Jump to content

Why is corking a bat illegal?


DrungoHazewood

Recommended Posts

To call what they do corking is a misnomer. They do not use cork but rather most of the time it is shredded rubber. The benefit is slight in bat speed. Where they really get the advantage is the reaction of the rubber, imparting more "bounce" then a full wood bounce. Take the top off of a metal bat, insert racket balls, and see the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason I think that it used to be illegal to have the end of the barrel of the bat be missing. Shoot I don't know how to describe this but you know how there are two types of woods bats, those with a solid top and those with a dip in it, where the tip has been removed.

I recall when the Cardinals played an exhibition tour in Japan following a World Series win (probably 1964, but possibly 1967) and noticed some Japanese players using the bats with a conical end on the barrel. Lou Brock, and possibly some other Cardinals, brought some of those bats back and were using them in spring training the next year. I'm not positive, but it does seem to me that they might have been illegal for regular season games at the time -- certainly there was a mild controversy over Lou Brock using them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Mythbusters, so I was excited when this one came on.

However, I think they actually did the wrong experiment for the corked bat. They seemed to be assuming that the effect was with the mass of the bat, not the speed of the bat, so they were swinging different bats at the same speed.

If they had done an experiment where the same force was applied to a corked bat and a regular bat, where they could measure both the differences in speed and the differences in distance when the ball was hit, it would have been more effective.

I was surprised, though, when they measured sliding versus running to the base and found that it is faster to slide when you have to stop on the base.

Might have to send my above complaint in, as well as suggesting they measure diving-for versus running-through first base, so they can do a revisit :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Word is bet on baseball it's a year.  Bet on a game you are involved with it's lifetime.
    • O"s win, Yankees lose!!! Yay!!!
    • Saw an episode of The Compound today where Ian Happ was talking about how many players will play for the stats - in particular, defensive metrics or even just the way WAR is calculated based on positioning. He said some infielders know they have better range to their glove side, for instance, so they'll shade the other way. But the metric dings them because they position themselves in the "wrong" spot. And yet, they're going to be paid based on WAR, so then they might instead choose to go into the "right" position even though they know they'd be able to do better where they're more comfortable.  That was kinda stunning to me.  Another thing he mentioned was how a left fielder, like he is, will let a ball drop for a single for better WAR points. I will have to go back and listen again, but I'm pretty sure he was saying that he will be rated higher if he lets it drop than if he positioned himself so he could get there sooner to catch it.  Like, getting outs wasn't as important as getting credit for positioning in order to be paid more, since WAR is what's used to determine pay, and positioning is rated above catching the damn ball.  It was ludicrous.   The reason I'm adding this to this thread is talking about Cowser and how he is defensively.  I often wonder why he seems so reluctant to dive for a ball that you'd see Hays or Mullins dive for in a heartbeat.  Maybe this is part of it? 
    • It's hard to see the downside for the Cubs if they ask for the moon then keep Imanaga if nobody bites.
    • No, but it will pain me to see him go. Extremely likeable player who's had big moments here.
    • He might match up with Cole unless the Yankees get aggressive and pitch Cole on 4 days rest for the Wed game.
    • He had a hot 21-game stretch to start the season and has been a terrible hitter since the last week in April. He's been a bad hitter a lot longer than he has been a good hitter. He's striking out 31% of the time and he's been basically a net zero with the bat for nearly 2 months.  That should not be beyond criticism, and the fact that it BLOWS YOUR MIND shows that it isn't difficult to do. His defense has been great but his OPS in May was .580 and his OPS in June is low .540's after today.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...