Jump to content

JR House


TommyD4207

Recommended Posts

Quick post I promise!

Mackus, that's an awfully, awfully, awfully large leap in faith that you're taking in saying that House would surefire not be that far behind Bako in terms of runners being thrown out. A few reasons:

1. Guys get thrown out at a higher rate in the IL than in the AL. The difference is greater than the difference between Bako and House's CS %. That has to count for something. What does it count for? Well, like TGO said earlier in this thread, it's probably guys stealing because they're looking to impress their parent clubs. One way to do that is to show a wider skillset. This probably means that you're having guys that are stealing more than they typically would or are capable of. Consequently, they get thrown out sometimes, thus equating to the higher throw-out rate. Also, I tend to believe that guys in the big leagues are better baserunners.

2. Remember, you're only looking at one year's worth of work. His 2006 season gets continually glossed over. If last year he threw out guys with great authority, I tend to believe that this year would be much more discounted than it is. As of right now, it's used as the main reference point and I don't believe that that's fair. If we're betting on what he would do next year, you'd have to take both years into consideration. Both years he had more than the league average amount of guys try to steal on him and he had a below average CS %. As shown in the Hardball Times article that os1971 gave, he had among the worst CS % there was. That has to count for something. When I get the time, I'll do a comparison for that.

My overall point is that he'd have to be some kind of awful to not make up for his defense with his bat. His bat is, IMO, going to be far, far superior to most backup catchers. If most backup catchers aer only superior defensively compared to House (and from what I've seen, he hasn't looked that bad) then we're still coming out ahead, plus we'd have a great option for PH opportunities and DH/1B role.

I know that House is a better overall catcher than Bako. That I don't doubt at all. Now, there may be other backup catchers available that are overall better than House, but we haven't exactly done a great job of finding them as a franchise.

I know I'd much rather give the job to House than to bet on the O's finding someone better. I'd argue they haven't had a backup catcher as good as House in a very, very long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply
House caught 51 games in the minors this year (can't find exact # of innings caught, lets assume 9 innings per game, or 459). Bako caught 57 total games, 421 innings.

Lets average those guys out to 500 innings caught each to make it easier:

Bako - 500 innings - 33 SB - 8 CS

House - 500 innings - 62 SB - 18 CS

Using Drungo's formula:

Bako = (33*.25) - (8*.75) = +2.25 runs

House = (62*.25) - (18*.75) = +2.00 runs

So House was worth roughly as many runs throwing out runners in AAA as Bako was against MLB guys. I'll cede that MLB runners probably are better, and House's numbers wouldn't be as good in the bigs, but no way will there be a big enough difference that House won't make up for it with his bat.

IMO, House is a much better option at backup C for 2008 than Bako. Now, Bako is a terrible option, so thats not saying much right there. We may be able to do better than House, but I doubt we'll find anybody who has as good of a bat as House does, just somebody who is much stronger defensively (Bako is pretty terrible defensively as well).

Very good post. This is what I was asking for earlier when saying the caught stealing attempts need to be factored in, and as I figured, this throws a huge wrench in Tommy's original post which some House haters instantly took as the gospel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good post. This is what I was asking for earlier when saying the caught stealing attempts need to be factored in, and as I figured, this throws a huge wrench in Tommy's original post which some House haters instantly took as the gospel.

Why do you do this? Who is a "House hater"? I haven't seen anybody hating on House, only some people who are curious about better understanding his strengths and weaknesses....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you do this? Who is a "House hater"? I haven't seen anybody hating on House, only some people who are curious about better understanding his strengths and weaknesses....

Do what? You act as if I do whatever this is all the time or something.

Fine, haters was the wrong term, but there are people who have made it clear they don't think House should be a major league catcher, and don't think it matters much or at all that we dropped him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you do this? Who is a "House hater"? I haven't seen anybody hating on House, only some people who are curious about better understanding his strengths and weaknesses....

You were here during spring training when the House Wars first broke out, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget that if a manager feels his guy at first base can get to second safe at a decent pace, he isn't going to hesitate doing more hit and runs. We would then have less double plays too. You can't just look at steals you also have to look at balls put in play with a man at first and missed double plays. This happens alot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I finally found the time to complete my thoughts:

1. Let’s look at 2006 first, shall we? JR House had 92 guys steal successfully on him over the course of 565 innings. That’s a successful steal once every 6 innings. He had 27 caught. That was good enough for a 227 CS %.

In 2006, Bako had 20 guys successfully steal on him with 9 getting caught, good enough for a 310 CS %. In 2005, Bako had 1 guy successfully steal on him in 107 innings, 3 caught. I’ve been adding those together in order to get a sample size. That comes out to 21 guys stealing successfully and 12 being caught over 499 innings of catching.

