Jump to content

Sign Guthrie


JERSEYORIOLE

Recommended Posts

I understand that there is alot of talk about dealing Guts near the deadline because he will have value and can return some pieces. I for one am against it. Guthrie has been thrust into a No 1 role the last couple of years and we all know he is not a number one. However, he is a sold 3 or 4, something that has not been easy to find for the Orioles in the past. I do not think we can return what he gives us, as I think his value to the Orioles is greater then what he can return. He has played on very bad teams. He never complains. He is a great citizen. He wants to be here. He fired Scott Boras. By all accounts he is a good teammate. These are the things I want in an Oriole. He should be rewarded. I would sign him right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I love Guthrie, I really do. But I'd probably test the trade market this July. We might be able to get a lot for him if he continues pitching well. He's a legit 2/3 and those guys don't go cheaply. Just don't trade him to a team in our division, if he's traded.

Now, if the market isn't that strong, I'd hold on to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Guthrie, I really do. But I'd probably test the trade market this July. We might be able to get a lot for him if he continues pitching well. He's a legit 2/3 and those guys don't go cheaply. Just don't trade him to a team in our division, if he's traded.

Now, if the market isn't that strong, I'd hold on to him.

Why not?

If the Yankees offer us the best deal, you trade him for a lesser package?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bedard was a different animal. Not the nicest guy and would have demanded big money, totally different situation.

He was also a better pitcher.

Who cares who is nicer...We are building an organization here, not a boy scout troop.

Guthrie is going to want to get paid too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's like asking how much damage the bullet caused when it was shot into the corpse.

The situations are pretty different, especially if the trade turns out poorly.

No they aren't...We are still miles away from contention and need an infusion of young talent.

If anything, we are in better shape now than before because of the emergence of some of our young pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was also a better pitcher.

Who cares who is nicer...We are building an organization here, not a boy scout troop.

Guthrie is going to want to get paid too.

Really? Thanks for that information, hey Milton Bradley is available.

You miss the point. Guthrie is everything I want in an Oriole. If we get blown away by an offer, then take it. But that goes for almost anyone on this team. In my Opinion we will not get for him what he brings to this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Also, our Bad Manager had Mullins bunt with men on 1st and 2nd and nobody out precisely…two games ago, on Sunday in Detroit. Fouled off the first two, then flied out rather meekly to center field (advancing the runners anyway on nice tag-ups by Soto and Henderson). But then Santander popped up and Kjerstad hit a weak tapper back to the pitcher, so we went empty. Gave up an out with one of our hottest hitters — just to set up two dudes who couldn’t come through. I didn’t see Hyde getting too much praise as a Good Manager for doing that on Sunday. If he’d gone right back to the same strategy that failed a couple days ago in the exact same situation, then we’d be telling him “job well done” this time? Only if it worked, I’d wager…
    • Different era obviously, but Rochester AAA manager Earl Weaver replaced O's skipper Hank Bauer in '68, just a year and a half after Bauer won the World Series. 
    • A good manager would have instructed him to bunt Well not for nothing, but I would like 100 dollars for every time a Good Manager did not bunt with first and second with nobody out. Now if the SF pitcher was LH, I would be onboard. If they were down by 1, maybe. Why would you not let Mullins hit there?
    • Putting aside the issue of “not counting” stats that don’t fit the argument, I’m curious who he would have had hit there. What were the other options? Eloy Jimenez (1 for his last 23) Coby Mayo (3 for 37 with 21 Ks as a pro) Jackson Holliday (0 for last 22 vs LHPs  with 12 Ks) Livan Soto (~.600 career AAA OPS vs LHPs)   Not saying Slater was some slam dunk pick, but I honestly don’t really even understand how folks can criticize Hyde for those types of decisions anymore. Every lever he has available to pull is clearly marked *WRONG* in flashing red lights. 
    • Is it really the injuries?  
    • People born in 1984 are 40 now and have never seen the O’s get past the ALCS
    • Really tired of the losing, but even more tired of the team not playing the game the right way. Giants losing by a run get men on 1st and 2nd no outs, and their next guy lays down a nice bunt. Kremer slips fielding the roller and next thing you know they got bases loaded no outs, and a couple minutes later three runs have crossed the plate. We have the same situation in the 7th inning and our best bunt guy up to bat, and what does Hyde do? He has Mullins (0-3 at that point w/o hitting the ball out of the infield) swing away. WTF. Mullins strikes out, and our runners are eventually stranded.    At the very least Mullins should shown bunt. He didn’t. A good manager would have instructed him to bunt. Hyde didn’t. His team lost the game, and more importantly his team deserved to lose. That’s what really pisses me off. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...