Jump to content

BP Write-Up on Santander


Pickles

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

So Baseball Prospectus has a new article today entitled "The Most Interesting Players in the AL East."  The choice for the Orioles was Santander.

Link for subscribers but it is behind a paywall.

https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/80005/the-most-interesting-players-in-the-al-east/

Here are the most relevant parts of Santander's write up:

Able to put together a healthy season for the first time in his career, Santander made good on the promise he had flashed in parts of prior seasons by smashing 33 home runs—tied for fourth most in the AL.The natural question to ask after such a thunderous coming out party is “can he do it again?”

The answer here is a resounding “yes”. That was no fluke season

And here is their reasoning:

Just look at the only other hitters with sub-20% strikeouts, sub-40% groundballs, and a .200+ isolated slugging:

Santander.png

That’s, uh, some pretty good company. 2023 will be about whether Santander can keep it.

 

Pretty positive and encouraging take on Santander.  But basically he does what hitters are being taught to do: Make contact, hit the ball hard, and elevate it.

 

 

 

Thanks for sharing! Managing his health is probably the biggest issue. I'm in favor of gradually transitioning him to the primary DH role (+/- 70 starts) and limiting his RF role (+/- 80 starts), letting Stowers see the field in the other 80 or so RF starts.

Edited by ThisIsBirdland
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Thanks for sharing! Managing his health is probably the biggest issue. I'm in favor of gradually transitioning him to the primary DH role (+/- 70 starts) and limiting his RF role (+/- 80 starts), letting Stowers see the field in the other 80 or so RF starts.

I mean that seems very reasonable to me.

I know there was a lot of chatter that Santander had gotten himself into the best shape of his life last offseason, and he has spend the time working specifically on flexibility and range of motion, but I'll be honest: He moved noticeably worse last season than in years prior.  It is what it is: He's  big dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I mean that seems very reasonable to me.

I know there was a lot of chatter that Santander had gotten himself into the best shape of his life last offseason, and he has spend the time working specifically on flexibility and range of motion, but I'll be honest: He moved noticeably worse last season than in years prior.  It is what it is: He's  big dude.

I'm still of the opinion that his '21 ankle injury may have carried over into '22. He just did not move well in the OF or on the bases. Ankles are tricky, and sometimes they never heal fully (from someone who broke their ankle at 18 and still has trouble with it 20 years later). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CharmCityHokie said:

I'm still of the opinion that his '21 ankle injury may have carried over into '22. He just did not move well in the OF or on the bases. Ankles are tricky, and sometimes they never heal fully (from someone who broke their ankle at 18 and still has trouble with it 20 years later). 

I just remember them mentioning on the broadcast the regime Santander had put himself through last offseason several times, and how he had worked very hard to improve his flexibility and speed, and thinking to myself he's still moving the worst I've ever seen him and it's not like he's old.

Whatever it is, age or ankle or just physical growth, he shouldn't be counted on to be an everyday outfielder, but with the way his bat is developing, he doesn't need to be to be a solid contributor.

Edited by Pickles
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

That’s good information. But I don’t find Santander particularly interesting. Quite the opposite, actually. 

He has decent upside at the plate. His OBP has always been an issue but the biggest issue with him has always been availability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...