Jump to content

Anthony Santander 2024


DirtyBird

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Last year Santander had a .241 OBP/.491 OPS after 14 games.  Hyde’s not going to be that reactive to every slump a player has.   

Last year was last year. And the offense needed to take a step forward from last year in order to be a contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Last year was last year. And the offense needed to take a step forward from last year in order to be a contender.

The Orioles are on pace to score 880 runs, which is 73 more than last year.   Individual players are going to have ups and downs during the year.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

I’m tired of seeing this .230 OBP black hole penciled into the heart of the lineup card every game.
He would bat 7th and start about 60% of the games for a legit contender.

And You could say the exact same thing about Gunnar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORIOLE33 said:

And You could say the exact same thing about Gunnar. 

Not really. Gunnar is among the league leaders in hard hit balls. Similar to Westburg, odds are, he will start catching some breaks.

Santander is chasing twice as much as Gunnar and is toward the bottom of the league in hard hit %

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I felt this way last year during his slow start. We all know how that turned out.

I think I remember hearing something last year that he thrives in the hot weather/hates the cold. It’ll be above 70 today and it’ll be getting consistently much warmer than that soon, so hopefully his bat heats up accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the number that best sums up Santander’s current slump is his 27% infield fly/fly ball rate.  He’s also got a .27 GO/AO ratio right now, less than half his normal rate.  Simply put, he’s getting under the ball much too often right now.  I have complete confidence he will straighten that out and go on a tear eventually.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Orioles Jim said:

I felt this way last year during his slow start. We all know how that turned out.

I think I remember hearing something last year that he thrives in the hot weather/hates the cold. It’ll be above 70 today and it’ll be getting consistently much warmer than that soon, so hopefully his bat heats up accordingly.

How was he once it cooled off last fall, in September and October?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santander is an incredibly streaky hitter. He is always up and down. Last year he would go on a complete tear and then look like garbage for 40 at bats.  
 

Everything, good and bad, is exacerbated early in the season.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

How was he once it cooled off last fall, in September and October?

There could be something to it. For his career he has a .636 March/April OPS, .645 Sept/Oct OPS, but every other month is much higher. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh.  Santander has not been playing well since the second half of last year.  He had a couple "streaky" months (May 2023 & August 2023) but statistically everything from the second half and into this season, is not pretty. 

We got some young guys (Stowers / Kjerstad) knocking on the door but are we going to just stick it out with him this season.... we know we are not re-signing him, maybe it's time to explore some options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Santander is an incredibly streaky hitter. He is always up and down. Last year he would go on a complete tear and then look like garbage for 40 at bats.  
 

Everything, good and bad, is exacerbated early in the season.

 

I think most hitters are pretty streaky, moreso than people think.  And yes, it stands out when someone is hot or cold to begin the year.   

When I was a kid, I followed the Rod Carew rule: no statistics meant anything until Rod Carew was leading the league in batting.   That worked pretty well while Carew won 6 batting titles in 7 years (he finished 3rd by two points the other year).   Nowadays, I basically generally don’t take stats too seriously until the end of May.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The point wasn’t who was better between Irvin or Grayson, it was that if there is even a discussion, Grayson can’t be considered part of a “Big 3”.  After his performance in the playoffs last year and his lack of command so far this season, he needs to show a decent amount of improvement to be looked at that way.
    • https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/grayson-rodriguez-680570?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/cole-irvin-608344?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Grayson has a higher ceiling than Cole, I think almost anyone would argue, yes.  But even if we're strictly looking at numbers, despite Grayson's uneven start, he is still statistically better than Cole in a handful of areas (mainly whiff rate, K rate, xBA, xERA).
    • Given his success here and perhaps lack of strong interest elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised if Lopez would be OK with a minor league deal here.
    • Lots of stats say Irvin hasn’t been better this year. Grayson has had a few rough starts around his injury…he’s been excellent otherwise and has been excellent since he got re-called last year. Irvin is pitching very well but he’s not a sub 3 ERA guy.  He may be a sub 4 ERA guy though. 
    • One factor to consider in taking HS talent is age.  Historically, prep players that are 19'ish work out less often than their younger counterparts.  The main reason is that they are physically more mature, and thus have an advantage.  There have been exceptions certainly, but often they have weaker careers.   Sig is well aware of the analytics, so it would be a bit surprising to see us go that route. In 2019, we took Gunnar 26 days before his 18th birthday, and Holliday was 18.6 years old when we took him in 2022.  It's a factor... but I can't say with certainty we wouldn't draft a 19-year old that early.
    • I don't have a horse in that race, but I question your logic. Seems like you're saying: Stuff > Results. Or maybe, so far this year Irvin is better, but long term you're betting on Grayson?
    • I hadn't read that, but it seems we are thinking similar things. 😃  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...