Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

It might be time to invest in a sports psychologist. 

The moment was just too big for him and he couldn't self-correct.

It was really painful to watch.

Multi-million dollar arm.....

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

Grayson was solid the whole second half and has good control so getting knocked out in the 2nd inning and giving up 4 walks certainly seems to suggest that yesterday was very uncharacteristic for him.  So, how can we explain it?   The long layoff?   Just a coincidence to have his worst game of the year yesterday?   Too hyped up or nervous and couldn’t get it together enough to settle down?   I don’t really know but the last one is my best guess for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Grayson was solid the whole second half and has good control so getting knocked out in the 2nd inning and giving up 4 walks certainly seems to suggest that yesterday was very uncharacteristic for him.  So, how can we explain it?   The long layoff?   Just a coincidence to have his worst game of the year yesterday?   Too hyped up or nervous and couldn’t get it together enough to settle down?   I don’t really know but the last one is my best guess for now.

Does it need to be explained other than "he just didn't have his best stuff?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

It's just BS. You don't get to MLB and have moments that are too big for you. He just had a bad day. That happens.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They made him throw strikes yesterday, which was a challenge for him with the lack of command. That’s all. I have every confidence in him being the star that they (and we) believe him to be headed towards.

I posted that I thought Texas was a better matchup for Means than GrayRod yesterday. Perhaps if Meansy doesn’t experience the elbow soreness he gets the ball yesterday instead. I guess we will never truly know because you know that management won’t come out and say it if it’s true.

The kid threw a clunker. It was evident from the first batter that he didn’t have his command yesterday. I blame Hyde for leaving him in when everyone in the stadium knew that he was struggling to find the strike zone and didn’t seem to completely trust his stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, banks703 said:

The kid threw a clunker. It was evident from the first batter that he didn’t have his command yesterday. I blame Hyde for leaving him in when everyone in the stadium knew that he was struggling to find the strike zone and didn’t seem to completely trust his stuff. 

When would you have taken him out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed like a bad omen when Grayson got to two strikes on Semien in the first AB of the game, only to surrender a soft single (EV 68) to LF. He got to two strikes on every batter in the first inning but allowed the single and the walks to Seager and Carter (who, granted, benefited from an egregious call on 3-and-2).

He continued to look like pre-demotion Grayson when he got to 2-and-2 on Lowe before walking him with two four-seam fastballs that missed inside. He had two strikes on Taveras (two-run double on a 1-and-2 four-seam fastball), Seager (BB on a 3-and-2 four-seam fastball), Garver (swinging-bunt RBI single on an 0-and-2 changeup), and Heim (RBI single on an 0-and-2 four-seam fastball) before he was lifted.

As in his April and May struggles, he was not putting hitters away. I don't know if it was pitch selection or something else, but it was an inopportune time to revert to his early form. Hoping he gets a chance to redeem himself out of the bullpen in a Game 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He laid an egg.     

One of the things I'll wonder is if more experience would have helped.     In the aggregate, Elias' decisions have of course been great.

The Club will have control of Grayson's 2029 season, which probably will be very valuable.

The 2022 team was not supposed to win, and that year Grayson's talent was conserved and/or polished while Watkins/Voth/Zimmermann made 50 starts.

His ability to render championship caliber performance yesterday might have been greater if he had more MLB seasoning.

Backs to the wall, but still a small chance he'll get to try again on Friday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

What gave it away?  Seems everyone here can tell that "the moment was too big for him."

Okay, fine.  I disagree, but I'd like it if people could clue me in on what it is that made it so obvious that "the moment was too big for him."

Is the moment "too big" for anyone that doesn't perform in a high stakes moment?

The moment was too big for Kershaw the other day.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Baseball is a funny game sometimes, but you're right, we are going to battle with starters that were not even projected for the opening day rotation. Yet, here we are. Obviously anytime we have a series against the Yankees it's big, but even if we lose 2 of 3, we'd only be 2.5 games back.  The loss of Coulombe is huge and that bothers me more than the starters honestly. Perez, Akin, Baker and Tate filling key roles if Cano or Kimbrel is not available does not make me feel great. Baker threw the ball in his debut back and has been throwing well in AAA for a bit, so maybe he's a little bit of lightning in a bottle that this team needs in the pen.   
    • Count me in, but the Orioles have never really subscribed to that theory of splitting time like that. They really put an emphasis on everyday players and bench players with everyday players rarely getting days off.
    • I agree with this. I just feel like he hasn't been given a fair shot in two seasons up here. I can't see any reason that he can't start 4 games out of 7. Give Hays, Mullins, Santander and Cowser each one day off a week and let him start. 
    • This is probably obvious to many but I have not seen it talked about. With Bradish going on the IL and the recall of reliever Vespi they are now in a 5 man rotation.    Burnes, GRod, Irvin, Suarez and Povich.    And an 8 man pen. It was hoped that Kremer would join the rotation but his short 3 2/3 innings in Sunday's start at Norfolk probably means he gets another start in Norfolk on Friday.    If he does well at that point he could join the O's on June 26th.    Until then the O's are likely to continue with a 5 man rotation IMO.   Even if Kremer joins the rotation in June the O's probably go back to a 5 man rotation in July because of the number of off days in July.
    • Some may feel that way, but I'm wishing that they would have landed them both. Even before the injuries the starting pitching was going to be a little light next season... it's possibly going to be brutal now. Either way, I'm going to enjoy 24 before worrying about next season.
    • That barrel% regression is really surprising. I haven't looked into his repertoire or to see if there is some difference in how he's pitching, but that's a crazy drop off.  I wanted him and was willing to give up Westburg for him before the Burnes trade. I'm glad I'm not the Orioles GM now! lol Saying that, I do think the Orioles may have gotten a bit better out of him. Plus, out of those last seven starts, he's really only pitched poorly twice including the last game where he allowed seven runs to balloon his ERA.  With all the injuries we've head, I still wouldn't be upset with him in the rotation now. But if Suarez can keep it up and start getting through 6 more often, he's basically what we had hoped Cease would have been for us.
    • You've never really been a Stowers guy and have always put a huge emphasis on K-BB ratio. While I agree that K-BB ratio can be important, I believe you had misgivings with Mountcastle as he moved up the chain for the same reason. Stowers is always going to have a lot of miss, but he's not getting much regular playing time and pinch-hitting against relievers is not normally a time to work pitchers so I'm not surprised he's been more aggressive. I still think if Stowers was given 500 PAs he's going to hit 25-30 bombs and put up an OPS north of .780. And I think he's improved his defense enough that I would feel ok with him in LF in Camden Yards.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...