Jump to content

40-Man Additions for Rule 5 Deadline


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Very informative page on Fangraphs:

https://www.fangraphs.com/roster-resource/breakdowns/40-man-roster

Team 40-man Count Homegrown % Free Agent % Trade % Waivers % Rule 5 % Rank Homegrown Rank Free Agent Rank Trade
NYM 31 41.9% 19.4% 32.3% 6.5% 0.0% 16 12 18
CHC 33 51.5% 21.2% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 12 8 22
COL 33 57.6% 18.2% 18.2% 6.1% 0.0% 9 12 29
SDP 33 27.3% 27.3% 45.5% 0.0% 0.0% 28 4 8
BAL 34 35.3% 8.8% 23.5% 26.5% 5.9% 19 25 26
LAD 34 58.8% 14.7% 17.6% 8.8% 0.0% 4 15 29
TEX 34 38.2% 11.8% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16 24 6
HOU 35 68.6% 5.7% 22.9% 0.0% 2.9% 3 28 26
MIL 35 31.4% 22.9% 42.9% 2.9% 0.0% 22 5 8
CHW 36 55.6% 13.9% 25.0% 5.6% 0.0% 4 15 22
MIN 36 55.6% 2.8% 36.1% 5.6% 0.0% 4 29 12
PHI 36 47.4% 13.2% 31.6% 7.9% 0.0% 11 15 14
SEA 36 22.2% 13.9% 52.8% 8.3% 2.8% 29 15 4
BOS 37 27.0% 16.2% 37.8% 13.5% 5.4% 27 12 11
NYY 37 32.4% 18.9% 43.2% 2.7% 2.7% 19 8 7
OAK 37 16.2% 13.5% 51.4% 16.2% 2.7% 30 15 4
STL 38 50.0% 13.2% 31.6% 2.6% 2.6% 9 15 14
WSN 38 28.9% 28.9% 26.3% 15.8% 0.0% 22 3 18
ARI 39 33.3% 12.8% 33.3% 17.9% 2.6% 16 15 12
TOR 39 38.5% 20.5% 38.5% 2.6% 0.0% 15 5 8
ATL 40 42.5% 30.0% 22.5% 5.0% 0.0% 12 1 22
CIN 40 50.0% 17.5% 25.0% 7.5% 0.0% 4 8 18
CLE 40 65.0% 7.5% 22.5% 2.5% 2.5% 1 25 22
DET 40 50.0% 12.5% 20.0% 12.5% 5.0% 4 15 26
KCR 40 62.5% 12.5% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 15 18
LAA 40 42.5% 20.0% 27.5% 7.5% 2.5% 12 5 16
MIA 40 27.5% 17.5% 50.0% 2.5% 2.5% 22 8 3
PIT 40 30.0% 2.5% 52.5% 15.0% 0.0% 19 29 2
SFG 40 27.5% 30.0% 27.5% 15.0% 0.0% 22 1 16
TBR 40 27.5% 7.5% 60.0% 2.5% 2.5% 22 25 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and a link to the Payroll as well... 

https://www.fangraphs.com/roster-resource/breakdowns/payroll

Team Rank Payroll 2023 Payroll Projection Guaranteed % Arbitration % Pre-Arbitration % 2024 Commitments 2025 Commitments 2026 Commitments
OAK 30 $35M 0.0% 40.6% 59.4% $0 $0 $0
BAL 29 $41M 7.4% 45.9% 46.7% $0 $0 $0
PIT 28 $50M 33.3% 32.4% 34.3% $7M $7M $7M
TBR 27 $71M 35.6% 51.9% 12.5% $47M $11M $15M
CLE 26 $72M 26.2% 52.7% 21.1% $25M $30M $35M
KCR 25 $77M 42.1% 38.9% 18.9% $30M $23M $2M
CIN 24 $77M 56.3% 24.9% 18.8% $11M $0 $0
MIA 23 $101M 42.7% 44.8% 12.5% $34M $32M $25M
MIN 22 $101M 49.1% 37.2% 13.6% $19M $18M $16M
WSN 21 $102M 59.9% 24.8% 15.3% $70M $35M $35M
ARI 20 $102M 58.3% 28.2% 13.4% $38M $18M $17M
SFG 19 $115M 61.6% 28.6% 9.9% $21M $0 $0
DET 18 $117M 66.2% 22.7% 11.1% $51M $41M $39M
TEX 17 $122M 77.4% 10.8% 11.8% $74M $72M $58M
CHC 16 $127M 64.6% 18.4% 17.0% $50M $20M $20M
MIL 15 $130M 31.8% 62.1% 6.2% $33M $31M $32M
SEA 14 $131M 74.2% 18.4% 7.4% $101M $91M $82M
BOS 13 $134M 62.4% 29.6% 8.0% $57M $29M $33M
STL 12 $157M 71.2% 23.0% 5.8% $76M $40M $22M
COL 11 $157M 82.9% 8.7% 8.4% $91M $72M $76M
LAA 10 $161M 82.9% 8.2% 9.0% $91M $83M $77M
HOU 9 $164M 75.5% 17.4% 7.2% $115M $47M $45M
LAD 8 $170M 59.6% 34.8% 5.6% $74M $70M $61M
CHW 7 $173M 78.4% 15.5% 6.0% $88M $24M $2M
PHI 6 $179M 77.5% 13.6% 8.9% $116M $91M $48M
NYY 5 $190M 70.2% 25.3% 4.5% $96M $90M $78M
TOR 4 $194M 63.5% 32.7% 3.8% $75M $66M $66M
ATL 3 $196M 83.1% 12.3% 4.6% $109M $97M $93M
SDP 2 $204M 67.0% 26.8% 6.1% $95M $98M $81M
NYM 1 $237M 79.6% 15.6% 4.8% $133M $75M $55M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing Payroll vs. 40 man roster before the 6 PM Deadline today...