If we adjust it so that it’s both 565 innings it comes out to:

House: 92 successful, 27 caught, 227 CS %

Bako: 24 successful, 14 caught, 310 CS %

For that year in the Texas League, the average attempted steals per game was 1.06 attempted steals per game. House had 1.89 attempted steals per game. The average CS % was actually 361. To say the least, he did pretty pitiful. He was very, very below average. He’s 63% as good as the rest of the catchers as far as CS % and he has nearly twice as many guys trying to steal on him.

The reason we were able to come to an agreement (at least I assume it was an agreement considering I got a PM asking me about it and then I posted it on the forum and received no disagreement) that House being 75% as good as his league and there being 25% more base stealers in the IL as opposed to the AL, this is now negated. The average per game for the Texas League, as stated is nearly identical to the IL and House was only 63% as good as his league. This cannot be overlooked.

How this doesn’t raise anybody’s eyebrows is beyond me.

House allows nearly 4 times as many base stealers. He does get twice as many outs though. That’s still twice the amount of total baserunners though. Then again, it all goes back to what rshack and myself have been saying which will be my 2nd point.

2. We have to consider the quality of the baserunners and the fact that they’re facing him. I certainly agree with what rshack said in that there are guys going on him that normally are pretty terrible base stealers. Nelson Cruz is a good example, as he was caught stealing by House this year. If you’re trying to use that as evidence that he’s a good catcher, sorry, but I believe you’ve chosen the wrong guy. As mentioned, he only attempted to steal 6 times this year in 96 games and was thrown out on 4 of those times. I didn’t see his other steals to the best of my knowledge but I do know that when he tried to steal on House he got a godawful jump. It was terrible. I’m pretty sure that most people on this board could’ve thrown him out. They might not have caught the pitch to begin with, but all the same it was a terrible, terrible jump. Any catcher in MLB should be expected to make that play.

3. I have no clue why it keeps being said that Bako is not a good option for 2008. I am yet to see anybody claim that we should keep Bako for 2008. Sorry, but that’s a red herring.

4. I am not saying at all that Bako would most assuredly outproduce House at all. Next year or had he played this year. That’s not what I’m after. What I AM after, however, is that I’m trying to show that there is plenty of reason to believe that it might NOT happen. It’s not a foregone conclusion at all in my opinion. The fact that it’s very, very possible that teams will look at the fact that he had a lot more guys steal on him than average and that his CS % is below average, it’s not good.

5. It is also not a foregone conclusion that he does hit to a 750 OPS or whatever the amount that everyone is citing him at. As I mentioned, his 2006 MLE OPS was 719. I’m assuming that they’re saying that the Texas League is about 84% as difficult as MLB. If we used that figure and used his hitting as strictly a catcher when he was with Corpus Christi, you get a 665 OPS. That’s not that good. When you consider that he has hit considerably differently as a catcher than he has as a 1B or DH, it’s concerning to say the least.

6. People keep saying that he wasn't that bad from what they saw of him. Just curious, but did any of you see him at Norfolk on a consistent basis? I've seen multiple people say that they believe he's a good catcher based on that. Does that strike anybody else as a huge double standard? In his limited time, he put up a 268 OBP here. If you can assume that he's that good of a catcher, then is it not just as logical to assume that he hits that well? 46 innings is nowhere near enough time to gauge catcher performance in my humblest of opinions. Note, I am not, by any means saying that I believe that is what House what put up as an OBP if he were played on a consistent basis. I am just calling it as I see it as far as seeing a double standard goes.

What I refute is that it’s a foregone conclusion that House would outproduce Bako. It’s simply not that simple. In 2006, his OPS only translated to 132 points higher than Bako’s as them both being strictly catchers. In 2006, he was a revolving door to base stealers, 64% as good as his league and he had nearly twice as many guys attempt to steal on him.

If you don’t believe that the runners in MLB are better, then I don’t know what to tell you. If you are not concerned that he has been 64% and 75% as good as the rest of his league. If you’re 75% as good as a 900 OPS hitter, you’re a 675 OPS hitter. If you’re 64% as good as a 900 OPS hitter, you’re a 576 OPS hitter. That’s just to put it into perspective.

Also, lest we forget, it has already been stated that three guys I would trust more than myself on this are Leo Mazzone, Gary Allenson, and Dave Trembely. If everyone believes that this is just some huge vendetta that they have against JR House and that they hate him inexplicably and tha the was given a fair shake just based on their own intution, I completely disagree with that. Leo Mazzone believed that Paul Bako’s mentoring would be best for the young pitching staff. I completely agree with that school of thought. It’s been said that Bako is a good guy to have behind the plate if you’re a pitcher. Gary Allenson, his AAA manager, was a major league catcher. There are other things to catching besides base stealing and I tend to believe that he would know about that. Instead, he didn’t fill out House in his line-up card everyday. Alberto Castillo, at 80 years old, got considerable amounts of playing time this year. Dave Trembley has known JR House since he was 19 years old, they have a great relationship. He had the opportunity to give him regular playing time. Instead, he only gave him 46 innings of catching this year. If this is all just some huge vendetta, then I completely disagree with that. These are three guys that I would tend to trust the opinions of.

