Jump to content

The clips from Kennedy's "New Frontier" speech during the Orange Carpet?


ChipTait

Recommended Posts

During the Opening Day pregame ceremonies yesterday, the O's played an edited version of JFK's "New Frontier" speech, which he gave at the DNC in 1960.

My historian wife and I both found it a bit odd, and perhaps out of place.

Did anyone else feel it was a bit bizarre?  

Thanks,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love listening to JFK speak.  He was so incredibly inspiring and dynamic.   

I have no idea why that speech was inserted into the Opening Day ceremony.  I guess the O’s are entering a new frontier?   Absolutely a weird choice.  

I kind of loved it anyway though.   

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I wouldn’t know. I couldn’t hear anything because the sound system is complete dog sh*t.

Good thing Palmer made a point of telling DMR about that during the booth visit.

Multiple times! 😄

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, justD said:

Good thing Palmer made a point of telling DMR about that during the booth visit.

Multiple times! 😄

They couldn’t hear Brown’s pre game. We saw it on the Jumbotron. They had no idea if Brown was talking about him or Ben at first.

 

BTW, OD is the best day of the year and I love being there but I must say that not hearing Brown, Palmer and Big Ben does suck. I really enjoy the 3 of them together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They couldn’t hear Brown’s pre game. We saw it on the Jumbotron. They had no idea if Brown was talking about him or Ben at first.

 

BTW, OD is the best day of the year and I love being there but I must say that not hearing Brown, Palmer and Big Ben does suck. I really enjoy the 3 of them together.

If you can, I recommend going back and at least watching the innings where DR was in the booth with them. It really was great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I didn't see that part.  Choosing Kennedy is a bit weird, I suppose, but I agree with @Frobby.  Love hearing that man speak, even though I wasn't around for him.  

I was 6 when he was shot, so it’s not like I was politically aware or listening to his speeches at the time.  But I’ve heard a lot of them over the years.  Both the content and the delivery of his speeches were really compelling.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume it's a connection to JFK-

"As a boy, Rubenstein was inspired by President John F. Kennedy. He developed a keen interest in government and politics and hoped to pursue that someday."  

"Still interested in politics, Rubenstein knew that he wanted to pursue public service. He felt he did not have the charisma to be a political candidate, so he decided he would be the "man behind the man." He took a job on Wall Street with the politically attuned law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. "The firm included a number of attorneys I had always admired, including Ted Sorensen," says Rubenstein. "He was a role model for me since he had been the top speechwriter and advisor to President Kennedy. I was a very young associate and he was a very senior partner, but I did work with him on a number of projects and developed a high regard for him."

https://horatioalger.org/members/detail/david-m-rubenstein/

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kennedy's New Frontier speech was a call to action for the nation.   Since this is Elias 6th opening day and Rubenstien's first I tend to guess that it was Rubenstein who picked the Kennedy speech.  Part of his Next Chapter theme.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is a link to Kennedy's full speech.  It is definitely worth reading as a snapshot into a critical and very interesting time in our history, but it is also politically very partisan with the Cold War lurking around every corner. The Ted Sorensen connection makes sense to me as well, but why here and why now?  I admit that I also find it pretty obscure as a theme for the first Opening Day under new Orioles ownership. 

https://www.shapell.org/manuscript/jfk-1960-new-frontier-speech/#transcripts

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Off topic but while we’re here the Rob Reiner podcast about the Kennedy Assassination and the conspiracy theories behind it are fantastic. Had to drive to SC last week, that got us down there most of the way. 

Seconded.  Lots of info that was not previously aware and articulated well by Reiner and Soledad OBrien. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...