Jump to content

Has Gunnar's struggles slowed the promotion of other O's prospects?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The club has major and obvious needs right now and have all season, despite the winning, and they still aren’t getting their chances. 

The winning kind of proves your premise false.

Edited by Pickles
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Numbers were a couple weeks old.  Maybe the guy on the video got his stats from somewhere else, but they are very good analysts on prospects and I listen to them a lot.  I seriously doubt Gunnar is hitting offspeed to an .800 OPS after struggling so mighty early in the year.  Will have to look into it more because he has really struggled at "hitting" and has only been saved by his ability to draw walks.

I mean...you can doubt it, but Baseball Savant is a pretty authoritative source. He isn't being "saved" by walks on offspeed stuff, he's legitimately hitting those pitches. It's the breaking stuff that he's struggling to make hard contact with.

These are the definitions that Baseball Savant is using for pitch types:

image.png.941a77fffb850920bca5dee25d498113.png

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

What pitches are included in "breaking" pitches?  I assume curveball, slider, forkball.  I'm sure I'm missing others.  Listening to this video, it was educational how much young hitters struggle against a good slider.  Some experienced hitters never learn to hit a good slider (Jones and Mountcastle are prime examples).  I'm sure a major key to hitting sliders is laying off sliders outside the zone. 

That was the most difficult adjustment for me from HS to college-huge difference in speed/break/recognition and that was pretty much the end of my college career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Pickles said:

The winning kind of proves your premise false.

That’s actually complete bs. You have zero idea if they would be doing better..or have more margin for error long term. 

Now, they could be worse too..who knows but that’s the point.

They would unquestionably be more talented and have a higher ceiling overall.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I didn't know the Greeks played baseball.  I look at OPS and ERA relative to everyone else.  

Is there some trig function I'm missing?

Are you actually ignorant of the term as it is used in baseball?

Also:

276px-Hellinikon_Stadium.jpg

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s a shame people on this site put so much value in SSS.

I also find it funny that people want to blow Elias because of how great he is at building a farm system and then they scoff at the idea that the players they laud can come up here and be helpful…that somehow all of these highly ranked, talented players are actually completely poop and not actually very good.

The “logic” is hysterical and the inconsistency is complete and utter bs.

Except that a lot of the building of a farm system is related to having chips to trade when the big club starts looking like contenders.  Bring up the guys prior to the deadline and they're exposed, go through the usual transitional difficulties, and lose a significant amount of value. 

Perhaps holding these guys down is just timing, to see which are bringing the most interest and might be traded for a SP in late July?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

That’s actually complete bs. You have zero idea if they would be doing better..or have more margin for error long term. 

Now, they could be worse too..who knows but that’s the point.

They would unquestionably be more talented and have a higher ceiling overall.

 

Maybe it's semantics but what "major and obvious" holes does this club have that are easily resolved internally?

The biggest "holes" on the roster are 1b performance and SP pitching and BP depth.

We tried to upgrade our starting staff with our own prospects.  That didn't go well.

Grayson certainly has more talent and a higher ceiling than our other pitchers, but he performed worse.  That's because performance, and thus winning and losing, are not dependent on solely talent and ceiling.

In most other organizations, Westburg and Ortiz would probably be in the big leagues.  But that's not the point.  As long as this team is on pace to win 100+ games, and Frazier, Mateo, and Urias are performing like above average regulars, then they're not going to be replaced.

It will take an injury.  And for Ortiz that already happened.  He hasn't played since he was sent down, no?  There might be something there and he might be here instead of Vavra if not.  The same is true of Cowser.  If he was healthy, it might be different.

I feel bad for Westburg I guess, but take everything I just said about Ortiz and add another impediment, Ortiz himself.

They're on pace to win 100+ games.  Why don't you try enjoying that instead of subjecting us to how much better you could be doing it? ;) 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, justD said:

Except that a lot of the building of a farm system is related to having chips to trade when the big club starts looking like contenders.  Bring up the guys prior to the deadline and they're exposed, go through the usual transitional difficulties, and lose a significant amount of value. 

Perhaps holding these guys down is just timing, to see which are bringing the most interest and might be traded for a SP in late July?

I don't buy that narrative.

Westburg's trade value isn't going to be appreciably different if he goes 5-20 with four strikeouts or 2-20 with seven.

Other teams already have their evaluations, a bit of ML service time isn't going to do much to change it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, waroriole said:

No it doesn’t. Teams can have obvious weaknesses and be good overall. 

I mean, sure, but the same question then as I asked SG:

What are the "major" and "obvious" "holes" than can be easily rectified by calling some guys up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't buy that narrative.

Westburg's trade value isn't going to be appreciably different if he goes 5-20 with four strikeouts or 2-20 with seven.

Other teams already have their evaluations, a bit of ML service time isn't going to do much to change it.

Westburg's problem is he isn't on the 40 man.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...