Jump to content

CBSSports: Hardy & Harris for Hoey & Jacobson a done deal


hoosiers

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not sure if I would part with Tillman or who the best 1B/LF options really are, but we should think big.

DLee might be a decent option and a big upgrade from last year, but we still have payroll flexibility and some good pieces to possibly trade.

I think AM is following a pretty good (and somewhat obvious) script so far with Reynolds, Koji and Hardy, but I agree in general that we should not shy away from the premium players - Greinke, Cliff Lee, etc.

Anyone know whereabouts our payroll for next year currently is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see the Orioles taking on Harris in salary relief, presumably in exchange for sending lesser prospects to the Twins. Harris is set to make 1.75 million this season which is wildly extravagant for a terrible utility infielder, especially for a team like the Twins. Hopefully he can bounce back, but if he doesn't and Andino outplays him in spring training I wouldn't be surprised to see Harris have the fattest contract on the Norfolk Tides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only possible explanation for this, is that for whatever reason, the Orioles like Bartlett better than Hardy. I personally have no idea how that would be possible.
I heard on XM that Bartlett was open to extending with the Pads. That might have been the kicker, if Hardy isn't. But we get Harris as well. I think this is a great move.:2yay-thumb:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see the Orioles taking on Harris in salary relief, presumably in exchange for sending lesser prospects to the Twins. Harris is set to make 1.75 million this season which is wildly extravagant for a terrible utility infielder, especially for a team like the Twins. Hopefully he can bounce back, but if he doesn't and Andino outplays him in spring training I wouldn't be surprised to see Harris have the fattest contract on the Norfolk Tides.

He didn't play much last year why I don't know. But he isn't terrible and he plays every position except catcher so he can be very useful. I agree though if Andino outplays him then no loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Credit to AM. It is tough to build through trades, but he is doing it. This is very impressive stuff. The guy is just so cool under fire.

Just two off seasons ago AM did the very same thing that impressed the fan base with his decisively swift maneuvering, albeit in a rebuilding mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just from various Twins blogs and the comments on MLBtraderumors.

Here's one place: http://www.twinkietown.com/2010/12/8/1865273/2010-mlb-winter-meetings-twins-day-3-wrap-up#comments

Some names Twins fans were throwing around: Roberts, Jones, Markakis, and Koji (even though he was still a free agent; not sure how'd that work).

Yeah I'd say they're going to be upset with this haul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know whereabouts our payroll for next year currently is?

I figure it this way:

$33 MM after adding Reynolds

17 MM (approx) Guthrie, Scott, Jones, Pie

5 MM Uehara

6 MM Hardy

1.5 MM Harris

6 MM various league minimums

So, $69 MM more or less although I could be off a bit on the three arb-eligibles and the total number of the pre-arb guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure it this way:

$33 MM after adding Reynolds

17 MM (approx) Guthrie, Scott, Jones, Pie

5 MM Uehara

6 MM Hardy

1.5 MM Harris

10 MM various league minimums

So, $73 MM more or less although I could be off a bit on the three arb-eligibles.

Well, in '11 Reynolds only makes $5m. Assuming we pick up the option, though, we will owe him $23.5m over the next 3 years (or $13m over 2 if we decline it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm honestly starting to get worried about guys like Adley and our prospects. If these guys don't pan out we aren't going to be a successful franchise for a while.  There's no reason why the offense should be this bad right now. 
    • Say what you will about Mouncastle's consistency at the plate. Compared to anyone else on the team he's by far our best fielding 1st baseman. Not even close. Every short hop with O'Hearn is an adventure.
    • I'm not necessarily going to buy that Holliday and Mayo should be expected to struggle this much. Jackson Merrill hasn't.   Jackson Chourio hasn't.   It's not automatic that guys have to go through a period where they are hitting around .100 and striking out more than half the time.   Lots of good players come up, have some ups and downs, but are not THAT bad.
    • Sure does...but I believe he was acquired for 2025 so I won't make any judgment till June or so.
    • We don't need his bat, we are doing just fine.
    • For me, winning the division is the greatest accomplishment left in the game. When I was growing up, four teams would qualify for the playoffs: in each league, the best team in the east and the best in the west would face off in a championship series, and the winner would go to the World Series.  Winning the division back then was the due reward for playing great ball all season long. That's how it still should be. That's the whole problem with the current playoff system, in a nutshell. Winning a division after playing 162 games should mean a lot.  As for this year's Orioles, I ceased to be disappointed in them sometime in late July or so. Instead, I regard them as a promising work-in-progress whose best days lie in the years ahead. They are kind of like the Houston Astros just when they started to get good but still weren't a world-class team.
    • I can't help but wonder if our hitting coaches basically just do one thing:   preach the launch angle approach that Elias has determined that leads to optimal overall results.   Don't worry about strikeouts.   Emphasis on doing the most damage when you swing (vs just trying to put the ball in play, hit 'em where they ain't, etc). And that approach, taken as a whole, DOES lead to better overall results, and I believe it IS the correct holistic approach for an organization to take in drafting, developing, and coaching players? But if it is the only thing our hitting coaches know how to teach, could that also be a problem?    When a batter is in a slump, maybe he should be less concerned with focusing on the amount of damage he does per swing, but jsut with putting the ball in play to make something happen.    Could there be a psychological effect?   Players and ex-players will talk abouit a bloop hit helping them get out of a slump.   Football players will talk about going immediately back to a receiver who drops a ball to boost his confidence and "keep him in the game". And most "old school" baseball coaches believed in these things, and used them to help guys get out of slumps.   Maybe there is still some wisdom in that approach, not as a primary approach, but to help a guy get his confidence back, start seeing the ball better, etc.   And maybe the guys we hired aren't able to, even temporarily, change what they are telling guys to help them when they are struggling. Just speculating.   Grasping for answers at the astonishing lack of hitting we are seeing on so many nights.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...