Jump to content

Texas back in on vlad ...not happy with os offer


Guest Hayden2004

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Is anyone else tired of hearing Atkins constantly being brought up as a comparison to every free agent negotiation?

Was it a mistake? Absolutely. Teams and GM's make mistakes all the time. Some more than others, but that is another discussion for another time.

Was that situation similar to this one? No, not at all IMO. At least Atkins played a position of need...or a position at all.

Maybe we had money in the budget to throw $4.5 in a hole last year, because that is essentially what we did. Who knows? We did not need Atkins, but we needed someone that played that position. We don't need Vlad and we don't need a DH. Would we be better with him? That is certainly debatable. But we can field a team without someone with his skillset.

Just because we vastly overpaid for a free agent last year does not mean that we can commit that same amount of money to someone this year or make another mistake by overpaying someone else or bidding against ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is anyone else tired of hearing Atkins constantly being brought up as a comparison to every free agent negotiation?

Was it a mistake? Absolutely. Teams and GM's make mistakes all the time. Some more than others, but that is another discussion for another time.

Was that situation similar to this one? No, not at all IMO. At least Atkins played a position of need...or a position at all.

Maybe we had money in the budget to throw $4.5 in a hole last year, because that is essentially what we did. Who knows? We did not need Atkins, but we needed someone that played that position. We don't need Vlad and we don't need a DH. Would we be better with him? That is certainly debatable. But we can field a team without someone with his skillset.

Just because we vastly overpaid for a free agent last year does not mean that we can commit that same amount of money to someone this year or make another mistake by overpaying someone else or bidding against ourselves.

The issue with Atkins was not the money, it was the evaluation of him. There were a number of teams interested in him, and he probabaly would have gotten something close to the 4.5 MM we game him from someone else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue with Atkins was not the money, it was the evaluation of him. There were a number of teams interested in him, and he probabaly would have gotten something close to the 4.5 MM we game him from someone else.

I am just saying that it was a mistake, and we certainly know that now. But we cannot compare that situation to everyone else. That logic does not usually work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just saying that it was a mistake, and we certainly know that now. But we cannot compare that situation to everyone else. That logic does not usually work.
I'm not arguing with you. People seem to not be able to understand that a player's value is determined by the market for him, independent of his potential productivety. There was a market for Atkins that made him worth about 4.5 MM. The market for Vlad makes him worth around 4MM, even though he is obviously the better investment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not arguing with you. People seem to not be able to understand that a player's value is determined by the market for him, independent of his potential productivety. There was a market for Atkins that made him worth about 4.5 MM. The market for Vlad makes him worth around 4MM, even though he is obviously the better investment.

Oh I know you are not arguing with me. Sorry, that last post was not really in response to anything you said. And I agree with what you are saying here.

I can imagine if we do not sign Evan Longoria when he becomes a free agent in 2017, people on here saying "well, we did give Atkins $4.5M in 2010."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Blue Jays are out on Vlad. From MLBTraderumors...

The Blue Jays have money to spend now that they've unloaded most or all of Wells' deal and they remain open to making acquisitions. Anthopoulos, a Montreal native and former Expos employee, says he can relate to fans who want a bona fide slugger like Vladimir Guerrero.

"I understand," Anthopoulos said. "He was one of my favorite players growing up and he's someone that I admire."

However, Anthopoulos exaplined that he doesn't want to acquire players who get playing time in place of developing players. For example, the Blue Jays intend to provide their top catching prospect with the chance to show major league pitchers why he won the Pacific Coast League MVP last year.

“We really don’t want to get in the way of J.P. Arencibia because we do believe that he’s an important component of this team” Anthopoulos said. “He has nothing more to prove down [in the minors]. He needs to get an opportunity to play up here and we might have to let him live through some struggles early on.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sports Guy: Rumor..only thing holding #WNST back from being a good station are listeners and hosts with knowledge and intelligence.

about 1 min ago via web

Dipper: Fact: Orioles among 30 teams vying for Vlad's services.

That's about as much good as many of these legit "reporters" give us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Vlad's so insulted by $3 million from the O's, I don't understand why he hasn't just accepted one of his other offers. Oh, wait - he has no other offers.

This is not the first time that Vlad had an offer from the Orioles that he sat on, just patiently waiting for something he liked better to come along. Back in 2003, it must have been about a month between when we made our initial offer and when another team put something on the table. And then -- poof! -- he was gone. There's a pretty decent chance that history is going to repeat itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not the first time that Vlad had an offer from the Orioles that he sat on, just patiently waiting for something he liked better to come along. Back in 2003, it must have been about a month between when we made our initial offer and when another team put something on the table. And then -- poof! -- he was gone. There's a pretty decent chance that history is going to repeat itself.

Yeah, that probably is what Vlad's thinking. And it worked out for him in 2003 - he got the offer he wanted and proceeded to win the 2004 MVP award. Back then, the O's definitely needed him more than he needed the O's.

But it's hard to say what to do if you're in the O's position. You don't want to bid against yourself, and the O's offer in 2003 seemed to be fair. It's hard to know about their current offer without knowing what it is. $2 million seems low, but if it's a $3 million base with incentives that could take it to $5, then it seems like the O's are in the same position as in 2003 - a fair offer on the table to a guy who doesn't really want to come here. The difference, in my opinion, is that Vlad was worth overpaying in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Making some changes on the biz end of things.  Sounds like Bader is gone from his role too..which is great because he’s awful.
    • I love the wall. Love it. I think every Major League ballpark should have dimensions like that. By and large teams build parks with much smaller dimensions than a century ago, despite the players being dramatically bigger, stronger, faster athletes. It makes no sense. The game would be improved with much larger outfields. It would emphasize speed and athleticism over endless lineups of slow sluggers.
    • Yes, so hes a FA, the Discussion should now turn to what Elias or anybody else might offer next year. and it's tough because at 34 he's almost a one year wonder. But I do know this our season came back from trouble all year and Big Al was there to help many times. 
    • We all know you think you're passionate about your team and your ideas. but the way you continually insult people whose ideas you don't agree with, or who disagree with you, is incredibly childish.   It's a form of cyber-bullying.   I'd like to think you're better than that, and wonder why more people don't call you out on it.  Maybe they know it won't change anything? Is it not possible to disagree without having to insult either the person or their thoughts?  I know it's hard to self-reflect and realize that you constantly do this, and maybe make a change for the better, but I kind of expect some insults are now headed my way for trying to make this place a bit less hostile.  
    • We'll see Rubenstein talks a good game, but actions speak louder than words. Also it's on Elias to be willing to make a splash if the right (but also pricey) player become available and wants to be an Oriole. I was never big on an Adley extension even last year with the way catchers age. Gunnar is a player you absolutely lock up to an early contact extension assuming he is even open to it.
    • I think for almost all owners payroll matters more than winning. Even teams like the Yankees are careful with how they go into penalty.
    • For sure. That's why the Hyde quote implies he is a free agent.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...