Jump to content

MLB needs to get rid of the Wildcard


Greenpastures23

Recommended Posts

For one, you have to win an absurd amount of games just to make the World Series.

Wildcard made more sense with the large divisions, but not with the current small ones.  

Before the wild card was the best. Once you finish in first all you had to do was win 3 games and you made the World Series...at least with the large divisions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I know as a fan I enjoy nothing more than having a team on a 90 win pace out of the pennant race in August while a team in another division gets into the playoffs with 84 wins.

 

I would rather have that than have a 100 win Orioles team not make the playoffs like back in the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

I would rather have that than have a 100 win Orioles team not make the playoffs like back in the day

I'm assuming the 100 win team would at least still be in the race pretty far into the season.

So the last two months they would at least be playing for something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Greenpastures23 said:

How could they add more teams when the season is already too long?

I didn’t say they will. But I think there’s a better chance of adding playoff teams than eliminating them. If anything, they’d cut the regular season back to 154 and add an extra round.
 

Would suspect the player’s union would gladly take the same compensation for less games and—as was pointed out— the longer you can keep a fanbase invested, the more money owners can make. 
 

For what it’s worth, I think there’s too many WC teams now. Prefer just one. I think these extra rounds water down the importance of the most grueling regular season in all of sports. But, alas, money drives the cart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don't think anyone is saying that they didn't try their best. The issue is that their best was found lacking in the playoffs once again.
    • I especially agree with this last paragraph. There are so few mistake pitches in the playoffs. Even today, I think we were about to put a 5 spot on Lugo there. He was on the ropes. Buts it’s the playoffs, he gets pulled and it’s match ups all the way down the line. We needed to be able to push a run or two across. Simplify things. And this is where it once again reminds of me of our playoff teams in the 2010’s. I came away from them very disillusioned with the HR or bust. I really thought we were moving away from that organizationally with how we drafted and developed. To me, 2023’s offense was so much more fun. And yet here we are again, HR or bust. 
    • You’re right. John Harbaugh should have been fired about 6 years ago. But he has a lifetime contract and the owner has checked out on caring about the team. Lots of the empty seats are the norm now at both stadiums.
    • If we resign Burnes then  Fried and let’s say pluck off a couple relievers on the FA market. Now let’s say Uncle Dave has decided that the one freaking thing he wants in the time he has left is to see his team win the World Series because he wants it to be so. He says sure Mike …. Go get  a few bats also.  Not likely to happen but we have no clue how much or little Ruebenstein will spend to add to this core.    Can we win then without trading one of three guys? Your whole premise is off because it is an absolute. There are plenty of ways this team can substantially improve without trading any of those three. It may also prove true that piece we covet comes at that cost.    I’m not saying your premise may not become reality and the cost getting a key piece they covet. It may be they can get that piece for say Heston or Povitch, McDermett, Bradfield or some combination of those type guys. I am just suggesting that keeping an open mind until we know what kind of money we will have to bring in pieces that do not cost prospects. Then decide what else is needed 
    • We’re not even in the playoffs without the wild card. Seems like an odd rant. 
    • Exactly.  I'm not convinced the hitting woes are here to stay because of the personnel involved -- at least not the young personnel.  The hitting fell off for many guys this season who are clearly talented.  We don't know why, but we have to trust the team will get to the bottom of it.  What choice do we have?
    • I’m not up on the latest analytical thinking—I am really not that kind of sports fan anymore—but walks?  I can’t imagine that organizationally they are discounting walks.  Our marquee young players seemed to distinguish themselves in the maturity of their approaches on their scouting reports and in their earlier play even at the major league level.  Contrast that with the last two days where we had like seven or eight Javy Baez’s (or whoever, feel like I’ve seen a lot of clips of that guy hacking at air).  How many high fastballs did they swing through or pop up?  And nobody adjusted.  The Royals had them completely lost and the council of hitting coaches obviously couldn’t fix it.  I don’t know man, everyone’s just regressed.  How many freaking times do you hear how it’s a “game of adjustments” and who really did that well in the second half, let alone the last two games?  They failed at that both macro and micro.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...