spite of the front office.  

It was a fun ride but its over.   Funny thing is next year we could be worse than this year.  Much like the 90 Orioles were a big empty compared to 89.  All it would take is for several of our shock over performing starters to have a crap year.  Throw in some bullpen problems and its quite possible next year the Orioles will be worse.   You never know.  

Definitely. That's why they should have gone for it this year. You never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chaka Garcia said:

It seems we are ok with position players. The pitching is a deep concern - don’t see who we could sign or trade for that’s better than Lyles. As I see it - pitching is a scarcity and we are fighting every other team to find that resource.

We can but may not. Grayson will likely be better than Lyles even as a rookie. The real question is whether Hall, Bradish, Kremer, Wells, Voth can progress a bit more .. or regress.. i obviously think DL can be much better than he showed and the next three  can likely  be even better than this year .. Voth i think is likely to regress

A productive veteran bat is really most important to me.. a 2014 Nelson Cruz realllly sent that team smoking. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • 2 walks and a hard hit in 5 batters is good?  If Baker gets out of it, they would not start the next inning with Akin facing the lefty masher Garver. Akin would probably sit down at that point and they would go to Webb or Tate. 
    • FIPS does not work well for pitchers that pitch to contact. It's kind of weird.   Managers want starters to go deep in games.  Eating innings is encouraged. In order for a pitcher to do that he needs to pitch to contact to lower his number of pitches per inning.  But balls in play are not counted in FIP. So when French talks in favor of FIP is he saying that he wants his pitchers to go for strike outs and not pitch to contact?  Make up your mind coach.   Either you want pitchers to go deep in games or strike out more batters. 
    • The last column is the number of runners inherited. Those are not the number of runners the RP allowed to score.    Akin has inherited 24 runners, 8 have scored. Coming into yesterday he was at 21/5.  
    • SWEEP…because why the hell not? Meanwhile, take some long looks at the guys on the Shelf at Oakland-Mart. Id love to have Rooker( even though we don’t really need him)as well as some of their pitching, and we match up with Oakland better than any other team, because we have a plethora of solid prospects who are a year or two away and wouldn’t be wasted before Oakland’s next window.  
    • Lefty Depth: Coulombe, Perez, Akin, Vespi, Krook, Gonzalez, McGough All of those guys miss more bats than McGough. Krook just got called up so he's clearly ahead in the depth chart. And this is off-topic but Akin is good if you look at his overall numbers this year. People are too hard on him because he looks like a goofball.
    • People expected him to be the savior when he arrived.  It was the first failure he ever experienced in his career.  Pretty incredible for his first ever  slump/failure to come at the MLB level at age 20.  Most folks face adversity well before then. 
    • I’d like to see Holliday back after ASB. Would like to see him cut down K’s and mini tear before that.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...