Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, banks703 said:

If we look at how much Gunnar has improved at SS this year, playing half of the season as a 21 year old, playing half of the season as a 3B, it's pretty remarkable that he has progressed as much as he has. Prior to the season I had both of Joey and Jorge ahead of Gunnar as a defender but I think that he's right there with both of those guys and I would probably put him ahead of Jorge.

Gunnar (8 DRS) currently ranks 7th while having played only 432 innings at SS this year. The guys that are ahead of him:

Franco 948 innings (17 DRS)

Swanson 1046 innings (15 DRS)

Volpe 1127 innings (14 DRS)

Rojas 782 innings (11 DRS)

Lindor 1132 innings 11 (DRS)

Tovar 1099 innings (9 DRS)

Gunnar's DRS pace (had he played equal innings to Lindor this year) would be 21.. he would be four DRS better than Wander Franco. 

UZR and OAA both have Gunnar at exactly 0, which I find strange but not completely unexpected because of how they're measured. For reference, Jorge's OAA is at 2 but I don't think he's played that well there. I don't think he's played as well as Gunnar at SS this year. 

Again, what I have been stating about Holliday and Gunnar and the rest of the SS in the system is that Holliday is not going to be the best defensive option at the position.

 

He doesn’t have to be the best defensive option to be the one who gets the job.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Today's Rangers with Seager and Semien maybe resemble how the Orioles will look assuming

 

 

I've stated multiple times that I see the combo of Gunnar and Holliday being comparable to Seager and Semien. I think this is what the O's have in Gunnar and Holliday for about $500 million cheaper than what the Rangers pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

He doesn’t have to be the best defensive option to be the one who gets the job.

 

Buddy, this is just not a sensible argument. We're now disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing.

We'll see where things are in two years when Gunnar has a gold glove and a silver slugger award. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, banks703 said:

Buddy, this is just not a sensible argument. We're now disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing.

We'll see where things are in two years when Gunnar has a gold glove and a silver slugger award. 

Im not now nor will I ever be your buddy.

Third base matters in this discussion as well.

If the Os do not have an above average, very good defensive third baseman (not sure Mayo qualifies as that), the choice very well could be have an elite GG level third baseman and a very good SS vs a very good SS and and average or so third baseman.

Ortiz could factor into this as well…or he could be traded or the Os may want him at second. The FG article that you love to quote now also threw some shade at Ortiz at SS.

All of this is to say that there is a lot to be decided here and what happens at second, third and the trade market will factor into what happens at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are we determining this? By what some guy wrote about him in an article a few pages back? In case anyone forgot, Gunnar was rated as a 50 fielder, even last season, when he was a prospect. Holliday is rated as a 55 fielder right now. They are both rated the same speed and Gunnar has a 65 arm vs. the more than adequate 55 that Holliday is rated at. 

We have to believe these people, right? It's what they do for a living, as was suggested earlier.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Im not now nor will I ever be your buddy.

Third base matters in this discussion as well.

If the Os do not have an above average, very good defensive third baseman (not sure Mayo qualifies as that), the choice very well could be have an elite GG level third baseman and a very good SS vs a very good SS and and average or so third baseman.

Ortiz could factor into this as well…or he could be traded or the Os may want him at second. The FG article that you love to quote now also threw some shade at Ortiz at SS.

All of this is to say that there is a lot to be decided here and what happens at second, third and the trade market will factor into what happens at SS.

I quoted the fangraphs article once. I'd hardly define that as loving to quote it but alright. 

You should google the term ad hominem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Malike said:

How are we determining this? By what some guy wrote about him in an article a few pages back? In case anyone forgot, Gunnar was rated as a 50 fielder, even last season, when he was a prospect. Holliday is rated as a 55 fielder right now. They are both rated the same speed and Gunnar has a 65 arm vs. the more than adequate 55 that Holliday is rated at. 

We have to believe these people, right? It's what they do for a living, as was suggested earlier.

No we are supposed to believe some guy who is kind of part of the scouting community and can no longer dunk a basketball because he’s 38 and only 5’9”.  I mean, if that’s not the resume of someone better than those guys, I don’t know what is.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

No we are supposed to believe some guy who is kind of part of the scouting community and can no longer dunk a basketball because he’s 38 and only 5’9”.  I mean, if that’s not the resume of someone better than those guys, I don’t know what is.

But, but, the scouting community has rated Holliday a 55 fielder vs. a 50 for Gunnar. This is some metaverse-type crap, I guess, where lower is better? Or, maybe the scouts are only infallible when it proves someone's point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No we are supposed to believe some guy who is kind of part of the scouting community and can no longer dunk a basketball because he’s 38 and only 5’9”.  I mean, if that’s not the resume of someone better than those guys, I don’t know what is.

Again, Google ad hominem. It may help you understand more of yourself.

I wonder who hurt you. 
 

I extended a ban-bet to you which you conveniently passed over. You’re so confident in what you think you know, take it. One of us will be right, the other will leave the board.

Your routine of personally attacking people when they disagree with you is tired, good buddy. Take the ban-bet. 

Edited by banks703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

But, but, the scouting community has rated Holliday a 55 fielder vs. a 50 for Gunnar. This is some metaverse-type crap, I guess, where lower is better? Or, maybe the scouts are only infallible when it proves someone's point?

I actually have no doubt that Gunnar has superior skills to Holliday. Gunnar has superior skills to almost anyone. He’s that talented.

But that doesn’t mean he will be the SS at the end of all of this. Just so many factors involved and yes, one of those factors is Holliday putting in the work to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I actually have no doubt that Gunnar has superior skills to Holliday. Gunnar has superior skills to almost anyone. He’s that talented.

But that doesn’t mean he will be the SS at the end of all of this. Just so many factors involved and yes, one of those factors is Holliday putting in the work to get better.

If we're going off scout grades, Holliday grades out a 70 overall. That usually doesn't suggest a ploddingly slow baserunner or iron glove defender. We'll see. To suggest Holliday isn't athletic or fast is seriously pretty funny, though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

If we're going off scout grades, Holliday grades out a 70 overall. That usually doesn't suggest a ploddingly slow baserunner or iron glove defender. We'll see. To suggest Holliday isn't athletic or fast is seriously pretty funny, though.

No one has ever suggested that he isn’t fast or athletic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I actually have no doubt that Gunnar has superior skills to Holliday. Gunnar has superior skills to almost anyone. He’s that talented.

But that doesn’t mean he will be the SS at the end of all of this. Just so many factors involved and yes, one of those factors is Holliday putting in the work to get better.

And the back pedaling begins. 
 

Two years from now I’m sure you’ll reference how you always thought that Gunnar would stick at SS and you’ll cite this post, right? 
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, banks703 said:

And the back pedaling begins. 
 

Two years from now I’m sure you’ll reference how you always thought that Gunnar would stick at SS and you’ll cite this post, right? 
 

 

I’m not backpedaling at all. I fully expect Holliday to be there. I think he puts in the work needed because him being a SS is how he maxes out his value. But he still has to do it.

Maybe he gets complacent and lazy? I can’t predict that but I don’t think that will be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...