Jump to content

Pitching Prospects Top 20


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

The recent thread on the Orioles section by @Sports Guy on Established arms vs. "non-established arms" got me thinking about the current OH prospects ranking list and who on it is a pitcher. So I went back and looked at @Tony-OH's list of the top 75 prospects. By the time I got to #50 I had 21 pitchers, (#21 is Portes) and thought I would list them out. So here goes, number in parentheses is their place on the overall prospects list:

1. McDermott (9)                        11. Young (30)

2. Povich (13).                             12. Wells (31)

3. Deleon (14)                              13. Sharkey (32)

4. Baumeister (16)                       14. Pinto (33)

5. Johnson (18)                            15. Gilles. (34)

6. Bright (21)                                 16. Forret (39)

7. Baumler (22)                              17. Pham (41)

8. Lord (26)                                    18. Cravey (43)

9. Nunez (27)                                 19. Palacios (44)

10. Marao (29)                                20. Armbruester (46)

I think we've talked a bit about McDermott and Povich. Beyond those two, are there any potential impact arms in this bunch that folks feel will impact the 2024 MLB club? It seems to me that obtaining some "non-established" but close to MLB ready arms might be a reasonable priority for ME and company this off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDermott and Povich could help thi year.  Even Pham and Armbruester could.  
 

DeLeon has a lot of upside but he’s got a long way to go and needs to show he can get through a year.  Baumler even more so.

I’m anxious to see how Baumeister and Lord look and think the odds of one of McDermott/Povich/Johnson turning into a good starter are good.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Deleon is my #1 pitching prospect. McDermott is #2 and to me, there is a good potential but a drop off after those 2.

The question is not whether you agree with the rankings. It is which pitchers might help the Orioles this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, panick said:

The question is not whether you agree with the rankings. It is which pitchers might help the Orioles this year.

McDermott is most likely.  He is the only one who’s had success, albeit sss, in AAA.  And he’s got the stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panick said:

The question is not whether you agree with the rankings. It is which pitchers might help the Orioles this year.

I think only McDermott, Povich and Armbruester have much chance of pitching for the Orioles this year.  I’d rank their chances of pitching in a way that helps the Orioles in that order.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think only McDermott, Povich and Armbruester have much chance of pitching for the Orioles this year.  I’d rank their chances of pitching in a way that helps the Orioles in that order.   

Agree with McDermott, Povich, and Armbruester above.  Sharkey could be a fast riser because he's not trying to check any starter boxes.  Trace Bright is a dark horse.  

 

I know they're not on this year's list, but Kyle Brnovich and Brandon Young still interest me.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

I'm curious to see how Teddy Sharkey's year unfolds.     He's about the same age and bonus as Orion Kerkering, who made it into Dave Dombrowski's bullpen last fall.

We'll see what the data says about 40 chunks of 15 pitches.

Sharkey could see ML time this year. I wouldn’t doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, btdart20 said:

Agree with McDermott, Povich, and Armbruester above.  Sharkey could be a fast riser because he's not trying to check any starter boxes.  Trace Bright is a dark horse.  

 

I know they're not on this year's list, but Kyle Brnovich and Brandon Young still interest me.  

Young is #30, and 11 on his list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I liked what I saw of Sharkey but he only pitched at Delmarva.  He likely starts at Aberdeen.   Getting to the majors next year seems like a super longshot.  

Drew Storen and Huston Street come to mind as relievers who were in the majors the year after they were drafted.  Of course, they both were first round picks.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Drew Storen and Huston Street come to mind as relievers who were in the majors the year after they were drafted.  Of course, they both were first round picks.  

Gregg Olson and Ben McDonald.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the obvious exceptions of losing Rodriguez and Hall, this list is better than last year's. But A LOT of this list is built on hope, and not much is built on production in the minors for the Orioles.

I hope it's a lot more impressive yet again in a year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I count 5 on the list that were acquired by trade, so good work by Elias to keep adding to the one area in the farm system that needed more depth and talent, arms. Bradish, Grayson, and Hall have graduated leaving the farm system needing some top level talent. I feel they still have depth, and there are names on this list that could be Top 100 MLB Prospects in the future (mostly international signs), but there is a glaring hole at the top of this list showing a need for near MLB ready/potential impact arms.

I wonder if Elias tries to swing a Santander or Hays (maybe packaged with a Mateo, Urias, Baumann, Akin, etc) for a Top 100-150 near MLB arm(s), especially if they can't land a Cease, etc.

If he could bring in 2 near MLB arms to add to the top of this prospect list, it would be a pretty solid list. Elias' hope would have to be that one or both arms are ready to help half way through the season.

This isn't necessarily the route I would go; I'd use this draft to try to grab a bunch of college arms. However, I'd listen on these types of deals and trust my scouting staff's advising on potential prospects

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...