Jump to content

Orioles related trade rumors and speculation leading up to the deadline


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, 2001OriolesFan said:

It is true that having 1-3 top notch pitchers is an advantage in October.  But I think the rules of the game are still the same, then.  Do teams with shut-down pitchers use them in July?

If you think that’s the point, you are missing a lot.

Luckily Elias understands that upgrading the team for an October run is something that needs to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slowly but surely convincing myself that Michael Lorenzen and Steven Matz are going to be helpful additions to this team down the stretch, with Lorenzen taking Wells spot and Matz ready to step in when the next opening is needed.

The Kyle Gibsons/Adam Fraziers of the trade deadline if you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

I’m surprised to not see this being discussed. 
 

 

It's a long shot, but Cease (FA 2026) has been discussed frequently.  If a move was made, I'd expect the return to be valued at something like Cowser and Ortiz.  It's a tough pill to swallow, as we lose 6 years of each, but Cease has ToR stuff and is highly valued around the league.  Maybe a Kjerstad and Norby pairing?  Again, unlikely, but fun to speculate.

Edited by Greg Pappas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2001OriolesFan said:

Well, we could use another starting pitcher or relief pitcher, because we are thin there.  We are flush with good position players and have enough depth to weather some injuries.  The Orioles are 16-9 in July, which is a 0.640 winning percentage.  Only Altlanta is better and NOBODY is even at 0.600.   Why is there this panic about having to make a trade move at any cost?  I think too many people here understand baseball from playing video games or fantacy leagues.

 

Even if you cannot be convinced that a rotation upgrade is necessary (18th in starter ERA), surely you can see that innings limits surrounding our younger SP’s is strictly a numbers game. Idk the science behind it all but this management has seemed to be conservative with building innings and very aware of past workloads. We have had a very healthy rotation and maybe the caution has paid off but correlation isn’t causation. Grayson and Wells are of particular concern here. Does management feel comfortable with Bradish or Kremer going 180? IDK. But Irvin sucks and Means isn’t in a position where he should be relied on. We need a body or two to carry the load. 

Edited by Matt Bennett
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ArtVanDelay said:

Is a 4.00 ERA bad?  He has a 111 career ERA+.  He’d be our best or second best starter. 

It's not bad at all, but we'd be paying for a 2.95 ERA pitcher (who's really a 4.00 ERA pitcher). I don't buy the fact that a player who's pitched in the league for nearly 10 years and has a career 4.05 ERA is suddenly a Cy Young caliber pitcher at age 30. E-Rod's a perfectly fine rotation piece, but only if the price is right. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Greg Pappas said:

It's a long shot, but Cease (FA 2026) has been discussed frequently.  If a move was made, I'd expect the return to be valued at something like Cowser and Ortiz.  It's a tough pill to swallow, as we lose 6 years of each, but Cease has ToR stuff and is highly valued around the league.  Maybe a Kjerstad and Norby pairing?  Again, unlikely, but fun to speculate.

Pass... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Slowly but surely convincing myself that Michael Lorenzen and Steven Matz are going to be helpful additions to this team down the stretch, with Lorenzen taking Wells spot and Matz ready to step in when the next opening is needed.

The Kyle Gibsons/Adam Fraziers of the trade deadline if you will.

 Michael Lorenzen would not be the two way player I wanted 😛

Edited by Orioles0615
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Slowly but surely convincing myself that Michael Lorenzen and Steven Matz are going to be helpful additions to this team down the stretch, with Lorenzen taking Wells spot and Matz ready to step in when the next opening is needed.

The Kyle Gibsons/Adam Fraziers of the trade deadline if you will.

I didn’t/don’t really want Lorenzen but if you can get him for very little, it’s probably a move to make because you do need innings. My thing is, get him but also get a better starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every available pitcher has some warts.  If I am giving up a top 3-5 prospect, I want a wart free pitcher. Someone who gets past 6 innings regularly and at times through 7.  Even Verlander only went 5.1 yesterday.. don't know if that could be related to trade possibilities.. but disappointing if not. 

Edited by Fan4Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

It's not bad at all, but we'd be paying for a 2.95 ERA pitcher (who's really a 4.00 ERA pitcher). I don't buy the fact that a player who's pitched in the league for nearly 10 years and has a career 4.05 ERA is suddenly a Cy Young caliber pitcher at age 30. E-Rod's a perfectly fine rotation piece, but only if the price is right. 