Team Rule 5 % 40-man Count Rank Payroll 2023 Payroll Projection
NYM 0.00% 31 1 $237M
CHC 0.00% 33 16 $127M
COL 0.00% 33 11 $157M
SDP 0.00% 33 2 $204M
BAL 5.90% 34 29 $41M
LAD 0.00% 34 8 $170M
TEX 0.00% 34 17 $122M
HOU 2.90% 35 9 $164M
MIL 0.00% 35 15 $130M
CHW 0.00% 36 7 $173M
MIN 0.00% 36 22 $101M
PHI 0.00% 36 6 $179M
SEA 2.80% 36 14 $131M
BOS 5.40% 37 13 $134M
NYY 2.70% 37 5 $190M
OAK 2.70% 37 30 $35M
STL 2.60% 38 12 $157M
WSN 0.00% 38 21 $102M
ARI 2.60% 39 20 $102M
TOR 0.00% 39 4 $194M
ATL 0.00% 40 3 $196M
CIN 0.00% 40 24 $77M
CLE 2.50% 40 26 $72M
DET 5.00% 40 18 $117M
KCR 0.00% 40 25 $77M
LAA 2.50% 40 10 $161M
MIA 2.50% 40 23 $101M
PIT 0.00% 40 28 $50M
SFG 0.00% 40 19 $115M
TBR 2.50% 40 27 $71M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Pickles said:

Rom's getting protected.

I would not be so sure. Rom is similar in stuff to Zach Lowther and we saw him flame out pretty hard. I've been disappointed with his development overall and would not be surprised if he's left unprotected.

Now saying that, he could be a depth guy this year and could provide some long relief type role if needed, so I'd probably protect him over several players on the roster, starting with Tyler Nevin who has no role on a major league 40-man roster.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deadline is precisely 6pm this evening, so whatever wheeling and dealing the Rays, Guardians, Dodgers and any others have to do with their Deep Depth farm systems will all be this afternoon.

Will Elias with his newfound financial might find an Arb2 or Arb3 guy he wants to pay, and does his improving system have anything at the lower levels famous hoarders like CLE or TB would want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice to see some MiLB trades/reallocation of resources from some non-Rule 5 toward some Rule-5 roster casualties that we can protect.  Maybe toward SPs or 1Bs?

Here's MLB.com's list of tough decisions:

Toughest Rule 5 Draft decisions for each team (mlb.com)

And here's the MLB.com's list of top 30 players (per their rankings) who need to be protected:

Rule 5 Draft prospects protected on 40-man rosters (mlb.com)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I would not be so sure. Rom is similar in stuff to Zach Lowther and we saw him flame out pretty hard. I've been disappointed with his development overall and would not be surprised if he's left unprotected.

Now saying that, he could be a depth guy this year and could provide some long relief type role if needed, so I'd probably protect him over several players on the roster, starting with Tyler Nevin who has no role on a major league 40-man roster.

Well, personally, I'd be shocked, but I'm not near as plugged in as you, and obviously as the FO is.  I think he still has starter upside, and he could survive and contribute in a limited bullpen role as soon as next year.  To me, that makes him an ideal Rule 5 pick, and somebody that should be protected.

But I cede to the experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I would not be so sure. Rom is similar in stuff to Zach Lowther and we saw him flame out pretty hard. I've been disappointed with his development overall and would not be surprised if he's left unprotected.

Now saying that, he could be a depth guy this year and could provide some long relief type role if needed, so I'd probably protect him over several players on the roster, starting with Tyler Nevin who has no role on a major league 40-man roster.

I’d be really surprised if Rom was unprotected.  You’ve not been very high on him the last year or two, but this organization is thin on pitching and Rom is in AAA and still pretty young.   I think they’ll give him his chance to sink or swim.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Tony is spot on about Rom.  While I think they will ultimately protect him, I get why they wouldn’t if they choose not to.

My gripe would be that severaL players on the 40 man should go before Rom but if I’m just looking at Rom himself, I could see him being left off.  Personally, I don’t see him as a guy who would stick all year on a ML roster, so we would end up with him anyway.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spy Fox said:

We're the highest in the league at 26.5% waivers. The next highest is 16.2%. Several teams are at 0%. 

