Jump to content

Do you care what Adam Frazier has to say?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

He was probably worth it just for that 2-strike 2-out double down the left field line to score Mateo from first and tie the game in the bottom of the ninth inning of arguably the biggest and most dramatic win of the year, game 4 in the final Rays series (just watched the game replay a few days ago).

Edited by now
  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, now said:

He was probably worth it just for that 2-strike 2-out double down the left field line to score Mateo from first and tie the game in the bottom of the ninth inning of arguably the biggest and most dramatic win of the year, game 4 in the final Rays series (just watched the game replay a few days ago).

Arguably the loudest moment of the year at Camden Yards.  I was there and it was quite thrilling.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

20 minutes Glenn Clark interview:

https://m.soundcloud.com/glennclarkradioclips/adam-frazier-december-4-2023

He says he hasn’t ruled out that the O’s would want him back “in a different role.”  He certainly didn’t seem to think it was likely.  Said Jackson Holliday “will have a huge impact” and Jordan Westburg “is a really good player.”   

He was one of the players who showed up for the Brooks Robinson memorial service.   Didn’t know that.   
 

Yeah, he can start his coaching career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I care what Frazer thinks?    Yes,  he has been around for a while with Pittsburgh, Seattle before being part of a 101 wins in Baltimore.  He has a perspective that is interesting.

I like his points about why Hyde is such a good manager.   His comment about Holliday was good to hear.    

Glenn kept trying to get him pumped up about the O's being special and Frazier enjoy his time here.  Thinks they are winning group of players, some special moments but overall he wants to be on winning team and says there are other places to win.

He know the chances of returning to the O's are slim.   And he also wants to get paid which is not in the cards with the O's going forward.

Overall a nice interview.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have come to the conclusion that I was wrong and that Frazier was an important piece of a 101 win Oriole team. He had some really big moments. And he handled his changing role pretty well. 
 

I don’t expect him back. But easily see Adam Frazier as a key piece to last years success. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing that most of the people making cracks about not wanting Frazier back next year didn't have the time to listen to the interview, which is one of the best ever of an Oriole. Got a real sense of the gracious personality of someone who resolutely maintained a poker face and cool, clutch mindset throughout the season no matter what the situation. The comments on  Hyde, Brooks, Henderson, the post-season byes, the clubhouse atmosphere, and what it feels like to celebrate after keeping one's feelings under wraps during the long, long climb to the division championship were all revelatory. Thanks to Adam for being an indispensable part of a 101-win season!

Edited by LA2
  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LA2 said:

I'm guessing that most of the people making cracks about not wanting Frazier back next year didn't have the time to listen to the interview, which is one of the best of an Oriole I've ever listened to. Got a real sense of the gracious personality of someone who was so good at maintaining a poker face and cool, clutch mindset throughout the season no matter what the situation. The comments on  Hyde, Brooks, Henderson, the post-season byes, the clubhouse atmosphere, and what it feels like to celebrate after the long haul of keeping one's feelings under wraps during the climb to the division championship were all rich. Thanks to Adam for being an indispensable part of a 101-win season!

Good post, this made me actually click the link.

He was always such a boring and soft-spoken post-game interview, so it's refreshing to hear him open up a bit. He's no Kyle Gibson in terms of listening to a guy talk baseball, but nice to hear him be a little looser. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I have total faith that he will get a SP and a RP, and those will be without trading any of the top 3 prospects. And the only player Kjerstad could go for is Crochet. (I don’t think Skubal will even be available, and even if the Tigers listen on him he won’t be dealt.) What I don’t have total faith in is how good those SP and RP will be. I think the trade deadline is very unpredictable, and Elias is not the type to overpay to get Option A. He’s more likely to get outbid on Option A and pivot to Options B, C or D at better value, and that all has to happen very quickly in a compressed timeframe right before the deadline. So if things don’t break right they easily could end up with some underwhelming guys like last year.
    • Things to consider… We’re sort of pot committed to try and win a WS this year since we have Butnes.  What has more value?  Skubal for 3 postseasons or Holliday for 6?  Give me the SP.  Isn’t it risk adverse to acquire Skubal and have a big 3 rotation to limit having a red hot lineup beat you?  Ala Rangers.  If not Skubal now, we still have to make a big trade in the offseason to replace Burnes. Why not make the trade now and have that SP paired with Burnes?
    • Are they? Wells doesn't throw hard by today's standards, neither does Means.  
    • IMO I see Skubal as helping us much more than Fedde next year.  I’m concerned about this outlier season from Fedde as nothing more than catching lightening in a bottle (especially at his age and with his track record before this season). Also, for all of the concern over Skubal and Crochet’s innings, Fedde has only thrown something like 133 innings as a career high in a single season.
    • With the caveat that we may have to trade some of their best friends to get those guys.  Do you regard Scherzer as a TOR pitcher you’d be happy getting as the top get?
    • I’m gonna play devils advocate for giggles.  As much as I want to win 2024, I don’t want to trade any of our standout prospects for a starter. I’m growing more and more fond of pitchers who have success because of pitch location and don’t max out on velocity. They’re less sexy, but they’re less vulnerable to TJ and cost less to acquire. Skubal is undoubtedly one of the best pitchers in baseball, but he’s upped his velocity each of the past two years. Means was a middling prospect until he found more velocity…..until he wrecked his arm. How are we going to feel about our competitive window if we give a huge haul for someone like Skubal and he’s under the knife in August? If the Royals stank and Seth Lugo was available, that’s the kind of guy I’d be targeting at a smaller cost of talent. Only a few teams are really out of the WC. If Oakland would trade Joey Estes for Connor Norby (spitballing suggestion only, don’t attack me), we’d probably lose our minds that ME didn’t shoot higher. But all things considered, including risk aversion, I’m not convinced that kind of pitcher and trade (preferably a lefty) wouldn’t be better for us. I don’t want to be on the flip side of a Bedard trade. We can sign a top FA starter (Rubenstein willing) who blows out his arm and not be deeply impacted, but we shouldn’t spend our prospect capital for a short term ace rental who’s lost to injury for his tenure….I’m more inclined to protect our competitive window. 
    • I don’t think any pitcher is a given. All of them carry the risk of the next pitch being the last for the season. But risk should be weighed vs potential reward. The proposition to be considered is what is more risky? Acquiring a starter with very high potential for reward (like Skubal) who is at risk for injury vs. acquiring a lesser talented starter who offers less upside yet still is at risk for injury vs. doing nothing/rolling with what we have with pitchers who are almost assuredly to give you a much lower ceiling and still carry the risk of injury.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...