Jump to content

Anthony Santander 2024


DirtyBird

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

Isn't this just a repeat of your Mullins thread?  I can't wait for the Hays thread... or did I miss that one?

Hays was benched.

Santander should spend more time there also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheWall said:

If Santander gets more days off it's likely to result in Hays playing more. 

I would prefer Hays in the bottom of the lineup occasionally over Santander in the 3/4 spot every game right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santander deserves the right to struggle but taking his games played per week closer to 4-5 would be ideal while struggling. He’s had this back issue for 2 years and who knows if it is still bothering him. I think the ideal replacement would be to start Hays a couple days a week. The other option would be to DFA/ trade Urias and bring up Kjerstad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Santander is an incredibly streaky hitter. He is always up and down. Last year he would go on a complete tear and then look like garbage for 40 at bats.  
 

Everything, good and bad, is exacerbated early in the season.

 

Yep, and you could say the same thing about Mountcastle and Hays. That was my issue with them as the "veteran" core. I would have tried to move one of them this offseason for a top reliever or part of a package for a starter before they got Burnes. 

Santander is going to get out of this slump and he's going to go on a tear at some point because that's who he is, but he's always going to be a guy who's a blackhole for a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santa is chasing out of the zone 10% than last year so far.  And he's making contact 6-7% more often while chasing too...

His HH% on 4S is half of what it was last year.

PU% is 17% compared to MLB average of 7%.

1st pitch swing is up 8%.  13% more than league average. 

Is it a bat speed thing?  He's hitting CH much better than norm.  

As a team, the O's seem more aggressive at the plate.  Is that messing with what's worked for him the last few years?  Hopefully, Santa can get back to being more selective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s almost like he’s following the same pattern he did last year and will probably end up being the same 20% above league average hitter that he has been for the last few seasons. Tonight, he also had what appeared to be a nice catch based on where he was positioned, though I haven’t looked for the catch probability. I love conclusions made based on 10 or so games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2024 at 6:33 AM, DirtyBird said:

I’m tired of seeing this .230 OBP black hole penciled into the heart of the lineup card every game.
He would bat 7th and start about 60% of the games for a legit contender.

Funny, you never get tired of being wrong.  That’s what I call stamina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sydnor said:

It’s almost like he’s following the same pattern he did last year and will probably end up being the same 20% above league average hitter that he has been for the last few seasons. Tonight, he also had what appeared to be a nice catch based on where he was positioned, though I haven’t looked for the catch probability. I love conclusions made based on 10 or so games.

Does that mean he will stink again in October?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

As I said, he clearly needed a day out of the lineup.

The day you said he was a black hole in the lineup he went 2-4 and hit an important homer the next night.   You should buy a broken clock and see if you can be right more often than it is.  My money is on the clock by 2 each day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Oh agee Kjerstad’s promotion/playing time is not important enough in terms of it’s possible impact on revenue. But there are other player decisions that are/will be.
    • Last year he went 5.1 innings with 4 hits, 2 earned, 5 strikeouts and 2 walks in his lone start at Camden Yards. For his career against us, he's got a 1.99 ERA in 45.1 innings, 4 wins and 0 losses.  His WHIP against us is 0.927.  It's the lowest WHIP against any team he's faced consistently (I'm not counting interleague eams where he's thrown 8 innings against a team) in the AL outside of the Guardians.  And he's got 23.1 more innings against us than he does them. This bleeping guy owns us.  I'm not expecting much out of our offense tonight but I would absolutely love it if we lit him up like a Christmas tree.    
    • Kimbrel update. I suspect he's not going to be available tonight.  
    • To your point...  Mike Baumann and Yohan Ramirez have combined to throw 2.2 innings in the last 10 days. So really, we pretty much have a 6 man bullpen, because those guys are rarely ever going to pitch, and almost certainly not in close games. So yeah, that's a problem.   It's possible that those 2 could both be replaced by some combination of Suarez, Irvin, and Wells in the pen as the season goes on.    Suddenly you have have a lot more length in the pen as well as guys who you think (hope) can perform adequately in closer games.
    • No question they are burying him. He is a MLB ready prospect who would probably be playing for most other teams.  The question is do we get more out of trading him than we get by keeping him in the minors. We don't know if Elias has received any compelling trade offers. I would say the upside of keeping Kjerstad is a hedge against 1) injury to Hays, O'Hearn or Santander, or 2) regression by Cowser. There are many alternate realities in which Kjerstad would be playing regularly even without any trades. So far they haven't materialized, but if they do we will be glad we have him. I would be open to trading him as well as Stowers, but I would not be giving them away. For now, Kjerstad and Stowers producing in AAA is a "good problem to have". If we get to July and we have obvious holes that go unfilled via trade, then something is wrong and it's time to get mad.
    • If Hays isn't back this weekend, I think something like this is about what will start to happen, but we are seeing playoff posture these Yankees games. Hopefully Kjerstad is becoming a top expert on the Yankees relievers he might face in one big moment these next 48 hours.
    • I don't write that great.  In real life I have a massive stutter and failed my Maryland writing test in High school the first time and had to retake it.   I honestly was just trying to make a joke on the stats driven front office.  I would never imply or act as if your opinion is not wanted.   I think Kjerstad must be in a box of big bat no glove no need to treat like a true prospect.  I was trying to bring that point up in a funny way.  Obviously I failed.  I often do.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...