Jump to content

Eovaldi vs Bassitt


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MarCakes21 said:

So has every pitcher into their 30s.  Look at Kershaw.

Eovaldi is a power pitcher whose best pitch, by far, is his 4 seam FB. Kershaw has "matured" into being a crafty lefty who best pitches are his breaking ball and CH. I see a substantial difference in their style of pitching such that Eovaldi losing velocity is a bit more impactful than Kershaw losing velocity. But that's my opinion. Perhaps its a bit more nuanced than yours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tabletop said:

I’m not saying to spend it poorly. I’m saying they should spend it on difference making talent. Guys that are expected to put up 5+ WAR in a full season. Guys that if they stay healthy are difference makers. They could sign Verlander and deGrom if they wanted to and their payroll still wouldn’t be anything crazy. Depending on contract length they could both be off the books before any of the prospects start making more than a couple million.

 

I’m not going to disagree with you but there is plenty of reason to not to want to sign those guys too.  I’ll be curious as to what the contracts will be that they get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

How high are you willing to go? We have to outbid every other team and they still have to say yes. I have a hard time seeing either happening.

Never know.  We can afford to outbid other teams for someone like Rodon.   He’s projected by some to get 5 /120 or more.  Does he turn down 5/150 or 6/180?

Now, everyone will say that’s too much, too long, or both.   However, if you want to play with the big boys that’s what you need to do.   
 

There is tremendous risk but he turns 30 next month, was worth 4.9 fwar in 2021 and 6.2 fwar in 2022.   That’s a contract that should not weigh the team down in the short term.  Either you want to be a major player in FA or you don’t.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don’t see us signing FA SPs that won’t pass our physical, require big time deals, and draft picks to boot.  Elias is a different GM, but how did Ubaldo, Gallardo, Cashner, and Cobb work out?

I think Elias plays this low risk. Signs one of Kluber, Clevinger, or Lyles, to a one year deal, then re-evaluates at the deadline. Our 2nd/3rd/4th tier bats are too undervalued to give away in a trade right now. We need a bat like Abreu. We can piece together the rotation with GR, Bradish, Kremer, Wells, and Voth, while figuring out what we have in Hall, and if Means can come back. I think that puts us in the WC hunt, with the chance to go big at the deadline, once our other bats pop off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Never know.  We can afford to outbid other teams for someone like Rodon.   He’s projected by some to get 5 /120 or more.  Does he turn down 5/150 or 6/180?

Now, everyone will say that’s too much, too long, or both.   However, if you want to play with the big boys that’s what you need to do.   
 

There is tremendous risk but he turns 30 next month, was worth 4.9 fwar in 2021 and 6.2 fwar in 2022.   That’s a contract that should not weigh the team down in the short term.  Either you want to be a major player in FA or you don’t.  
 

How many innings would you expect Rodon to throw over a 5 year contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

150 for 4 of the years and less than 50 for a year

So, 650 or so?

In his 8 seasons as a ML pitcher, he has just under 850 innings.  Never had a 5 year stretch anywhere close to even close to 600 innings.

So basically, you are saying that a guy, who will be in his 30s for the entirety of his contract, will be healthier in his 30s vs his 20s?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

How many innings would you expect Rodon to throw over a 5 year contract?

600-750.  Sure, you can use the two years missed to TJ or you can hope he doesn’t require TJ again in the next 5 years.  Take out those two years and he has 800 IP over 6 years and 300 over the last two.  We can play this game with any pitcher.   Who knew Verlander would break down.   Bassitt is going to be 34 and pitched over 160 innings for the FIRST time in his career at 33.   How do we know that career high 181 innings last year isn’t going to lead to TJ this year and basically make a 3 year contract worthless?

There is risk with EVERY pitcher.  Rodon made every start last year. He’s not the same pitcher he was early in his career.  The last two years show that.  If you can’t take this kind of risk this year then there never will be a time.  We won’t outbid teams for the Gerritt Cole types.   There’s enough doubt surrounding Rodon for the Orioles to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, quality pitches win against quality hitters.  The level of competition rises in the playoffs, so it’s wise to have quality players for a playoff run.  
If we think we’re a playoff worthy team, then we need quality pitching too.  The bar is higher.  And so is the cost and risk.  Investing style would be high growth industries.

If we think we’re on the road to being a playoff team, then the bar isn’t as high.  The cost and risk can be lower.  Investing style would be diversified dividends or battered companies with a turnaround story.

I think we’re a playoff caliber team.  I’m ok throwing a ton of money at a top tier SP.  Verlander, deGrom, and Rodon all have a better skill set than our current #1 SP and be better than many playoff caliber opposing #1 SP.  Yes, that’s a lot of money/risk on one arm.  But investing in proven winners is easier than catching a falling knife.  I favor the short term AAV of Verlander or deGrom.  I’m not opposed to a longer 5 year deal with Rodon (even working in a player or appropriate team option).

Bassitt, Eovaldi and a few other would also be our #1 but would not be definitively better than opposing #1 SPs.  Our playoff odds would improve but the chances of making a run in the playoffs wouldn’t change much. More likely it would depend on Grayson’s development.  And likely not targeting 2023 to really compete for the WS.

I’m just grateful this is even a topic of conversation vs. sifting for diamonds in the rough.  Bring on 2023!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitchers equal risk. Pick your poison. Whoever the Orioles sign, cross your fingers. I hope Sig and group are as astute at long range health projections as they are at other analytical analysis. I doubt they are but that may be the next frontier. Just get us one or two and so we can worry. Let's also hope John Means post TJ is equal to or better than pre TJ. That's potentially bonus time!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

600-750.  Sure, you can use the two years missed to TJ or you can hope he doesn’t require TJ again in the next 5 years.  Take out those two years and he has 800 IP over 6 years and 300 over the last two.  We can play this game with any pitcher.   Who knew Verlander would break down.   Bassitt is going to be 34 and pitched over 160 innings for the FIRST time in his career at 33.   How do we know that career high 181 innings last year isn’t going to lead to TJ this year and basically make a 3 year contract worthless?

There is risk with EVERY pitcher.  Rodon made every start last year. He’s not the same pitcher he was early in his career.  The last two years show that.  If you can’t take this kind of risk this year then there never will be a time.  We won’t outbid teams for the Gerritt Cole types.   There’s enough doubt surrounding Rodon for the Orioles to get him.

Rodon underwent TJS during the 2019 season and returned during the 2020 season. In the bookend years before and after season directly affected by the surgery, 2018 and 2021, he missed over 1/3 of his starts and 1/4 of his starts respectively. And in 2017, he missed almost 2/3 of his starts.

You can't blame it all on one injury, the guy is simply brittle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to evaluating which pitcher(s) to chase, the great unknown is whether the O’s staff thinks there are things that they can improve.   You could have two pitchers with roughly equal past performance, but the staff thinks one can be improved a lot with a few tweaks and they don’t see much room for improvement with the other.   There’s no way for us to know that.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...