Jump to content

Ryan Mountcastle 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Mountcastle has been lucky he is at one of the few positions without a highly rated prospect at AAA. But the clock is ticking. A full time O'Hearn or Lewin Diaz would have had a decent chance of outplaying him this year so far. And with Cowser's presence likely to push the Santander at 1b experiment further...

I like Ryan and I hope he figures it out but his odds of being part of the next few years' core started out this year meh and have been declining. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Mountcastle was spoiled in a way by batting in premium positions in the lineup with no threat of losing his spot/job. Over 162, players have to constantly adjust. Mountcastle is getting phased out and needs to earn his PT. 

Mounty is a very likeable guy that is really fun to watch, especially when he is locked in....but you are 100% correct.  He's basically said himself that he won't adjust and be more patient, which is really frustrating.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, yark14 said:

Mounty is a very likeable guy that is really fun to watch, especially when he is locked in....but you are 100% correct.  He's basically said himself that he won't adjust and be more patient, which is really frustrating.

I missed where he said that, but if that's accurate, then that's really troubling.

If he doesn't understand that his value is limited because he swings at everything and currently has an on base percentage of .273, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the shed.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Mountcastle but a .565 OPS against RHP, at 1B no less, isnt getting it done. He's in serious danger of losing playing time with those numbers. Soon Westburg and Cowser will force the issue to where Mountcastle's struggles are too much to ignore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spy Fox said:

Mountcastle has been lucky he is at one of the few positions without a highly rated prospect at AAA. But the clock is ticking. A full time O'Hearn or Lewin Diaz would have had a decent chance of outplaying him this year so far. And with Cowser's presence likely to push the Santander at 1b experiment further...

I like Ryan and I hope he figures it out but his odds of being part of the next few years' core started out this year meh and have been declining. 

O'Hearn is 29 and has over 1,000 PA in the bigs with a career OPS of .691. Aside from the 170 PA in his rookie year in 2018 and the 54 PA for the O's this year, he's never brought any value with the bat. He strikes me as a pretty classic Quad-A player who will get exposed (again) if you give him a starting role. Diaz is 26 and has a career .567 OPS in 343 PA. He's playing well in Norfolk, but this has also been his best season ever in the minors. Maaaybe one of them can outperform Mounty against RHP over the rest of the year in an expanded role, but I'd hate to be counting on it. Continuing the Santander experiment is probably the better option (in house). Or Westburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I missed where he said that, but if that's accurate, then that's really troubling.

If he doesn't understand that his value is limited because he swings at everything and currently has an on base percentage of .273, maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the shed.  

Not sure if this is what they are referring to, but there is a story where Buck confronted Mountcastle in spring training about his lack of walks in the minors and Mountcastle just laughed. The one thing he was told to work on, he didn't change at all. They ended up holding him in AAA that entire year. 

https://www.camdenchat.com/2019/6/27/18760947/baltimore-orioles-ryan-mountcastle-time 

“I said, ‘I noticed last year the whole season you walked 17 times. What was that all about?’” Showalter said. “He starts laughing and I said, ‘Understand, it’s not funny. This won’t work.’

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Not sure if this is what they are referring to, but there is a story where Buck confronted Mountcastle in spring training about his lack of walks in the minors and Mountcastle just laughed. The one thing he was told to work on, he didn't change at all. They ended up holding him in AAA that entire year. 

https://www.camdenchat.com/2019/6/27/18760947/baltimore-orioles-ryan-mountcastle-time 

“I said, ‘I noticed last year the whole season you walked 17 times. What was that all about?’” Showalter said. “He starts laughing and I said, ‘Understand, it’s not funny. This won’t work.’

I forgot all about that.  

That's annoying.  I don't think Mountcastle is dumb...I mean, figuring out that walks are a good thing shouldn't be hard to understand.

So either he knows he could be a better hitter and help the team more by not flailing away and he continues to do so because he runs into one every once in awhile...or, he really can't control himself from swinging at bad pitches.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, yark14 said:

Mounty is a very likeable guy that is really fun to watch, especially when he is locked in....but you are 100% correct.  He's basically said himself that he won't adjust and be more patient, which is really frustrating.

When Mountcastle is locked in he hits the ball better than anyone else on the Orioles. The problem is most of the time Mountcastle is not locked in and he's becoming a worse hitter every season with a declining OPS+ since his rookie season.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I forgot all about that.  

That's annoying.  I don't think Mountcastle is dumb...I mean, figuring out that walks are a good thing shouldn't be hard to understand.

So either he knows he could be a better hitter and help the team more by not flailing away and he continues to do so because he runs into one every once in awhile...or, he really can't control himself from swinging at bad pitches.

 

He's been the only one of the young vets- Hays, Santander, Mateo all spring to mind- who hasn't show any improvement in approach.  Santander has almost completely turned his approach around.  Hays and Mateo still fall into bad habits- obviously especially Mateo- but you can see them struggling against them.

Mountcastle just keeps doing what he's always done.  He's probably our most naturally gifted hitter, but that gift in many ways has become a curse.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...