Jump to content

When are we allowed to get excited about Wieters?


SticksandStones

Recommended Posts

I know he's started hot in the past, but I've never seen him hit like this from the left side of the plate before. His swing and pre-swing batting stance remind me a lot of Hardy when he's up there, he's made a noticeable adjustment. He seems to be able to get the barrel on the bat on pitches on the outside of the plate for the first time since I've seen him in the bigs. It has always been said that catchers take a longer time to adjust to hitting at the big league level, is this the year "the Switch Hitting Jesus" becomes the force we all dreamed of?

It took Yadier Molina 7 seasons to start OPSing in the .800's, and with this being Matt's 6th season can he make a similar leap? He was much more highly regarded as a hitting prospect, and has always had more power.

Similarly, lets say Matt OPS's .850 this year while providing stellar defense, do you go all out to keep him or Davis after their arbitration years? I think I'd lean towards Wieters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just for reference. Here are hist stats (per baseball-reference).

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://widgets.sports-reference.com/wg.fcgi?css=1&site=br&url=%2Fplayers%2Fw%2Fwietema01.shtml&div=div_batting_standard"></script>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the one hand, Wieters had an .826 OPS in March/April 2011, and .937 in March/April 2012, so it is too early to get excited that he is headed for some big break-out. On the other hand, those two seasons arguably were his best two, so hopefully his hot start means we won't see a repeat of his disappointing 2013. He certainly does look real good right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 games seems about right to me to start to think that we might be seeing something different. Let's investigate the first few years of Matt's career, how he's looked after 30 games played.

2009 - rookie year, .722

2010 - .752

2011 - .725

2012 - .890 (finished .764), started to return to earth at around 40 games

2013 - .672

2014 - 1.034 so far through 11 G

So yea, i'd say be excited if he's still doing this kinda thing in mid-May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like his new batting stance. He's too tall not to crouch down some in his stance. When he stood straight up, he seemed to not be able to get down to the pitches lower in the zone and would roll over them and ground out to 2B a lot.

This 100 times over. He's putting the barrel onto balls that he rolled over on in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is' date=' it seems we have some good catching prospects in the minors while not much in the line of 1B with power. I think we can probably replace Matt easier than Davis (Clevanger, Joseph, Ohlman). Maybe I'm wrong and someone can correct me.[/quote']

I think we'll know more after the 2014 season is over. However, I doubt that any of the three players you mention will be nearly as good an offensive/defensive combination as Wieters. Davis isn't easy to replace, either, so picking between them is not easy if it comes to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to say it--and I think it's way too early to think this reasonably possible or likely, I was fooled already for a bit in 2012, not this time--but we would seriously regret that Jimenez contract of Matt turns into a .825-.850 OPS type player...

My main hope on Jimenez is that he can rebound, put up some decent numbers, and become a tradeable commodity...the many people that know more than me about the way the market works: is this at all a realistic possibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...