Once again, I am not, by any means, saying that we should keep Bako around for next year. I am not saying that we should keep House around. What I am saying is that it is by no means a foregone conclusion that House would outproduce Bako. He has a lot more guys attempt to steal on him than typical guys in the minors or majors. If anyone can state without a shadow of doubt that House would outproduce Bako, it’s really not relevant to my argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say House is likely to be better than Bako, and has the much better upside, therefore, he should still be on the 40 man roster, and should be on the 25 man roster over Bako unless we go out and get someone who is a better option than House. Would anyone disagree with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I finally found the time to complete my thoughts:

1. Let’s look at 2006 first...

...If anyone can state without a shadow of doubt that House would outproduce Bako, it’s really not relevant to my argument.

That was really long...

I think boiling this all down you get a couple of pretty clear indications:

1) JR House is a far, far better hitter than Paul Bako. Given 200 at bats in the majors I estimate that House would be 15-20 runs better. House is a .750 OPS hitter in the majors if he's even in the neighborhood of a typical translation of his AAA stats. A more optimistic assessment would put him in the .800+ range, but I'll be conservative and stick with .750. We know beyond any doubt that Bako is a .550-ish hitter. There's really no debate here.

2) Given the best available data it seems that House might allow nearly twice as many stolen bases as Bako, but at a success rate that's not terribly different. Given Tommy's SB/CS data in 565 innings, the difference in runs between them is about +7 to Bako.

3) So putting #1 and #2 together House is worth between one and two wins over Paul Bako.

4) Justifying keeping Bako as your backup catcher over House would involve some combinations of intangibles that is worth about two wins and $600k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say House is likely to be better than Bako, and has the much better upside, therefore, he should still be on the 40 man roster, and should be on the 25 man roster over Bako unless we go out and get someone who is a better option than House. Would anyone disagree with that?

I think that's a pretty rational conclusion. Like Leitch said, it's probably a good idea to actually have a better backup catcher in hand before you go discarding the one you do have. The Baltimore Orioles don't have any catchers in their organization that played at a higher level in 2007 than JR House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say House is likely to be better than Bako, and has the much better upside, therefore, he should still be on the 40 man roster, and should be on the 25 man roster over Bako unless we go out and get someone who is a better option than House. Would anyone disagree with that?

I would say that for 2008, it could very well be House. That has nothing to do with my point, but I do agree with you on that. I think that Bako is done at this point. He'll be 36 next year and that's the age when catchers decline, or for him, go into attrition. But, like I said I don't want House as the back-up catcher next year.

That's not what this argument was about at all. Nowhere was I ever saying that I wanted Bako back next year. I have stated repeatedly that the guy I would most like is Mike Redmond. He hits better than Bako and he's known for being a guy that the pitchers like, he's got a good CS % and he doesn't have the pitchers experience the Boston Marathon behind them.

When you have a guy who's having nearly twice as many guys steal on you as the average catcher in that league, there's something up. That's too glaring of a weakness to be overlooked.

To say that the Orioles are limited in their options as far as back-up catchers go to House and Bako is simply not correct. If they want to bring House back in a role where he plays 1B/DH/PH, I would be all for giving him a shot. Again, his 2006 season projected him at a 719 OPS, but his 2007 season gave him better outlook. I wouldn't call him a bad hitter, but I think he's a much better player when he's not behind the plate. Besides, if he's there, that means no infamous 3rd catcher. I think we all remember Raul Chavez. ;)

The Orioles are not limited to Bako and House and this really should not be a discussion really I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say House is likely to be better than Bako, and has the much better upside, therefore, he should still be on the 40 man roster, and should be on the 25 man roster over Bako unless we go out and get someone who is a better option than House. Would anyone disagree with that?

I tend to disagree with the idea that either one of them matters. Personally, I have nothing against either of them, and I hope they both have satisfying careers. I just don't know why people here care so much, that's all.

I think Tommy's doing a great job of looking into this. It appears that he's running into the mysteriously-great iconic power of JR's MiL OPS. The whole point of stats is to let you investigate things. It's not to just pick one prefab stat and then claim it trumps all others. I think a lot of people are invested in JR's MiL OPS to the exclusion of the rest of the package he presents. I don't know why. It seems like a tribal conflict to me, and poor Tommy is trying to use reason.

As for the O's, I think DT is the best ML friend JR's ever gonna have. If DT doesn't want him enough to press for him, that's significant to me. Nobody's gonna tell DT he can't have the dirt-cheap 3rd-string C he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...