Jump to content

2022-23 free agent signings tracker


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Under 5 million, but Corey Dickerson has taken a Nationals job, trying to keep his career alive.

Its to the point in the FA Market now where Trey should be soon, or its likely tough news if he stays teamless.     I don't think the Yankees have really filled the role Benintendi vacated, and the Astros did use him some in the OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang.     It isn't that I foresee the Peak Adley Teams having trouble getting better than the Twins, but this is a setback chasing 6th in 2023, apart from the fact this would have been a dream of a deal as long as his leg holds together.     You can't acquire top talent without accepting risk, at least not once you branch out of the kiddie pool of "building through the draft", which can only get you so far.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Dang.     It isn't that I foresee the Peak Adley Teams having trouble getting better than the Twins, but this is a setback chasing 6th in 2023, apart from the fact this would have been a dream of a deal as long as his leg holds together.     You can't acquire top talent without accepting risk, at least not once you branch out of the kiddie pool of "building through the draft", which can only get you so far.

 

Far be it from me to cry over a guy who just banked $200m, but the last few weeks have been a train wreck for Correa...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Mixed feelings on that one.  Gibson is more reliable to stay healthy and help anchor a rotation; Cueto is the better pitcher if he’s healthy.

 

True, but sometimes you have to take on risk for a better upside. At this point, I would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I would have taken Cueto on that deal over the Gibson deal.

Assuming he would have signed here for that and didn't want to live in Miami and save on taxes, maybe so, but it's close.   Not enough of a difference for me to worry about, frankly.  A lot of folks here seem to be upset about signing Gibson.  I don't get it, as I think he was a good signing.  Fills a need and wasn't an overpay.  I wanted a guy like Rodon that would be an ace for us.  Still do.  But that isn't what the Gibson signing was about.  It's separate, IMO.  Gibson's in the group of guys that were available in that price range that would give us innings and potentially be an improvement on what Lyles gave us.  Just a matter of which one to go with, IMO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2023 at 1:00 PM, Just Regular said:

Dang.     It isn't that I foresee the Peak Adley Teams having trouble getting better than the Twins, but this is a setback chasing 6th in 2023, apart from the fact this would have been a dream of a deal as long as his leg holds together.

On the wild card front, the Angels, Rangers, Twins, and Jays all had strong offseasons. Too bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...