You do realize that league wide ERA goes up and down right?  It's not a great thing to use as a tentpole argument.

His ERA+ over his career is 111 and his career FIP is 3.82.

I think folks are judging him more on that 111 than they are his current 148.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fan4Life said:

Every available pitcher has some warts.  If I am giving up a top 3-5 prospect, I want a wart free pitcher. Someone who gets past 6 inning regularly and often times through 7.  Even Verlander only went 5.1 yesterday.. don't know if that could be related to trade possibilities.. but disappointing if not. 

Who, exactly, doesn't have a wart?

What perfect pitcher is worth a top 5! prospect?

Are there even a dozen pitchers in today's game that meet your criteria?  You place a pretty high value on the fifth best prospect in the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You do realize that league wide ERA goes up and down right?  It's not a great thing to use as a tentpole argument.

His ERA+ over his career is 111 and his career FIP is 3.82.

I think folks are judging him more on that 111 than they are his current 148.

It's irrelevant to the point I'm making. Acquiring E-Rod would be a buying high situation. That's very rarely a winning strategy, especially with older players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Who, exactly, doesn't have a wart?

What perfect pitcher is worth a top 5! prospect?

Are there even a dozen pitchers in today's game that meet your criteria?  You place a pretty high value on the fifth best prospect in the system.

Ok lets say top 3 prospects, much higher for a rental.  Verlander took 103 pitches to get through 5.1 innings. You are correct there isn't anyone available that I would give any of our top 3. I watched Hader close yesterday.. he was disappointing to watch as well. But one game likely isn't a good bar to use.

Edited by Fan4Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think if you are going to ignore PED issues, Bonds probably held the title of greatest living ball player long before Willie Mays died.   
    • This times 1000.   A five game losing streak where we’ve lost exactly 1.5 games in the standings, by the way. You would think we were suddenly ten games behind the Yankees (who’s asses we just finished kicking five days ago) with the way people act.    Good time for an OH vacation for me because the flop sweat around here is flooding the place. 
    • I don't know if anyone is questioning if the Orioles will still qualify for the postseason after this recent rough stretch. However, the concern that I am seeing/reading/hearing is that once October begins, we don't have the kind of pitching talent necessary to go deep into the Fall by winning multiple rounds against teams who have better pitching talent. 
    • I believe this is truly the "all in " year...not next year or the year after. After this year, it's conceivable we could lose Burnes, and Santander, and that would mean two of the best and(among) the most important players on the team. No Burnes(he'll command at least 30 million a year and likely more) would maybe give us ONE solid pitcher in Grod, and our outfield will be in flux. No, I think THIS is the year the Orioles have to win, and that means some dramatic, possibly risky trades at the break yield some significant upgrades to our beleaguered pitching both with starters and the pen. If we don't get it this year, we may never have a potential post season team in the next couple of years..not at this rate.
    • Luke Dickerson, SS, Morris Knolls HS, Rockaway, N.J. There are shades of Jackson Merrill and Sammy Stafura with Dickerson as a northeast/mid-atlantic prep shortstop who has received a lot of late helium this spring. He’s an offense-oriented righthanded hitter with a background as a talented hockey player. He might fit better at second base or center field, but teams like his hit/power combination enough to take him inside the first two rounds. He had a solid showing at the draft combine last week, as well. 
    • As the bluejays continue to fade, I cant help but think that they would be a trade fit if they decide to sell.  Specifically Gausman and Berrios. Gausman is under contract for 2 seasons after this one, and Berrios has 4 years with an opt out after 2 years. So you would essentially have both of those guys for 2.5 years which would be a big boost for 2024, and the coming years with Burnes likely gone and Bradish out for 2025. They are both on hefty contracts (for Orioles standards) but with our payroll and new ownership group you would think that wouldnt be a huge problem. Not sure what the asking price would be for one of, or both, of those guys but worth looking into. I know its hard to look at trading within the division, especially what would potentially be a "blockbuster" type of  deal but I just dont see a ton of options on the trade market right now outside of the White Sox, A's and Rockies and none of those teams can match what the bluejays have to offer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...