Not totally surprising but there was a time when the narrative was that Elias was good a drafting but bad at evaluating MLB talent. Now he can check that box, at least as far as waiver wire is concerned. Next step is to sign a couple of free agents to put us over the top. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, btdart20 said:

Interesting, they have Rom as our "tough decision." Does that mean Denoyer has jumped ahead of him as a lock, or they think Denoyer is more of a lock to be unprotected? I really hope it's not the latter as he had an outstanding year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • First 16 starts from: GRod - 5.44 ERA, 4.60 FIP, 1.407 WHIP, 9.6 SO/9, 1.6 HR/9, 3.6 BB/9 Bradish - 5.63 ERA, 4.89 FIP, 1.538 WHIP, 8.9 SO/9, 1.7 HR/9, 3.3 BB/9 Povich - 5.20 ERA, 4.79 FIP, 1.431 WHIP, 7.8 SO/9, 1.4 HR/9, 3.8 BB/9
    • I don't know of anywhere that has exactly what you are looking for. Statcast will tell you for every ball hit how many parks it would have gone out of, but I don't know how you could easily translate to one number of HR added/taken away.  For what it's worth, we were #2 in road HR, #3 in home HR, #4 in road OPS, #8 at home. Slight disadvantage but it's not like it makes the difference between an amazing offense and a bad one. Plus, presumably the other team has the same challenges. Theoretically, it should be an efficiency that we can exploit in building our team. Players that would be more valuable to us than other teams would be: LH power hitters (Gunnar, Kjerstad, Cowser, Mullins, O'Hearn) Speedy left fielder who would be CF on most teams (Cowser) LHP's who can negate opposing LH power hitters (bullpen has a good set of LHP's) RHB's who don't need to hit HR to be productive and/or with opposite field power (Westburg and Urias might fit this but Mountcastle not so much) However, I wonder whether we have gone too far in focusing on developing LHB. Now that we traded Norby, we really don't have much RH in the system. This hurts us when matched up against good LHP.    
    • It’s that last bolded part. Mostly.  What they’re showing in that chart is the run value of the actual outcome of each pitch the batter saw in that zone — not the value of “good take” vs. “bad swing,” as you might assume based on the context. So in the the heart of the plate, for example, everyone’s “take” runs are going to be negative, because taking almost assuredly resulted in a strike every time. So every “take” outcome was negative, and they’re adding up that negative run value for each one to get the total damage done by taking pitches in the middle of the plate. For Adley, that was -13 runs of negative value this year.  On the other hand, you get a wide disparity of values from “swings” in the heart of the plate, and that’s basically dependent on how good the hitter is. Because what they’re looking at is the result of the swing — good hitters do tons of damage on pitches down the middle, but bad hitters still make lots of outs on them. The worst hitter in baseball on pitches in the heart of the plate was Maikel “Just Go Ahead and Bunt Three Times” Garcia. He took almost as many of these pitches as Adley, so his takes in the heart of the plate were worth -12 runs. He also sucked something terrible at hitting them, posting a whopping -19 run value when he swung at pitches in the heart zone. The best hitter in baseball on pitches in the heart of the plate (and top 5 in every zone) was…wait for it…Aaron Judge with +41 run value. Though he was much better than league average at swinging at heart pitches, he still took 160 of them (for strikes), so those were worth -11 runs. He destroyed the pitches he swung at, though, to the tune of +52 runs on swings.    It’s the same throughout all the other zones. So for Adley, his takes were a little below average in the “shadow” zone — meaning the pitches he took around the fringes of the plate were called strikes more than they were called balls. And all the called balls he took in the “chase” and “waste” zones were worth a combined total of +40 runs. Swings in the “shadow” zone usually result in negative value, except for your really elite hit tool guys (Witt, Ramirez, Marte, Alvarez, etc). Which makes sense, because it’s really the so-called “pitcher’s pitch” area. Adley was -14 runs of value added on his swing here, which is not great but not really horrible either.  The last two zones are pretty simple — taking pitches will result in a ball, so all of those are good outcomes. Swinging at them pretty much inevitably will result in a strike or an out, so they’re almost all bad outcomes. Adley was comparatively good in this area, with the value of his ability to lay off bad pitches far outweighing the damage done when he did chase.    In the end, it sort of tells us the same story that we already knew from watching him. He’s pretty good at laying off bad pitches, although he expanded the zone a lot more this year than last (which didn’t seem to work out). He also just inexplicably took tons of good strikes in the heart of the plate (which definitely didn’t work out). Swinging at more bad pitches and less good pitches is certainly part of the recipe for the disastrous 2nd half, I think.
    • Also noting an market move away from long-term SP commitments...  2023-24 off-season saw some FA SP difficulties landing their hoped-for deals 
    • On #10, I think we may experiment with trying Akin as a starter again.  If he were to add a sinker and improve his change-up (a la Chris Sale last year), we may have something.
    • Given an aversion to a long-term commitment to SPs, is there an appetite for an ultra-high AAV on a short term contract? Would a Cole or Snell take a 2 year for $(fill in extravagant amount) deal?  Add some options/hedges as needed.
    • On #7, you would obviously love to lock up Gunnar and Westburg but that’s going to be extremely difficult with Boras. I wouldn’t mind extending Eflin.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...