Jump to content

Does the MLB and ESPN want America to pick sides?


NewMarketSean

Recommended Posts

And become either Yankees or Red Sox fans?

That is the impression that I get. They are probably making money hand over fist with this rivalry so there is no reason for them to change anytime soon.

2011 will be the next work stoppage for a salary cap... I hope.

Do they want them to be "either" Cowboys or Steelers fans?

Either Lakers or Celtics fans?

Did they care about any of those teams during the different down periods they have had during the past 15 years of the ESPN-Hype era?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB according to ESPN:

AL- Red Sox, Yankees, Angels

NL- Mets, Cubs, Dodgers

And, like the poster above, I do believe that the MLB, NFL, and NHL Networks will begin to pull away viewers from ESPN. It may not be a drastic viewing change, but I believe some avid fans will go to the official sports' channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB according to ESPN:

AL- Red Sox, Yankees, Angels

NL- Mets, Cubs, Dodgers

And, like the poster above, I do believe that the MLB, NFL, and NHL Networks will begin to pull away viewers from ESPN. It may not be a drastic viewing change, but I believe some avid fans will go to the official sports' channel.

I certainly will. If the MLB Network actually has balanced coverage that doesn't cover NYY and Boston out of proportion (they can get more coverage because they are good teams, but no more than the other division leaders and top contenders)....then I will jump to their show in a minute and never watch Baseball Tonight again.

I just got home from work and have fired up the Hot Stove show that aired from 7 to 8 on my DVR. It's the first I have sen of it. It's been all about the news of the day -- the Burrell and Bradley signings, Pohlad's death. How refreshing! Actually covering the news even if it doesn't involve the Yankees or Sox. I'm cautiously optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they want them to be "either" Cowboys or Steelers fans?

Either Lakers or Celtics fans?

Pretty much. And maybe the Cavaliers too, but only until LeBron leaves for Europe.

Did they care about any of those teams during the different down periods they have had during the past 15 years of the ESPN-Hype era?

It was a much different era 15 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the MLB. It's just MLB. Just like you wouldn't say, "Does the NASA want America to pick their favorite space shuttle?" Although maybe you should.

And to answer your question, I personally think that there are a surprising amount of folks at both companies that think that if you don't pull for one of those teams, you must pull for the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And become either Yankees or Red Sox fans?

That is the impression that I get. They are probably making money hand over fist with this rivalry so there is no reason for them to change anytime soon.

2011 will be the next work stoppage for a salary cap... I hope.

YESPNESN...of course.

MLB Network...less likely, as it has to answer to all 30 teams.

And remember, a salary cap without enhanced revenue sharing is simply a way to make the rich teams more profitable. This problem must be addressed from the revenue side...the salary issue will then mostly take care of itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YESPNESN...of course.

MLB Network...less likely, as it has to answer to all 30 teams.

And remember, a salary cap without enhanced revenue sharing is simply a way to make the rich teams more profitable. This problem must be addressed from the revenue side...the salary issue will then mostly take care of itself.

Well I think that is what the owners will be going for. Steinbrenner will never go for enhance revenue sharing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much. And maybe the Cavaliers too, but only until LeBron leaves for Europe.

It was a much different era 15 years ago.

I'm not talking about 1993/1994. I mean during that whole SPAN.

We didn't hear much about the Celtics during their down years, nor the Cowboys. Even the Steelers don't get much press when they are 8-8 and out of the race fairly early.

If the Yankees go into another mid-80s down period (which would be difficult considering their resources, but that really is a separate discussion), they will get a year of "What's happening to the Yankees?" every day, but after that their press will go down fast outside of the big signing or manager firing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think that is what the owners will be going for. Steinbrenner will never go for enhance revenue sharing.

If he's outvoted 29-1, what's he gonna do...secede? Think anybody'd miss him?

If the Yankees go into another mid-80s down period (which would be difficult considering their resources, but that really is a separate discussion), they will get a year of "What's happening to the Yankees?" every day, but after that their press will go down fast outside of the big signing or manager firing.

The Yankee$ go into "down periods" only when their ownership is incompetent (see CBS in the sixties) or insane (see much of the reign of George III). One can only hope that Hamfisted Hank is a delicious combination of...both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Just add Mayo and Cowser to your list and the roster makes sense.
    • Let's look at the roster requirements.  The active MLB roster allows 26 players. Now do we have 4 outfielders or 5? I would assume we keep at least 13 pitchers with 8 of those in the bullpen. So that would leave 13 position players at best. 2 Catchers, 2 1Bmen, + Gunnar/Mateo/Urias/Westburg as IF utility. So that's 8 infielders all practically guaranteed to make the team from seniority on 2 winning Orioles teams, plus the 3 starting outfielders in Hays/Mullins/Santander. What we have are likely 2 outfield positions, with one of those possibly being another infield uitlity player, but maybe not probable. If they have 2 bench outfielders then at least one of those is probably preferred to be a left handed batter and the other probably to be a right handed batter. They might also want someone who has the skills to play centerfield, unless the scenario that either Mateo or Hays is thought to be the primary backup center-fielder. Which could be a very good idea in order to allow a corner outfielder on the roster.
    • How so? They knew Bradish had a season-threatening injury a month before the trade with Milwaukee, and that Burnes was therefore just filling a hole rather than serving as a true addition to the rotation. ...who merely replaced the incumbent ace of the staff, who may not pitch at all for us in 2024. No real upgrade has actually occurred.  
    • I have to say, if we’re still at a point where signing some SP5 has to be contingent in any way on dumping $3.5M of Ryan O’Hearn — that would be so very disheartening.  I get why folks want to see Kjerstad over O’Hearn. We all want to see Kjerstad. We all want to see the very exciting all-homegrown-prospect lineups we’ve been pontificating about ad nauseum for years now.  But we’re trying to win it all this season, and O’Hearn had a higher wRC+ in the bigs last year than Kjerstad did in AAA. Just dumping a guy who was a critical part of the lineup last year on blind faith seems a bit rash. And unnecessary.  Maybe O’Hearn regresses to his pre-2023 form. Maybe Kjerstad absolutely rakes. The nice thing is, we have the luxury of letting it all play out. It’s a very long season. If O’Hearn hits his way off the team — or Kjerstad hits his way onto it — then great. That’s a miscalculation we can easily (and happily) correct. But if you ship O’Hearn out and then Kjerstad can’t hack it (or gets hurt, that’s much tougher to un-do. 
    • I love the sound of that crack of the bat. It means spring is almost here!
    • Thanks for this. I was actually thinking earlier while browsing the message board that I wanted to follow Hall and was thinking about looking up his stat page.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...